IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i3p432-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Oghare Victor Ogidiama
  • Tariq Shamim

Abstract

CO2 capture is considered to be a viable means of reducing the harmful environmental impacts of the fossil fuel usage. The net cost of CO2 capture can be reduced and, consequently, the adoption of CO2 capture methods can be enhanced by developing revenue streams for the captured CO2. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR), which is the process of withdrawing crude from oil reservoirs after primary and secondary withdrawal, is viewed as an attractive means of CO2 utilization. The EOR process has the capacity to take large volumes of CO2 captured from power plants and use them for the production of incremental oil. The process which is known as CO2‐EOR has synergistic benefits for the oil and gas and power generation industries. Different CO2 capture technologies are currently being used and their suitability of supplying captured CO2 for utilization in EOR may not be similar. This study analyzes the ease of utilization of CO2 captured from power plants in EOR applications. The analysis is done by comparing different capture technologies in terms of cost and purity of CO2 captured and their suitability of integration with the EOR. The results determine that the post‐combustion CO2 capture is the most EOR friendly technique in terms of CO2 stream purity, while the chemical looping combustion (CLC) is the most EOR amenable in terms of the capture cost. The results show that the CO2 capture efforts from power plants using CLC can be fully covered by additional oil revenue at oil prices above $27.9 per barrel ($175.5/m3). © 2021 The Authors. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology published by Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Oghare Victor Ogidiama & Tariq Shamim, 2021. "Assessment of CO2 capture technologies for CO2 utilization in enhanced oil recovery," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 432-444, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:432-444
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2057
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cameron Hepburn & Ella Adlen & John Beddington & Emily A. Carter & Sabine Fuss & Niall Mac Dowell & Jan C. Minx & Pete Smith & Charlotte K. Williams, 2019. "The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 87-97, November.
    2. Ampomah, W. & Balch, R.S. & Cather, M. & Will, R. & Gunda, D. & Dai, Z. & Soltanian, M.R., 2017. "Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 80-92.
    3. Mikulčić, Hrvoje & Ridjan Skov, Iva & Dominković, Dominik Franjo & Wan Alwi, Sharifah Rafidah & Manan, Zainuddin Abdul & Tan, Raymond & Duić, Neven & Hidayah Mohamad, Siti Nur & Wang, Xuebin, 2019. "Flexible Carbon Capture and Utilization technologies in future energy systems and the utilization pathways of captured CO2," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Richard Green & Yacob Mulugetta & Zhong Xiang Zhang, 2014. "Sustainable energy policy," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 33, pages 532-550, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jiang, Jieyun & Rui, Zhenhua & Hazlett, Randy & Lu, Jun, 2019. "An integrated technical-economic model for evaluating CO2 enhanced oil recovery development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 190-211.
    6. Vanessa Núñez-López & Ramón Gil-Egui & Seyyed A. Hosseini, 2019. "Environmental and Operational Performance of CO 2 -EOR as a CCUS Technology: A Cranfield Example with Dynamic LCA Considerations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Onyebuchi, V.E. & Kolios, A. & Hanak, D.P. & Biliyok, C. & Manovic, V., 2018. "A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2563-2583.
    8. Zhang, Zhien & Pan, Shu-Yuan & Li, Hao & Cai, Jianchao & Olabi, Abdul Ghani & Anthony, Edward John & Manovic, Vasilije, 2020. "Recent advances in carbon dioxide utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Richard H. Moss & Jae A. Edmonds & Kathy A. Hibbard & Martin R. Manning & Steven K. Rose & Detlef P. van Vuuren & Timothy R. Carter & Seita Emori & Mikiko Kainuma & Tom Kram & Gerald A. Meehl & John F, 2010. "The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7282), pages 747-756, February.
    10. Ogidiama, Oghare Victor & Abu-Zahra, Mohammad R.M. & Shamim, Tariq, 2018. "Techno-economic analysis of a poly-generation solar-assisted chemical looping combustion power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 724-735.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Sijia & Jiang, Lanlan & Cheng, Zucheng & Liu, Yu & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2021. "Experimental study on the CO2-decane displacement front behavior in high permeability sand evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Abdoli, B. & Hooshmand, F. & MirHassani, S.A., 2023. "A novel stochastic programming model under endogenous uncertainty for the CCS-EOR planning problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    3. Liang Xu & Qi Li & Matthew Myers & Yongsheng Tan & Miao He & Happiness Ijeoma Umeobi & Xiaochun Li, 2021. "The effects of porosity and permeability changes on simulated supercritical CO2 migration front in tight glutenite under different effective confining pressures from 1.5 MPa to 21.5 MPa," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 19-36, February.
    4. Galán-Martín, Ángel & Contreras, María del Mar & Romero, Inmaculada & Ruiz, Encarnación & Bueno-Rodríguez, Salvador & Eliche-Quesada, Dolores & Castro-Galiano, Eulogio, 2022. "The potential role of olive groves to deliver carbon dioxide removal in a carbon-neutral Europe: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Hanne Lamberts-Van Assche & Tine Compernolle, 2022. "Using Real Options Thinking to Value Investment Flexibility in Carbon Capture and Utilization Projects: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Natalia Czaplicka & Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa, 2020. "Utilization of Gaseous Carbon Dioxide and Industrial Ca-Rich Waste for Calcium Carbonate Precipitation: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Aysylu Askarova & Aliya Mukhametdinova & Strahinja Markovic & Galiya Khayrullina & Pavel Afanasev & Evgeny Popov & Elena Mukhina, 2023. "An Overview of Geological CO 2 Sequestration in Oil and Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-34, March.
    8. Ryu, Kyung Hwan & Kim, Boeun & Heo, Seongmin, 2022. "Sustainability analysis framework based on global market dynamics: A carbon capture and utilization industry case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Enbin Liu & Xudong Lu & Daocheng Wang, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage: Status, Progress and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-48, March.
    10. Arinelli, Lara de Oliveira & Brigagão, George Victor & Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda & Teixeira, Alexandre Mendonça & de Medeiros, José Luiz & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F., 2022. "Carbon-dioxide-to-methanol intensification with supersonic separators: Extra-carbonated natural gas purification via carbon capture and utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. Xi, Han & Wu, Xiao & Chen, Xianhao & Sha, Peng, 2021. "Artificial intelligent based energy scheduling of steel mill gas utilization system towards carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    12. Christiano B. Peres & Pedro M. R. Resende & Leonel J. R. Nunes & Leandro C. de Morais, 2022. "Advances in Carbon Capture and Use (CCU) Technologies: A Comprehensive Review and CO 2 Mitigation Potential Analysis," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Sara Yasemi & Yasin Khalili & Ali Sanati & Mohammadreza Bagheri, 2023. "Carbon Capture and Storage: Application in the Oil and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-32, October.
    14. Tomasz Czakiert & Jaroslaw Krzywanski & Anna Zylka & Wojciech Nowak, 2022. "Chemical Looping Combustion: A Brief Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Chen, Siyuan & Liu, Jiangfeng & Zhang, Qi & Teng, Fei & McLellan, Benjamin C., 2022. "A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Chai, Rukuan & Liu, Yuetian & Wang, Jingru & Liu, Qianjun & Rui, Zhenhua, 2022. "CO2 utilization and sequestration in Reservoir: Effects and mechanisms of CO2 electrochemical reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    17. Ajoma, Emmanuel & Saira, & Sungkachart, Thanarat & Ge, Jiachao & Le-Hussain, Furqan, 2020. "Water-saturated CO2 injection to improve oil recovery and CO2 storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Ayomikun Bello & Anastasia Ivanova & Alexey Cheremisin, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of the Role of CO 2 Foam EOR in the Reduction of Carbon Footprint in the Petroleum Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Stančin, H. & Mikulčić, H. & Wang, X. & Duić, N., 2020. "A review on alternative fuels in future energy system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    20. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:432-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.