IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i1-2p227-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants

Author

Listed:
  • Raisa B Gul
  • Parveen A Ali

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This article, based on the available literature, attempts to discuss the importance of recruitment and retention of research participants, the associated barriers and challenges, and various strategies to overcome these barriers. Background. The inability to recruit and retain the required participants in a research project poses serious threats to both the internal and the external validity of a research study. Despite serious implications, the issues of recruitment and retention do not receive due attention in research and publications. Literature suggests a lack of coordinated efforts to collect information on the outcomes of recruitment experiences in clinical trials and population studies. Studies often mention the number of participants who refuse to participate; however, the majority of the studies often fail to mention the specific reasons insufficient recruitment or retention of the participants. Design. A methodological paper. Method. Various participant‐, context‐, environment‐ and research‐related factors are examined that affect the phenomenon of recruitment and retention of the participants in a study. Results. Delayed or inefficient recruitment also has financial and ethical implications. Although there are many pieces of information scattered throughout academic journals on recruitment and retention of participants in research, few authors have dealt with the issue holistically. It is imperative for researchers to understand the importance of recruitment and retention of research participants, the associated barriers and challenges, and various strategies to overcome these barriers. Conclusion. Appropriate recording and reporting of the problems faced while recruiting and retaining the participants in research studies can help not only in understating the challenge, but will also help in devising the strategies to overcome this problem. This article was an attempt to synthesise and review the available literature on recruitment and retention issues, which demand extensive theoretical and conceptual thinking as part of the research design. Relevance to practice. An understanding of the challenges and issues related to recruitment and retention can help researchers to think ahead about the strategies to overcome these issues and consequently save the time and energy of the participants, researchers and funding agencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Raisa B Gul & Parveen A Ali, 2010. "Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 227-233, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:227-233
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03041.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03041.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03041.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corrigan, Patrick W. & Salzer, Mark S., 2003. "The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 109-121, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ragnhild Hedman & Ingrid Hellström & Britt-Marie Ternestedt & Görel Hansebo & Astrid Norberg, 2018. "Sense of Self in Alzheimer’s Research Participants," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(2), pages 191-212, February.
    2. Tracy, Elizabeth M. & Billingsley, Joseph & Pollack, Jeffrey M. & Barber, Dennis & Beorchia, Ace & Carr, Jon C. & Gonzalez, Gabe & Harris, Michael L. & Michaelis, Timothy L. & Morrow, Grayson & Philli, 2021. "A behavioral insights approach to recruiting entrepreneurs for an academic study during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    3. Manuela Peters & Tiara Ratz & Frauke Wichmann & Sonia Lippke & Claudia Voelcker-Rehage & Claudia R. Pischke, 2022. "Ecological Predictors of Older Adults’ Participation and Retention in a Physical Activity Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Strömmer, Sofia & Lawrence, Wendy & Rose, Taylor & Vogel, Christina & Watson, Daniella & Bottell, Joanne N. & Parmenter, Janice & Harvey, Nicholas C. & Cooper, Cyrus & Inskip, Hazel & Baird, Janis & B, 2018. "Improving recruitment to clinical trials during pregnancy: A mixed methods investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 73-82.
    5. Tucker, Tara & Bouvette, Maryse & Daly, Shauna & Grassau, Pamela, 2017. "Finding the sweet spot: Developing, implementing and evaluating a burn out and compassion fatigue intervention for third year medical trainees," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 106-112.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Falconer, Mary Kay & Clark, M.H. & Parris, Don, 2011. "Validity in an evaluation of Healthy Families Florida--A program to prevent child abuse and neglect," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 66-77, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:227-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.