IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wea/econth/v10y2022i2p12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian Economics and the Unsuccessful Escape from Old Ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Heise

    (Hamburg University, Germany)

Abstract

The Cambridge Journal of Economics witnessed an important debate between Mark Pernecky and Paul Wojick on the one side and Rod Thomas on the other about the usefulness of Thomas Kuhn's sociology and philosophy of science in explaining why Keynes's revolutionary ideas exposed in the General Theory have been 'lost in translation'. This brief note is an attempt to reconcile Pernecky and Wojick's claim that Keynes's new economics of the General Theory and Walrasian General Equilibrium are incommensurable paradigms in a Kuhnian understanding and Thomas's critique that – if they were incommensurable – Pernecki and Wojick's appraisal of Keynes's paradigm as a better approximation to the 'real world' than Walsrasian General Equilibrium is inconsistent within that very Kuhnian framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Heise, 2022. "The Incommensurability of Keynes's and Walrasian Economics and the Unsuccessful Escape from Old Ideas," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 12-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/the-incommensurability-of-keyness-and-walrasian-economics-and-the-unsuccessful-escape-from-old-ideas/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/2022/02/WEA-ET-10.2-Heise.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heise, Arne, 2020. "Minimum wages and the resilience of neoclassical labour market economics: Some preliminary evidence from Germany," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 77, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    2. Rod Thomas, 0. "Keynes, Kuhn and the sociology of knowledge: a comment on Pernecky and Wojick," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(6), pages 1415-1424.
    3. Mark Pernecky & Paul Wojick, 2019. "The problematic nature and consequences of the effort to force Keynes into the conceptual cul-de-sac of Walrasian economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(3), pages 769-783.
    4. Paul Davidson, 2005. "Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on what Post Keynesianism is and who is a Post Keynesian," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 393-408.
    5. Rod Thomas, 2020. "Keynes, Kuhn and the sociology of knowledge: a comment on Pernecky and Wojick," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(6), pages 1415-1424.
    6. Ron Stanfield, 1974. "Kuhnian Scientific Revolutions and the Keynesian Revolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 97-109, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heise, Arne, 2023. "Keynes and the drunkard under the lamp post: Making sense of Palley," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 103, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    2. Fine, Ben, 2002. "Economics Imperialism and the New Development Economics as Kuhnian Paradigm Shift?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    3. Massimo Cingolani, 2015. "Sylos Labini su Marx: implicazioni per la politica economica (Sylos Labini on Marx: economic policy implications)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 68(269), pages 81-147.
    4. Heise, Arne, 2018. "Postkeynesianismus: Ein heterodoxer Ansatz auf der Suche nach einer Fundierung," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 69, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    5. L. Johnson & Thomas Cate, 2002. "The general theory: Fabrication or revolution? David Laidler, 1999, pp. 377," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(1), pages 87-96, March.
    6. Eduardo Fernández-Huerga & Ana Pardo & Ana Salvador, 2023. "Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 413-443, July.
    7. L. Johnson & Robert Ley & Thomas Cate, 2004. "The concept of equilibrium: A key theoretical element in Keynes' revolution," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(3), pages 222-232, September.
    8. Arnd Kölling, 2022. "Monopsony power and the demand for low-skilled workers," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 377-395, June.
    9. Marc Lavoie, 2020. "Was Hyman Minsky a post-Keynesian economist?," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 85-101, May.
    10. Arne Heise, 2014. "The Future of Economics in a Lakatos–Bourdieu Framework," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 70-93, July.
    11. Matías Vernengo, 2010. "Conversation or monologue? on advising heterodox economists," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 389-396, April.
    12. Victoria Chick, 2013. "The future is open: on open-system theorising in economics," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 3, pages 56-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Teodoro Dario Togati, 2021. "General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the ‘Keynes Versus the Classics’ Dispute," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 273-294, April.
    14. L. Johnson & Thomas Cate, 2006. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936: A Review Article," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 34(1), pages 115-123, March.
    15. Massimo Cingolani, 2008. "Full Employment as a Possible Objective for EU Policy I. A Perspective From the Point of View of The Monetary Circuit," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 55(1), pages 89-114, March.
    16. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Economic Surplus, Social Reproduction, Nurturance and Love," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 19-40, January.
    17. J. E. King, 2012. "Post Keynesians and Others," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 305-319, April.
    18. Finn Olesen, 2013. "Teaching macroeconomics: seeking inspiration from Paul Davidson," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 8, pages 134-149, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Corrado Andini, 2009. "Teaching Keynes’s Principle of Effective Demand within the Real Wage vs. Employment Space," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 209-228, July.
    20. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2014. "The inverted pyramid: A neo-Ricardian view on the economy–environment relationship," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 230-241.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake McMurchie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.