IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v19y2014i3p225-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Liquidity Risk Using The Exposure‐Based Cash‐Flow‐At‐Risk Approach: An Application To The Uk Banking Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Meilan Yan
  • Maximilian J. B. Hall
  • Paul Turner

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper uses a relatively new quantitative model for estimating UK banks' liquidity risk. The model is called the exposure‐based cash‐flow‐at‐risk (CFaR) model, which not only measures a bank's liquidity risk tolerance but also helps to improve liquidity risk management through the provision of additional risk exposure information. Using data for the period 1997–2010, we provide evidence that there is variable funding pressure across the UK banking industry, which is forecasted to be slightly illiquid with a small amount of expected cash outflow (i.e. £0.06 billion) in 2011. In our sample of the six biggest UK banks, only the HSBC maintains positive CFaR with 95% confidence, which means that there is only a 5% chance that HSBC's cash flow will drop below £0.67 billion by the end of 2011. RBS is expected to face the largest liquidity risk with a 5% chance that the bank will face a cash outflow that year in excess of £40.29 billion. Our estimates also suggest Lloyds TSB's cash flow is the most volatile of the six biggest UK banks, because it has the biggest deviation between its downside cash flow (i.e. CFaR) and expected cash flow. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Meilan Yan & Maximilian J. B. Hall & Paul Turner, 2014. "Estimating Liquidity Risk Using The Exposure‐Based Cash‐Flow‐At‐Risk Approach: An Application To The Uk Banking Sector," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 225-238, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:225-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evert Wipplinger, 2007. "Philippe Jorion: Value at Risk – The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 21(3), pages 397-398, September.
    2. Niclas Andrén & Håkan Jankensgård & Lars Oxelheim, 2005. "Exposure‐Based Cash‐Flow‐at‐Risk: An Alternative to VaR for Industrial Companies," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 17(3), pages 76-86, June.
    3. Glyn A. Holton, 2002. "History of Value-at-Risk: 1922-1998," Method and Hist of Econ Thought 0207001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Gupta, Anurag & Liang, Bing, 2005. "Do hedge funds have enough capital? A value-at-risk approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 219-253, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Salvatore Mare & Dieter Gramlich, 2021. "Risk exposures of European cooperative banks: a comparative analysis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Matthias Nnadi & Vachiraporn Surichamorn & Ranadeva Jayasekera & Yacine Belghitar, 2022. "Empirical analysis of debt maturity, cash holdings and firm investment in developing economies," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3345-3372, July.
    3. Voloshyn, Ihor & Voloshyn, Mykyta, 2013. "Integrated risk management in a commercial market-maker bank using the 'cash flow at risk' approach," MPRA Paper 61562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Voloshyn, Ihor & Voloshyn, Mykyta, 2013. "Risk-adjusted pricing of bank’s assets based on cash flow matching matrix," MPRA Paper 61611, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agarwal, Vikas & Fung, William H. & Loon, Yee Cheng & Naik, Narayan Y., 2004. "Risk and return in convertible arbitrage: Evidence from the convertible bond market," CFR Working Papers 04-03, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    2. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    3. John Kambhu & Til Schuermann & Kevin J. Stiroh, 2007. "Hedge funds, financial intermediation, and systemic risk," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 13(Dec), pages 1-18.
    4. Khraisha, Tamer, 2020. "Complex economic problems and fitness landscapes: Assessment and methodological perspectives," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 390-407.
    5. Mustafa Onur Caglayan & Sevan Ulutas, 2014. "Emerging Market Exposures and the Predictability of Hedge Fund Returns," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(1), pages 149-180, March.
    6. Mei-Ling Tang & Trung K. Do, 2019. "In search of robust methods for multi-currency portfolio construction by value at risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 26(1), pages 107-126, March.
    7. Bakshi, Gurdip & Panayotov, George, 2010. "First-passage probability, jump models, and intra-horizon risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 20-40, January.
    8. Friberg, Richard, 2019. "All the bottles in one basket? Diversification and product portfolio composition," CEPR Discussion Papers 14119, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Ying Li & Hossein Kazemi, 2007. "Conditional Properties of Hedge Funds: Evidence from Daily Returns," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(2), pages 211-238, March.
    10. Monica Billio & Mila Getmansky & Loriana Pelizzon, 2008. "Crises and Hedge Fund Risk," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2561, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Oct 2009.
    11. Kim, Young Shin & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Bianchi, Michele Leonardo & Mitov, Ivan & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2011. "Time series analysis for financial market meltdowns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1879-1891, August.
    12. Judy Qiu & Leilei Tang & Ingo Walter, 2018. "Hedge fund incentives, management commitment and survivorship," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 32(2), pages 115-142, May.
    13. Andrew J. Patton, 2009. "Are "Market Neutral" Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(7), pages 2295-2330, July.
    14. Ozun, Alper & Cifter, Atilla & Yilmazer, Sait, 2007. "Filtered Extreme Value Theory for Value-At-Risk Estimation," MPRA Paper 3302, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Petrella, Lea & Raponi, Valentina, 2019. "Joint estimation of conditional quantiles in multivariate linear regression models with an application to financial distress," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 70-84.
    16. Dora Balog, 2011. "Capital allocation in financial institutions: the Euler method," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1126, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    17. Kouwenberg, Roy & Ziemba, William T., 2007. "Incentives and risk taking in hedge funds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 3291-3310, November.
    18. Berthine Nyunga Mpinda & Jules Sadefo-Kamdem & Salomey Osei & Jeremiah Fadugba, 2021. "Accuracies of Model Risks in Finance using Machine Learning," Working Papers hal-03191437, HAL.
    19. Zeno Adams & Roland Füss & Volker Wohlschieß, 2012. "Investment choice and performance potential in the mutual fund industry," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(2), pages 84-101, April.
    20. Stefan Kassberger & Rüdiger Kiesel, 2006. "A fully parametric approach to return modelling and risk management of hedge funds," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 20(4), pages 472-491, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C87 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Econometric Software
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:19:y:2014:i:3:p:225-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.