IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i23-24p4342-4356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survey of nurse practitioner controlled drugs and substances prescribing in three Canadian provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Tammy O’Rourke
  • Joseph Kirk
  • Elsie Duff
  • Richard Golonka

Abstract

Aims and objectives In Canada, nurse practitioners (NP) were legally authorised to prescribe controlled drugs and substances (CDS) in 2012. The objective of this study was to understand current NP‐CDS prescribing in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan, Canada. This study is a component of a larger three‐phase survey of NP practice patterns in these same provinces. Background Nurse practitioners are nurses with a graduate degree who have the legal authority to perform expanded functions in health systems, including prescribing CDS. Given the novelty of CDS prescribing for NPs in Canada, little is known about this component of their role. Design A secondary analysis of survey data collected between March 2016 and May 2017 was used to examine NP‐CDS‐prescribing patterns and identify potential associated factors. Methods Nurse practitioners in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan were invited to complete a professional practice pattern survey. The survey was administered through a secure electronic data collection software application (redcap). In the practice pattern survey, 42 variables from 15 distinct conceptual questions were analysed in this study as potential predictors of NP‐CDS prescribing within a purposeful selection ordinal logistic regression model. This scientific submission has been assessed for accuracy and completeness using the Equator STROBE guideline criteria (see Appendix S1). Results/Findings Five variables were found to be associated with an increased odds of more frequent NP‐CDS prescribing in addition to three confounders/clinically relevant variables. Factors commonly associated with an increased frequency of NP‐CDS prescribing relate to location of practice, area of practice, previous nursing experience, team environments and common diagnoses. Conclusion Little is known about NP‐CDS prescribing. Understanding this important component of the NPs emerging legal scope of professional practice can contribute to the continued refinement of this role as well as support ongoing enquiry into the causes of, and potential interventions to prevent, the present opioid overdose deaths occurring while under an active prescription. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding factors that influence NP‐CDS prescribing has relevance to the current drug‐related prescription fatalities crisis in all countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tammy O’Rourke & Joseph Kirk & Elsie Duff & Richard Golonka, 2019. "A survey of nurse practitioner controlled drugs and substances prescribing in three Canadian provinces," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4342-4356, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4342-4356
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timmons, Edward Joseph, 2017. "The effects of expanded nurse practitioner and physician assistant scope of practice on the cost of Medicaid patient care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 189-196.
    2. Stange, Kevin, 2014. "How does provider supply and regulation influence health care markets? Evidence from nurse practitioners and physician assistants," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-27.
    3. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    4. Morris M. Kleiner & Allison Marier & Kyoung Won Park & Coady Wing, 2016. "Relaxing Occupational Licensing Requirements: Analyzing Wages and Prices for a Medical Service," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(2), pages 261-291.
    5. Basak, Ramsankar & Bentley, John P. & McCaffrey, David J. & Bouldin, Alicia S. & Banahan, Benjamin F., 2015. "The role of perceived impact on relationship quality in pharmacists' willingness to influence indication-based off-label prescribing decisions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 181-189.
    6. John J. Perry, 2009. "The Rise And Impact Of Nurse Practitioners And Physician Assistants On Their Own And Cross‐Occupation Incomes," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 27(4), pages 491-511, October.
    7. Valerie Ness & Lesley Price & Kay Currie & Jacqueline Reilly, 2016. "Influences on independent nurse prescribers' antimicrobial prescribing behaviour: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1206-1217, May.
    8. Timmons, Edward, 2016. "Healthcare License Turf Wars: The Effects of Expanded Nurse Practitioner and Physician Assistant Scope of Practice on Medicaid Patient Access," Working Papers 06858, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markowitz, Sara & Adams, E. Kathleen & Lewitt, Mary Jane & Dunlop, Anne L., 2017. "Competitive effects of scope of practice restrictions: Public health or public harm?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 201-218.
    2. McMichael, Benjamin, 2017. "Beyond Physicians: The Effect of Licensing and Liability Laws on the Supply of Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants," Working Papers 07538, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
    3. Sara Markowitz & E. Kathleen Adams, 2022. "The Effects of State Scope of Practice Laws on the Labor Supply of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 65-98.
    4. Benjamin J. McMichael, 2017. "The Demand for Healthcare Regulation: The Effect of Political Spending on Occupational Licensing Laws," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 297-316, July.
    5. Morris M. Kleiner, 2016. "Battling over Jobs: Occupational Licensing in Health Care," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 165-170, May.
    6. Shishir Shakya & Alicia Plemmons, 2020. "Does Scope of Practice Affect Mobility of Nurse Practitioners Serving Medicare Beneficiaries?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 421-434, December.
    7. Laura Barrie Smith, 2022. "The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 21-41, January.
    8. Timmons, Edward Joseph, 2017. "The effects of expanded nurse practitioner and physician assistant scope of practice on the cost of Medicaid patient care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 189-196.
    9. Shishir Shakya & Joshua K. Bedi & Alicia Plemmons, 2024. "Healthcare Workforce Shortages and Job Autonomy: Nurse Practitioners and Entrepreneurship in the United States," Working Papers 24-08, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    10. Xia, Xing, 2021. "Barrier to Entry or Signal of Quality? The Effects of Occupational Licensing on Minority Dental Assistants," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    11. Peter T. Leeson & Henry A. Thompson, 2023. "Public choice and public health," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 5-41, April.
    12. Roman V. Galperin, 2020. "Organizational Powers: Contested Innovation and Loss of Professional Jurisdiction in the Case of Retail Medicine," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 508-534, March.
    13. David Balan & Patrick DeGraba & Francine Lafontaine & Patrick McAlvanah & Devesh Raval & David Schmidt, 2015. "Economics at the FTC: Fraud, Mergers and Exclusion," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(4), pages 371-398, December.
    14. Anca M. Grecu & Lee C. Spector, 2019. "Nurse practitioner's independent prescriptive authority and opioids abuse," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(10), pages 1220-1225, October.
    15. Alexander, Diane & Schnell, Molly, 2019. "Just what the nurse practitioner ordered: Independent prescriptive authority and population mental health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 145-162.
    16. Dick M. Carpenter & Lisa Knepper & Kyle Sweetland & Jennifer McDonald, 2018. "The Continuing Burden of Occupational Licensing in the United States," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 380-405, October.
    17. Jing Cai & Morris M. Kleiner, 2020. "The Labor Market Consequences of Regulating Similar Occupations: the Licensing of Occupational and Physical Therapists," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 352-381, December.
    18. Tianyuan Luo & Cesar L. Escalante & Carmina E. Taylor, 2021. "Labor market outcomes of granting full professional independence to nurse practitioners," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 22-54, August.
    19. Dustin Chambers & Colin O’Reilly, 2022. "The economic theory of regulation and inequality," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 63-78, October.
    20. Timmons, Edward & Hockenberry, Jason & Piette Durrance, Christine, 2016. "More Battles among Licensed Occupations: Estimating the Effects of Scope of Practice and Direct Access on the Chiropractic, Physical Therapist, and Physician Labor Market," Annals of Computational Economics, George Mason University, Mercatus Center, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:23-24:p:4342-4356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.