IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v36y2019i3p1751-1783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linguistic Information Quality in Customers' Forward‐Looking Disclosures and Suppliers' Investment Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Can Chen
  • Jeong‐Bon Kim
  • Minghai Wei
  • Hao Zhang

Abstract

This study examines whether and how linguistic information quality (measured by readability) of customer firms' management earnings forecast reports (MEFRs) affects supplier firms' investment quality (measured by investment efficiency). Our analyses reveal that supplier investment efficiency is positively associated with the average linguistic information quality of customers' prior MEFRs, and the positive association between supplier investment efficiency and customer MEFRs' numerical information quality is stronger in supplier firms with more readable customer MEFRs. Our analyses also reveal that higher linguistic information quality of customer MEFRs improves the monitoring of supplier firms by their outside stakeholders, such as institutional investors and financial analysts, and ameliorates the negative impact of suppliers' customer‐dependence on their investment efficiency. Our results suggest that greater linguistic information quality of a customer firm's forward‐looking disclosures is associated with higher‐quality investments made by its suppliers along the supply chain. Qualité linguistique des informations prospectives communiquées par les clients et décisions des fournisseurs en matière d'investissement Les auteurs se demandent si la qualité linguistique des informations — selon le critère de la lisibilité — que communiquent les sociétés clientes (les clients) dans les rapports de la direction sur les prévisions de résultats (RDPR) influe sur la qualité des investissements des sociétés fournisseurs (les fournisseurs) — selon le critère de l'efficience — et, le cas échéant, comment s'exerce cette influence. Leurs analyses révèlent que l'efficience de l'investissement du fournisseur est en relation positive avec la qualité linguistique moyenne des informations communiquées dans les RDPR précédents des clients, et que la relation positive entre l'efficience de l'investissement du fournisseur et la qualité des informations numériques des RDPR du client est plus marquée chez les fournisseurs dont les clients produisent des RDPR plus lisibles. Leurs analyses révèlent également que la qualité plus élevée des informations communiquées dans les RDPR des clients permet aux parties prenantes externes comme les investisseurs institutionnels et les analystes financiers d'effectuer un meilleur suivi des fournisseurs, et qu'elle atténue l'incidence négative de la dépendance des fournisseurs à l’égard des clients sur l'efficience de l'investissement. Les résultats obtenus semblent indiquer qu'une plus grande qualité linguistique des informations prospectives communiquées par un client est associée à une plus grande qualité des investissements des fournisseurs de la chaîne logistique.

Suggested Citation

  • Can Chen & Jeong‐Bon Kim & Minghai Wei & Hao Zhang, 2019. "Linguistic Information Quality in Customers' Forward‐Looking Disclosures and Suppliers' Investment Decisions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1751-1783, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:3:p:1751-1783
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1997. "Industry costs of equity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 153-193, February.
    2. R. Glenn Hubbard, 1998. "Capital-Market Imperfections and Investment," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 193-225, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    2. Yingying Xin & Xiao Zeng & Zhengying Luo, 2022. "Customers' tone in MD&A disclosure and suppliers' inventory efficiency: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3833-3853, December.
    3. Li, Yanqiong & He, Jie & Chan, Kam C., 2021. "Information transmission along supply chains: Stock price reaction of suppliers upon a customer's release of qualitative risk information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Kuo Zhou & Xianghui Jin & Xinru Li & Yunqing Tao, 2024. "Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 274-291, January.
    5. Sun, Zeyu & Yang, Ge & Bai, Haichen, 2023. "The spillover effect of customers' financial risk on suppliers' conservative reporting: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Changyun Wang & Chenyu Wang & Weixing Wu, 2023. "Customers' stock price crash risk and suppliers' investment inefficiency: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5069-5092, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sualihu, Mohammed Aminu & Rankin, Michaela & Haman, Janto, 2021. "The role of equity compensation in reducing inefficient investment in labor," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Biljana N. Adebambo & Xuemin (Sterling) Yan, 2018. "Investor Overconfidence, Firm Valuation, and Corporate Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5349-5369, November.
    3. I-Ju Chen & Shin-Hung Lin, 2013. "Managerial Optimism, Investment Efficiency, and Firm Valuation," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 17(3-4), pages 295-340, September.
    4. Malcolm Baker & Jeremy C. Stein & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2003. "When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(3), pages 969-1005.
    5. Choi, Paul Moon Sub & Chung, Chune Young & Liu, Chang, 2018. "Self-attribution of overconfident CEOs and asymmetric investment-cash flow sensitivity," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Rajkovic, Tijana, 2020. "Lead independent directors and investment efficiency," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Hu, Shing-yang & Lin, Yueh-Hsiang & Lai, Christine W., 2016. "The effect of overvaluation on investment and accruals: The role of information," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 181-201.
    8. Attig, Najah & Cleary, Sean & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2012. "Institutional investment horizon and investment–cash flow sensitivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1164-1180.
    9. Chen, Zhihong & Huang, Yuan & Kusnadi, Yuanto & John Wei, K.C., 2017. "The real effect of the initial enforcement of insider trading laws," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 687-709.
    10. Najah Attig & Sean Cleary & Sadok Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami, 2014. "Corporate Legitimacy and Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 297-314, May.
    11. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2022. "CEO power and the likelihood of paying dividends: Effect of profitability and cash flow volatility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    12. Biddle, Gary C. & Hilary, Gilles & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2009. "How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2-3), pages 112-131, December.
    13. John A. Doukas & Chansog (Francis) Kim & Christos Pantzalis, 2008. "Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 37(2), pages 303-339, June.
    14. Leonard Leye Li & Gary S. Monroe & Jeff Coulton, 2023. "Managerial litigation risk and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from universal demand laws," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 196-232, March.
    15. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick & Mudalige, Priyantha, 2020. "Do environmentally sustainable practices lead to financially less constrained firms? International evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Fu, Fangjian & Huang, Sheng & Wang, Rong, 2022. "Why Do U.S. Firms Invest Less over Time?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 15-42.
    17. Clarke, Nicholas, 2022. "It's just a matter of time: Abnormal returns after firms stop repurchasing shares," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Frederico Belo & Chen Xue & Lu Zhang, 2010. "Cross-sectional Tobin's Q," NBER Working Papers 16336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. John Rand, 2007. "‘Credit Constraints and Determinants of the Cost of Capital in Vietnamese Manufacturing’," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:3:p:1751-1783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.