IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v64y2017i2p85-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocation with demand competition: Uniform, proportional, and lexicographic mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Jianbin Li
  • Niu Yu
  • Zhixin Liu
  • Xueyuan Cai

Abstract

We examine capacity allocation mechanisms in a supply chain comprising a monopolistic supplier and two competing retailers with asymmetric market powers. The supplier allocates limited capacity to retailers according to uniform, proportional, or lexicographic mechanism. We study the impact of these allocation mechanisms on supplier pricing decisions and retailer ordering behavior. With individual order size no greater than supplier capacity, we show that all three mechanisms guarantee equilibrium ordering. We provide precise structures of retailer ordering decisions in Nash and dominant equilibria. Further, we compare the mechanisms from the perspective of the supplier, the retailers, and the supply chain. We show that regardless of whether retailer market powers are symmetric, lexicographic allocation with any priority sequence of retailers is better than the other two mechanisms for the supplier. Further, under lexicographic allocation, the supplier gains more profit by granting higher priority to the retailer with greater market power. We also extend our study to the case with multiple retailers. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 64: 85–107, 2017

Suggested Citation

  • Jianbin Li & Niu Yu & Zhixin Liu & Xueyuan Cai, 2017. "Allocation with demand competition: Uniform, proportional, and lexicographic mechanisms," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 85-107, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:2:p:85-107
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21734
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Allocation Using Past Sales: When to Turn-and-Earn," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 685-703, May.
    2. Sprumont, Yves, 1991. "The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 509-519, March.
    3. Zhixin Liu, 2012. "Equilibrium analysis of capacity allocation with demand competition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3‐4), pages 254-265, April.
    4. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 1999. "Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1091-1108, August.
    5. Soo-Haeng Cho & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Technical Note---Capacity Allocation Under Retail Competition: Uniform and Competitive Allocations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 72-80, February.
    6. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    7. Yefen Chen & Xuanming Su & Xiaobo Zhao, 2012. "Modeling Bounded Rationality in Capacity Allocation Games with the Quantal Response Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1952-1962, October.
    8. Ananth V. Iyer & Vinayak Deshpande & Zhengping Wu, 2003. "A Postponement Model for Demand Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 983-1002, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. LIN, Feng & QIN, Xibei & PU, Xujin & ZHU, Weiwei & ZHUO, Xingxuan, 2021. "Effects of in-house production on channel structures in a co-opetitive supply chain under supply uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Cai, Xueyuan & Li, Jianbin & Lian, Zhaotong & Liu, Zhixin, 2022. "Fixed allocation of capacity for multiple retailers under demand competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Xueyuan & Li, Jianbin & Lian, Zhaotong & Liu, Zhixin, 2022. "Fixed allocation of capacity for multiple retailers under demand competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Eirini Spiliotopoulou & Karen Donohue & Mustafa Çagri Gürbüz, 2022. "Ordering Behavior and the Impact of Allocation Mechanisms in an Integrated Distribution System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 422-441, February.
    3. Soo-Haeng Cho & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Technical Note---Capacity Allocation Under Retail Competition: Uniform and Competitive Allocations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(1), pages 72-80, February.
    4. Zhibin (Ben) Yang & Xinxin Hu & Haresh Gurnani & Huiqi Guan, 2018. "Multichannel Distribution Strategy: Selling to a Competing Buyer with Limited Supplier Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2199-2218, May.
    5. Tony Haitao Cui & Yinghao Zhang, 2018. "Cognitive Hierarchy in Capacity Allocation Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1250-1270, March.
    6. Nicholas G. Hall & Zhixin Liu, 2010. "Capacity Allocation and Scheduling in Supply Chains," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1711-1725, December.
    7. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    8. Ziteng Wang & Yue Dai & Shu‐Cherng Fang & Zhong‐Zhong Jiang & Yifan Xu, 2020. "Inventory transshipment game with limited supply: Trap or treat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(6), pages 383-403, September.
    9. İsmail Bakal & Nesim Erkip & Refik Güllü, 2011. "Value of supplier’s capacity information in a two-echelon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 115-135, November.
    10. Qiang Gong, 2008. "Optimal Buy-Back Contracts with Asymmetric Information," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 23-47.
    11. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 2004. "Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1887-1893, December.
    12. Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu & Martin A. Lariviere, 2012. "Capacity Allocation over a Long Horizon: The Return on Turn-and-Earn," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 24-41, January.
    13. Zhu, Mengping & Liu, Zhixue & Li, Jianbin & Zhu, Stuart X., 2020. "Electric vehicle battery capacity allocation and recycling with downstream competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 365-379.
    14. Yefen Chen & Xuanming Su & Xiaobo Zhao, 2012. "Modeling Bounded Rationality in Capacity Allocation Games with the Quantal Response Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1952-1962, October.
    15. Dinah A. Cohen-Vernik & Devavrat Purohit, 2014. "Turn-and-Earn Incentives with a Product Line," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 400-414, February.
    16. Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2009. "Inventory rationing and sharing in pre-sell distribution with mobile communication technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 584-600, October.
    17. Hofstra, Nienke & Spiliotopoulou, Eirini, 2022. "Behavior in rationing inventory across retail channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 208-222.
    18. Zhixin Liu, 2012. "Equilibrium analysis of capacity allocation with demand competition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(3‐4), pages 254-265, April.
    19. Qing, Qiankai & Deng, Tianhu & Wang, Hongwei, 2017. "Capacity allocation under downstream competition and bargaining," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 97-107.
    20. Xiaoshuai Fan & Ying‐Ju Chen & Christopher S. Tang, 2023. "Allocating scarce resources in the presence of private information and heterogeneous favoritism," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(7), pages 2068-2086, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:64:y:2017:i:2:p:85-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.