IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v30y2023i4p208-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cryptoassets: Definitions and accounting treatment under the current International Financial Reporting Standards framework

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Parrondo

Abstract

This paper provides a first comprehensive definition of cryptoassets for accounting purposes in the types of payment tokens, electronic money (e‐money) tokens, utility tokens and security tokens. The delivery of definitions for accounting purposes addresses some of the concerns raised by the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) discussion paper and helps accounting regulators adapt current International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) standards to blockchain‐based tokens' taxonomy and nature. The paper helps policymakers reconcile Markets in Cryptoassets Regulation Proposal's (MiCA) definitions and classification of cryptoassets with the EFRAG's specific needs for clarification and/or amendment in the IFRS standards and contributes to providing an accounting guide for practitioners in their financial disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Parrondo, 2023. "Cryptoassets: Definitions and accounting treatment under the current International Financial Reporting Standards framework," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 208-227, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:208-227
    DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1543
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/isaf.1543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boon Seng Tan & Kin Yew Low, 2019. "Blockchain as the Database Engine in the Accounting System," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 312-318, June.
    2. Auer, Raphael, 2019. "Embedded supervision: how to build regulation into blockchain finance," CEPR Discussion Papers 14095, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Andrew B. Jackson & Steven Luu, 2023. "Accounting For Digital Assets," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 302-312, September.
    4. Shuyu Zhang & Dunli Zhang & Jianming Zheng & Walter Aerts, 2021. "Does policy uncertainty of the blockchain dampen ICO markets?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1625-1637, April.
    5. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    6. Benedetti, Hugo & Kostovetsky, Leonard, 2021. "Digital Tulips? Returns to investors in initial coin offerings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muneer M. Alshater & Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Nohade Nasrallah, 2023. "Initial Coin Offerings: a Hybrid Empirical Review," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 891-908, October.
    2. Shih‐Chu Chou & Zhe‐An Li & Tawei Wang & Ju‐Chun Yen, 2023. "How the quality of initial coin offering white papers influences fundraising: Using security token offerings white papers as a benchmark," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-18, January.
    3. Thorsten Schoormann & Julia Schweihoff & Ilka Jussen & Frederik Möller, 2023. "Classification tools for business models: Status quo, comparison, and agenda," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36, December.
    4. Pastwa, Anna M. & Shrestha, Prabal & Thewissen, James & Torsin, Wouter, 2021. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: a topic modeling approach," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2021018, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    5. Stefan Vachkov & Nedyalko Valkanov, 2021. "Regulation, Competition and Partnership in the Financial Sector," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 3, pages 259-276.
    6. Jongsub Lee & Tao Li & Donghwa Shin, 2022. "The Wisdom of Crowds in FinTech: Evidence from Initial Coin Offerings," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 11(1), pages 1-46.
    7. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Choice between IEO and ICO: Speed vs. Liquidity vs. Risk," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Jochen Wulf & Juerg Meierhofer, 2023. "Towards a Taxonomy of Large Language Model based Business Model Transformations," Papers 2311.05288, arXiv.org.
    9. Yaowen Shan & Sue Wright, 2023. "Contemporary Challenges: Spotlight on Climate, Cryptocurrencies and SME Practices," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(3), pages 229-229, September.
    10. Auer, Raphael & Claessens, Stijn, 2020. "Cryptocurrency market reactions to regulatory news," CEPR Discussion Papers 14602, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Simon Scheider & Florian Lauf & Simon Geller & Frederik Möller & Boris Otto, 2023. "Exploring design elements of personal data markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Tao, Zhijie & Peng, Bo & Ma, Lina, 2023. "Optimal initial coin offering under speculative token trading," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 632-644.
    13. Auer, Raphael & Tercero-Lucas, David, 2022. "Distrust or speculation? The socioeconomic drivers of U.S. cryptocurrency investments," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Garratt, Rodney J. & van Oordt, Maarten R.C., 2022. "Entrepreneurial incentives and the role of initial coin offerings," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    15. Nina Thornton & Martin Engert & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Finding new purpose for vacancies in rural areas: a taxonomy of coworking space business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1395-1423, September.
    16. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Sevic, Aleksandar & González-López, Isaac, 2022. "A preliminary assessment of the performance of DeFi cryptocurrencies in relation to other financial assets, volatility, and user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    17. Lennart Ante, 2020. "A place next to Satoshi: foundations of blockchain and cryptocurrency research in business and economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1305-1333, August.
    18. de Andrés, Pablo & Arroyo, David & Correia, Ricardo & Rezola, Alvaro, 2022. "Challenges of the market for initial coin offerings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Kreppmeier, Julia & Laschinger, Ralf & Steininger, Bertram & Dorfleitner, Gregor, 2023. "Real Estate Security Token Offerings and the Secondary Market: Driven by Crypto Hype or Fundamentals?," Working Paper Series 23/6, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    20. Patrick Zschech, 2023. "Beyond descriptive taxonomies in data analytics: a systematic evaluation approach for data-driven method pipelines," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 193-227, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:30:y:2023:i:4:p:208-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.