IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v45y1998i2p165-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal lot sizing and inspection policy for an EMQ model with imperfect inspections

Author

Listed:
  • Viliam Makis

Abstract

An EMQ model with a production process subject to random deterioration is considered. The process can be monitored through inspections, and both the lot size and the inspection schedule are subject to control. The “in‐control” periods are assumed to be generally distributed and the inspections are imperfect, i.e., the true state of the process is not necessarily revealed through an inspection. The objective is the joint determination of the lot size and the inspection schedule, minimizing the long‐run expected average cost per unit time. Both discrete and continuous cases are examined. A dynamic programming formulation is considered in the case where the inspections can be performed only at discrete times, which is typical for the parts industry. In the continuous case, an optimum inspection schedule is obtained for a given production time and given number of inspections by solving a nonlinear programming problem. A two‐dimensional search procedure can be used to find the optimal policy. In the exponential case, the structure of the optimal inspection policy is established using Lagrange's method, and it is shown that the optimal inspection times can be found by solving a nonlinear equation. Numerical studies indicate that the optimal policy performs much better than the optimal policy with periodic inspections considered previously in the literature. The case of perfect inspections is discussed, and an extension of the results obtained previously in the literature is presented. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 45: 165–186, 1998

Suggested Citation

  • Viliam Makis, 1998. "Optimal lot sizing and inspection policy for an EMQ model with imperfect inspections," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 165-186, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:2:p:165-186
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199803)45:23.0.CO;2-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199803)45:23.0.CO;2-6
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199803)45:23.0.CO;2-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Groenevelt & Liliane Pintelon & Abraham Seidmann, 1992. "Production Lot Sizing with Machine Breakdowns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 104-123, January.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    3. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    4. M. A. Rahim & P. K. Banerjee, 1993. "A generalized model for the economic design of x̄control charts for production systems with increasing failure rate and early replacement," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 787-809, October.
    5. Harry Groenevelt & Liliane Pintelon & Abraham Seidmann, 1992. "Production Batching with Machine Breakdowns and Safety Stocks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 959-971, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiu, Singa Wang & Liang, Gang-Ming & Chiu, Yuan-Shyi Peter & Chiu, Tiffany, 2019. "Production planning incorporating issues of reliability and backlogging with service level constraint," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    2. Ching-Ter Chang & Huang-Mu Chen & Zheng-Yun Zhuang, 2014. "Integrated multi-choice goal programming and multi-segment goal programming for supplier selection considering imperfect-quality and price-quantity discounts in a multiple sourcing environment," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 1101-1111, May.
    3. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    2. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.
    3. Bouslah, Bassem & Gharbi, Ali & Pellerin, Robert, 2013. "Joint optimal lot sizing and production control policy in an unreliable and imperfect manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 143-156.
    4. Kim, Chang Hyun & Hong, Yushin, 1997. "An extended EMQ model for a failure prone machine with general lifetime distribution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 215-223, May.
    5. Meller, Russell D. & Kim, David S., 1996. "The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 577-591, December.
    6. Ki Ling Cheung & Warren H. Hausman, 1997. "Joint determination of preventive maintenance and safety stocks in an unreliable production environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 257-272, April.
    7. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 606-618, March.
    8. Harun Öztürk, 2019. "Modeling an inventory problem with random supply, inspection and machine breakdown," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 497-527, June.
    9. Chelbi, Anis & Ait-Kadi, Daoud, 2004. "Analysis of a production/inventory system with randomly failing production unit submitted to regular preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 712-718, August.
    10. Harun Öztürk, 2021. "Optimal production run time for an imperfect production inventory system with rework, random breakdowns and inspection costs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 167-204, March.
    11. Hyun Kim, Chang & Hong, Yushin, 1999. "An optimal production run length in deteriorating production processes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 183-189, January.
    12. Dhouib, K. & Gharbi, A. & Ben Aziza, M.N., 2012. "Joint optimal production control/preventive maintenance policy for imperfect process manufacturing cell," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 126-136.
    13. Thomas Sloan, 2008. "Simultaneous determination of production and maintenance schedules using in‐line equipment condition and yield information," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 116-129, March.
    14. El-Ferik, Sami, 2008. "Economic production lot-sizing for an unreliable machine under imperfect age-based maintenance policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 150-163, April.
    15. Jeang, Angus, 2012. "Simultaneous determination of production lot size and process parameters under process deterioration and process breakdown," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 774-781.
    16. Giri, B.C. & Dohi, T., 2007. "Inspection scheduling for imperfect production processes under free repair warranty contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 238-252, November.
    17. Shoshana Anily & Abraham Grosfeld-Nir, 2006. "An Optimal Lot-Sizing and Offline Inspection Policy in the Case of Nonrigid Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 311-323, April.
    18. Wright, CM & Mehrez, A, 1998. "An Overview of Representative Research of the Relationships Between Quality and Inventory," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 29-47, February.
    19. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    20. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:2:p:165-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.