IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/intemj/v19y2023i3d10.1007_s11365-023-00867-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding new purpose for vacancies in rural areas: a taxonomy of coworking space business models

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Thornton

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Martin Engert

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Andreas Hein

    (Technical University of Munich)

  • Helmut Krcmar

    (Technical University of Munich)

Abstract

As a result of the rural exodus over the last decades, unused vacancies in rural areas are at risk of falling into disrepair. Given the current trends of flexible workplaces and people returning to rural areas, their repurposing as coworking spaces (CWSs) by entrepreneurs poses a potential for sustainable future-oriented workplace solutions. However, there is little to no guidance on the structural configuration and business models of CWSs in rural areas available for these entrepreneurs. We apply a structured empirical research approach to create a comprehensive and specialized taxonomy, including a literature review and eleven interviews with operators of rural CWSs in Germany. The resulting taxonomy of business models of CWSs in rural areas based on an extension of the business model canvas contributes to the knowledge base on rural CWSs. We evaluate its usability through a case study and an entrepreneurial operator of a rural CWS, underlining its entrepreneurial and practice-oriented purpose. The study addresses several urgent topics, such as the future of work and new work (places), which enable and accelerate the development of CWSs outside agglomerations consequential to the COVID-19 pandemic. It also promotes social and sustainable entrepreneurship and the revitalizing, enhancing, and increasing of digital accessibility of rural regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Thornton & Martin Engert & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Finding new purpose for vacancies in rural areas: a taxonomy of coworking space business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1395-1423, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00867-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-023-00867-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11365-023-00867-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11365-023-00867-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor Cabral & Willem Van Winden, 2020. "The promise of coworking environments: a content analysis of the positioning of collaborative workspaces in Amsterdam," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(3), pages 399-423.
    2. Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte & Henri Isaac, 2016. "The new office: how coworking changes the work concept," Post-Print hal-01603367, HAL.
    3. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sven M. Laudien & Viktor Fredrich & Lars Görmar, 2018. "Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 385-410, March.
    4. Manuel Mayerhoffer, 2020. "Growth factors of the coworking industry: the case of Prague," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 203-212, March.
    5. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Juan F. Martínez-Pérez, 2020. "Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1465-1481, December.
    6. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Andreas J. Reuschl, 2018. "Coworking-spaces: how a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 317-334, January.
    7. Victor Cabral & Willem Van Winden, 2016. "Coworking: an analysis of coworking strategies for interaction and innovation," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 357-377.
    8. Bouncken, Ricarda & Ratzmann, Martin & Barwinski, Roman & Kraus, Sascha, 2020. "Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 102-110.
    9. Jongseok Seo & Lidziya Lysiankova & Young-Seok Ock & Dongphil Chun, 2017. "Priorities of Coworking Space Operation Based on Comparison of the Hosts and Users’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    10. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Yixin Qiu & Thomas Clauss, 2020. "Coworking-Space Business Models: Micro-Ecosystems and Platforms — Insights from China," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Vasilis Avdikos & Janet Merkel, 2020. "Supporting open, shared and collaborative workspaces and hubs: recent transformations and policy implications," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 348-357, July.
    12. Julian Waters-Lynch & Jason Potts, 2017. "The social economy of coworking spaces: a focal point model of coordination," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 417-433, October.
    13. Ina Krause, 2019. "Coworking Spaces: Windows to the Future of Work? Changes in the Organizational Model of Work and the Attitudes of the Younger Generation," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 52-60.
    14. Robert C Nickerson & Upkar Varshney & Jan Muntermann, 2013. "A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 336-359, May.
    15. Philip T. Roundy, 2019. "“It takes a village” to support entrepreneurship: intersecting economic and community dynamics in small town entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1443-1475, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Marko Orel & Manuel Mayerhoffer & Jana Fratricova & Anna Pilkova & Marzena Starnawska & Dora Horvath, 2022. "Coworking spaces as talent hubs: The imperative for community building in the changing context of new work," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1503-1531, July.
    3. Gantert, Till M. & Fredrich, Viktor & Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2022. "The moral foundations of makerspaces as unconventional sources of innovation: A study of narratives and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1564-1574.
    4. Domenico Berdicchia & Fulvio Fortezza & Giovanni Masino, 2023. "The key to happiness in collaborative workplaces. Evidence from coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1213-1242, May.
    5. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin & Till Marius Gantert & Julia Verena Maier, 2022. "Acceptance of matchmaking tools in coworking spaces: an extended perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1911-1943, August.
    6. Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek & Minou Weijs-Perrée & Marko Orel & Felix Gauger & Andreas Pfnür, 2021. "User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between the Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2025-2048, October.
    7. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    8. Kameliya Deyanova & Nataliia Brehmer & Artur Lapidus & Victor Tiberius & Steve Walsh, 2022. "Hatching start-ups for sustainable growth: a bibliometric review on business incubators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2083-2109, October.
    9. Erik Rådman & Erik Johansson & Petra Bosch-Sijtsema & Hendry Raharjo, 2023. "In search of member needs in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 881-907, April.
    10. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Juan F. Martínez-Pérez, 0. "Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    11. Alexandra Rese & Lars Görmar & Alena Herbig, 2022. "Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 391-428, February.
    12. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    13. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus & Juan F. Martínez-Pérez, 2020. "Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: the emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1465-1481, December.
    14. Mittal Ella & Rani Tamanna, 2022. "Do Social Interactions Really Moderate Job Productivity in Coworking Spaces?," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 145-160, September.
    15. Ruud Gerards & Sanne Wetten & Cecile Sambeek, 2021. "New ways of working and intrapreneurial behaviour: the mediating role of transformational leadership and social interaction," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2075-2110, October.
    16. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    17. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Ratzmann, Martin & Kraus, Sascha, 2021. "Anti-aging: How innovation is shaped by firm age and mutual knowledge creation in an alliance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 422-429.
    18. Hera Antoniades & Dulani Halvitigala & Chris Eves, 2018. "CoWorking Space v. The Traditional Office Space: Challenges and Opportunities in Sydney," ERES eres2018_294, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    19. Swantje Robelski & Helena Keller & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2019. "Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sven M. Laudien & Viktor Fredrich & Lars Görmar, 2018. "Coopetition in coworking-spaces: value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 385-410, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:intemj:v:19:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11365-023-00867-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.