Capacity Allocation Using Past Sales: When to Turn-and-Earn
AbstractConsider a supplier selling to multiple retailers. Demand varies across periods, but the supplier's capacity and wholesale price are fixed. If demand is high, the retailers' needs exceed capacity, and the supplier must implement an allocation mechanism to dole out production. We examine how the choice of mechanism impacts retailer actions and supply chain performance. In particular, we analyze turn-and-earn allocation, a method commonly used in the automobile industry. This scheme bases current allocations on past sales and thus enables retailers to influence their future allocations; they compete for scarce capacity even if they do not compete for customers. We show that turn-and-earn induces the retailers to increase their sales when demand is low and the supplier's capacity is otherwise underutilized. Supplier profits thus increase. The impact on the supply chain depends on how restrictive capacity is. With mildly tight capacity, the retailers' higher sales rate does not significantly lower their profits but does reduce the cost of idle capacity. Supply chain performance improves. With extremely tight capacity, the retailers' intense competition dissipates more profits than the supplier gains, and supply chain performance suffers. Consequently, turn-and-earn does not generally coordinate the system. It is best characterized as a means for the supplier to increase her profits at the expense of the retailers and potentially even the supply chain. Furthermore, these results hold even if the retailers can hold inventory in anticipation of scarce capacity.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by INFORMS in its journal Management Science.
Volume (Year): 45 (1999)
Issue (Month): 5 (May)
capacity allocation; bullwhip effect; supply chain management; game theory;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
- VANOVERMEIRE, Christine & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth & VAN BREEDAM, Alex & VANNIEUWENHUYSE, Bart & VERSTREPEN, Sven, 2012. "Efficient supply chains through flexible horizontal collaboration," Working Papers 2012007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
- Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2009. "Inventory rationing and sharing in pre-sell distribution with mobile communication technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 584-600, October.
- Schneeweiss, Christoph & Zimmer, Kirstin & Zimmermann, Michael, 2004. "The design of contracts to coordinate operational interdependencies within the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 43-59, November.
- Jang, Wooseung & Kim, Daeki & Park, Kwangtae, 2013. "Inventory allocation and shipping when demand temporarily exceeds production capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 464-470.
- Wu, Cheng-Han, 2012. "Price and service competition between new and remanufactured products in a two-echelon supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 496-507.
- Mallik, Suman & Harker, Patrick T., 2004. "Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 330-347, December.
- Cruijssen, F.C.A.M. & Borm, P.E.M. & Fleuren, H.A. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2005. "Insinking: A Methodology to Exploit Synergy in Transportation," Discussion Paper 2005-121, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Wei, Yihua & Hu, Qiying & Xu, Chen, 2013. "Ordering, pricing and allocation in a service supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 590-598.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mirko Janc).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.