IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4289-4299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust in the nurse: Findings from a survey of hospitalised children

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemarie Sheehan
  • Gerard Fealy

Abstract

Aims and objectives To measure hospitalised children's trust in the nurse. Background Trust is central to the therapeutic relationship between the nurse and the patient. There can be no trusting relationship between the nurse and child if the parents have no trust or block the relationship (Bricher [Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8: 452, 1999]). Design This study was a cross‐sectional, correlational descriptive design using a self‐complete questionnaire to measure children's trust in nurses, to examine the relationship between children's trust and their parents, and the correlations between trust and medication adherence, fear and interactions with the nurse. Methods A modified version of the Children's Trust in General Nurses Scale designed by Rotenberg et al. (Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 20: 298, 2015) was used. This Scale is a short self‐report questionnaire designed to elicit information on children's beliefs in, and attitudes to, trust in nurses. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement for observational studies was applied (von Elm [British Medical Journal, 335: 806, 2007]). Results The results indicated high levels of trust beliefs in the nurse. The children's and parents’ trust beliefs were found to be correlated. Gender did not influence trust beliefs. Younger children had higher levels of trust than older children, particularly in relation to the perceived honesty of the nurse. Trust beliefs in the nurse lessened with previous exposure to the hospital setting. One‐fifth of children reported fear of the nurse. Positive interaction with the nurse was shown to be positively related to adherence to care. Relevance to clinical practice Children's level of trust in the nurse can be measured. A trusting child is likely to be less fearful and experience clinical procedures as less threatening and is more likely to adhere to treatment. Children's nurses should recognise that trust can change with age and with multiple hospital admissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemarie Sheehan & Gerard Fealy, 2020. "Trust in the nurse: Findings from a survey of hospitalised children," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4289-4299, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4289-4299
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15466
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carina Sjöberg & Helene Amhliden & Jens M Nygren & Susann Arvidsson & Petra Svedberg, 2015. "The perspective of children on factors influencing their participation in perioperative care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2945-2953, October.
    2. Gilson, Lucy, 2003. "Trust and the development of health care as a social institution," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 1453-1468, April.
    3. Ozawa, Sachiko & Sripad, Pooja, 2013. "How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 10-14.
    4. Carol Hilliard & Mary O’Neill, 2010. "Nurses’ emotional experience of caring for children with burns," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2907-2915, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smirnova, Michelle & Owens, Jennifer Gatewood, 2017. "Medicalized addiction, self-medication, or nonmedical prescription drug use? How trust figures into incarcerated women's conceptualization of illicit prescription drug use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 106-115.
    2. Stasiulis, Elaine & Gibson, Barbara E. & Webster, Fiona & Boydell, Katherine M., 2020. "Resisting governance and the production of trust in early psychosis intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. Arakelyan, Stella & Jailobaeva, Kanykey & Dakessian, Arek & Diaconu, Karin & Caperon, Lizzie & Strang, Alison & Bou-Orm, Ibrahim R. & Witter, Sophie & Ager, Alastair, 2021. "The role of trust in health-seeking for non-communicable disease services in fragile contexts: A cross-country comparative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    4. Mary B. Adam & Angela Donelson, 2022. "Trust is the engine of change: A conceptual model for trust building in health systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 116-127, January.
    5. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Hansen, Johan & de Jong, Judith D., 2019. "Trust in times of health reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 281-287.
    6. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Trusting the health system and COVID 19 restriction compliance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118267, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Franzén, Cecilia & Nilsson, Eva-Lotta & Norberg, Johan R. & Peterson, Tomas, 2020. "Trust as an analytical concept for the study of welfare programmes to reduce child health disparities: The case of a Swedish postnatal home visiting programme," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Trusting the Health System and COVID 19 Restriction Compliance," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    9. Krunoslav Nikodem & Marko Ćurković & Ana Borovečki, 2022. "Trust in the Healthcare System and Physicians in Croatia: A Survey of the General Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Hamill, Heather & Hampshire, Kate & Mariwah, Simon & Amoako-Sakyi, Daniel & Kyei, Abigail & Castelli, Michele, 2019. "Managing uncertainty in medicine quality in Ghana: The cognitive and affective basis of trust in a high-risk, low-regulation context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Schneider, Pia, 2005. "Trust in micro-health insurance: an exploratory study in Rwanda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1430-1438, October.
    12. Brownlie, Julie & Howson, Alexandra, 2006. "'Between the demands of truth and government': Health practitioners, trust and immunisation work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 433-443, January.
    13. Coast, Joanna, 2018. "A history that goes hand in hand: Reflections on the development of health economics and the role played by Social Science & Medicine, 1967–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 227-232.
    14. Nong, Paige & Raj, Minakshi & Trinidad, Marie Grace & Rowe, Zachary & Platt, Jodyn, 2021. "Understanding racial differences in attitudes about public health efforts during COVID-19 using an explanatory mixed methods design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    15. Costa-Font, Joan & Vilaplana-Prieto, Cristina, 2023. "Health System Trust and Compliance with COVID-19 Restrictions," IZA Discussion Papers 15961, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Topp, Stephanie M. & Tully, Josslyn & Cummins, Rachel & Graham, Veronica & Yashadhana, Aryati & Elliott, Lana & Taylor, Sean, 2022. "Building patient trust in health systems: A qualitative study of facework in the context of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Worker role in Queensland, Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    17. Alam, Mohammad Zahedul & Hu, Wang & Kaium, Md Abdul & Hoque, Md Rakibul & Alam, Mirza Mohammad Didarul, 2020. "Understanding the determinants of mHealth apps adoption in Bangladesh: A SEM-Neural network approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal & McCallum, Alison, 2006. "The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 156-168, April.
    19. Jae-Young Lim & Hyun-Hoon Lee & Yeon-Hee Hwang, 2011. "Trust on doctor, social capital and medical care use of the elderly," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(2), pages 175-188, April.
    20. Dyer, Thomas Anthony & Owens, Janine & Robinson, Peter Glenn, 2014. "The acceptability of care delegation in skill-mix: The salience of trust," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 170-178.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4289-4299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.