IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v18y2016i2p196-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and examination of the psychometric properties of the Learning Experience Scale in nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Miyuki Takase
  • Takiko Imai
  • Chizuru Uemura

Abstract

This paper examines the psychometric properties of the Learning Experience Scale. A survey method was used to collect data from a total of 502 nurses. Data were analyzed by factor analysis and the known‐groups technique to examine the construct validity of the scale. In addition, internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, and stability was examined by test‐retest correlation. Factor analysis showed that the Learning Experience Scale consisted of five factors: learning from practice, others, training, feedback, and reflection. The scale also had the power to discriminate between nurses with high and low levels of nursing competence. The internal consistency and the stability of the scale were also acceptable. The Learning Experience Scale is a valid and reliable instrument, and helps organizations to effectively design learning interventions for nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Miyuki Takase & Takiko Imai & Chizuru Uemura, 2016. "Development and examination of the psychometric properties of the Learning Experience Scale in nursing," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 196-202, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:2:p:196-202
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12244
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lloria, M. Begoña & Moreno-Luzon, Maria D., 2014. "Organizational learning: Proposal of an integrative scale and research instrument," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 692-697.
    2. Teresa Elizabeth Stone & Rachel Rossiter, 2014. "Making the most of conference attendance," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 275-276, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rong Tan & Kaiyan Luo & Deying Hu & Yue Zhao & Yanhong Han & Ke Xu, 2020. "Inpatient Suicide Second Victim Experience and Support Tool: Psychometric properties of a scale for nurses who experienced inpatient suicide at Chinese general hospitals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1111-1120, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Salvador Roig-Dobón, 2016. "Main drivers of human capital, learning and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 961-978, October.
    2. Yunji Moon & Deborah J. Armstrong, 2020. "Service quality factors affecting customer attitudes in online-to-offline commerce," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne, 2014. "Sustainable water storage by agricultural businesses: Strategic responses to institutional pressures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2590-2602.
    4. Akram Hasan Aljaffan, 2017. "A Review of the Tripartite Model Linking Associations between TQM, Organizational Learning, and Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 11-30, August.
    5. María Isabel Camio & Constanza María Díaz Bilotto & Silvia Irene Izquierdo & María Belén Álvarez, 2020. "Aprendizaje organizacional: una demarcación conceptual para su medición," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 28(2), pages 85-108, December.
    6. Tourky, Marwa & Alwi, Sharifah Faridah Syed & Kitchen, Philip & Melewar, T.C. & Shaalan, Ahmed, 2020. "New conceptualization and measurement of corporate identity: Evidence from UK food and beverage industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 595-606.
    7. Chi-Yo Huang & I-Ling Tung, 2020. "Strategies for Heterogeneous R&D Alliances of In Vitro Diagnostics Firms in Rapidly Catching-Up Economies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-34, May.
    8. Rachel Cathrine Rossiter & Teresa Elizabeth Stone, 2015. "Getting the message across: Delivering a quality conference presentation," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 145-147, June.
    9. Nancy Vargas & M. Begoña Lloria & Addisson Salazar & Luis Vergara, 2018. "Effect of exploitation and exploration on the innovative as outcomes in entrepreneurial firms," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1053-1069, December.
    10. To, Chester K.M. & Chau, K.P. & Kan, Chi Wai, 2020. "The logic of innovative value proposition: A schema for characterizing and predicting business model evolution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 502-520.
    11. Turulja Lejla & Bajgorić Nijaz, 2018. "Knowing Means Existing: Organizational Learning Dimensions and Knowledge Management Capability," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:2:p:196-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.