IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i3ne1324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functional Family Therapy for families of youth (age 11–18) with behaviour problems: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Julia H. Littell
  • Therese D. Pigott
  • Karianne H. Nilsen
  • Jennifer Roberts
  • Travis K. Labrum

Abstract

Background Functional Family Therapy (FFT) is a short‐term family‐based intervention for youth with behaviour problems. FFT has been widely implemented in the USA and other high‐income countries. It is often described as an evidence‐based program with consistent, positive effects. Objectives We aimed to synthesise the best available data to assess the effectiveness of FFT for families of youth with behaviour problems. Search Methods Searches were performed in 2013–2014 and August 2020. We searched 22 bibliographic databases (including PsycINFO, ERIC, MEDLINE, Science Direct, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, World CAT dissertations and theses, and the Web of Science Core Collection), as well as government policy databanks and professional websites. Reference lists of articles were examined, and experts were contacted to search for missing information. Selection Criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐experimental designs (QEDs) with parallel cohorts and statistical controls for between‐group differences at baseline. Participants were families of young people aged 11–18 with behaviour problems. FFT programmes were compared with usual services, alternative treatment, and no treatment. There were no publication, geographic, or language restrictions. Data Collection and Analysis Two reviewers independently screened 1039 titles and abstracts, read all available study reports, assessed study eligibility, and extracted data onto structured electronic forms. We assessed risks of bias (ROB) using modified versions of the Cochrane ROB tool and the What Works Clearinghouse standards. Where possible, we used random effects models with inverse variance weights to pool results across studies. We used odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean differences for continuous outcomes. We used Hedges g to adjust for small sample sizes. We assessed the heterogeneity of effects with χ2 and I2. We produced separate forest plots for conceptually distinct outcomes and for different endpoints (

Suggested Citation

  • Julia H. Littell & Therese D. Pigott & Karianne H. Nilsen & Jennifer Roberts & Travis K. Labrum, 2023. "Functional Family Therapy for families of youth (age 11–18) with behaviour problems: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1324
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1324
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1324?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerry Dwan & Douglas G Altman & Mike Clarke & Carrol Gamble & Julian P T Higgins & Jonathan A C Sterne & Paula R Williamson & Jamie J Kirkham, 2014. "Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Julia H Littell & Aina Winsvold & Arild Bjørndal & Karianne T Hammerstrøm, 2007. "PROTOCOL: Functional Family Therapy for families of youth (age 11‐18) with behaviour problems," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Hogue, Aaron & Dauber, Sarah, 2013. "Assessing fidelity to evidence-based practices in usual care: The example of family therapy for adolescent behavior problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 21-30.
    4. Alison Evans Cuellar & Dhaval M. Dave, 2015. "Causal Effects of Mental Health Treatment on Education Outcomes for Youth in the Justice System," NBER Working Papers 21206, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Limoncelli, Katherine E. & Wolff, Kevin T. & Celinska, Katarzyna, 2019. "The role of parental problems in functional family therapy outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Darnell, Adam J. & Schuler, Megan S., 2015. "Quasi-experimental study of Functional Family Therapy effectiveness for juvenile justice aftercare in a racially and ethnically diverse community sample," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 75-82.
    7. Dave, Dhaval M., 2016. "Causal effects of mental health treatment on education outcomes for youth in the justice systemAuthor-Name: Cuellar, Alison," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 321-339.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waddell, Glen R. & Putz, Jenni, 2022. "What Can We Learn from Student Performance Measures? Identifying Treatment in the Presence of Curves and Letter Grades," IZA Discussion Papers 15321, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Doleac, Jennifer, 2018. "Strategies to Productively Reincorporate the Formerly-Incarcerated into Communities: A Review of the Literature," IZA Discussion Papers 11646, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Watkins, Adam & Tompsett, Carolyn & Diggins, Eileen & Pratt, Mercedes, 2020. "Voluntary uptake and continuation of treatment among court-involved youth: Lessons learned from the implementation of Functional Family Therapy in a community setting," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Mohd Azam, Siti Balqis & Abu Bakar, Siti Hajar & Mohd Yusoff, Jal Zabdi & Abdul Rauf, Siti Hajar, 2021. "A case study on academic and vocational training for child offenders undergoing a multisystemic therapy-based rehabilitation order in Malaysia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Nikolaos Pandis & Padhraig S Fleming & Helen Worthington & Kerry Dwan & Georgia Salanti, 2015. "Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, September.
    6. Pérez-García, María & Sempere-Pérez, Javier & Rodado-Martínez, Juan Vicente & Pina López, David & Llor-Esteban, Bartolomé & Jiménez-Barbero, José Antonio, 2020. "Effectiveness of multifamily therapy for adolescent disruptive behavior in a public institution: A randomized clinical trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    7. Gil Amarilyo & Daniel E Furst & Jennifer M P Woo & Wen Li & Henning Bliddal & Robin Christensen & Simon Tarp, 2016. "Agreements and Discrepancies between FDA Reports and Journal Papers on Biologic Agents Approved for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Research Project," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen & Marie-Louise Kirkegaard Mikkelsen & Anja Ussing & Karen Christina Walker & Jeanett Friis Rohde & Henning Keinke Andersen & Simon Tarp & Mina Nicole Händel, 2022. "Usefulness of Cochrane Reviews in Clinical Guideline Development—A Survey of 585 Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Hoskins, David & Tahir, Peggy & Del Cid, Margareth & Perez-Gualdron, Leyla & Tolou-Shams, Marina, 2020. "Ecological systems in relation to Latinx youth in the juvenile justice system: A narrative literature review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Takeshi Seta & Yoshimitsu Takahashi & Yoshinori Noguchi & Satoru Shikata & Tatsuya Sakai & Kyoko Sakai & Yukitaka Yamashita & Takeo Nakayama, 2017. "Effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of primary gastric cancer in healthy asymptomatic people: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing risk ratio with risk differ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:3:n:e1324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.