IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/atlecj/v32y2004i3p222-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The concept of equilibrium: A key theoretical element in Keynes' revolution

Author

Listed:
  • L. Johnson
  • Robert Ley
  • Thomas Cate

Abstract

This paper presents Keynes' concept of equilibrium, which was one key theoretical element that constituted the theoretical core of the General Theory and was critical in his attack on the classical model. Keynes' concept of equilibrium differed in structure, content, and purpose from that of the neoclassical orthodoxy. There were four unique features of Keynes' equilibrium and these features all reflect his overriding focus on involuntary unemployment. First, Keynes' equilibrium reflected a purposive function that differed in its maximand and normative content from his predecessors. Second, Keynes' equilibrium reflected the fact that the composition of national income determined the level of aggregate demand, which in turn determined of the equilibrium level of national income and employment. Third, his notion of equilibrium was based on use of the ex ante-ex post analysis. Finally, Keynes' equilibrium presented an alternative view of market-clearing. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Suggested Citation

  • L. Johnson & Robert Ley & Thomas Cate, 2004. "The concept of equilibrium: A key theoretical element in Keynes' revolution," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(3), pages 222-232, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:32:y:2004:i:3:p:222-232
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02299440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02299440
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02299440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    2. Thomas Cate (ed.), 1997. "An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 808.
    3. L. Johnson & Thomas Cate, 2000. "The analytical preconditions for Keynes' theory of money," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 6(1), pages 84-94, February.
    4. Paul M. Sweezy, 1939. "Demand Under Conditions of Oligopoly," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47, pages 568-568.
    5. Teodoro Dario Togati, 2001. "Keynes as the Einstein of Economic Theory," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 117-138, Spring.
    6. Anthony Philip Thirlwall, 1993. "The Renaissance of Keynesian Economics," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 46(186), pages 327-337.
    7. L. Johnson & Robert Ley & Thomas Cate, 2001. "Keynes' theory of money and his attack on the classical model," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 7(4), pages 409-418, November.
    8. Jan Reijnders (ed.), 1997. "Economics and Evolution," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1218.
    9. Laidler,David, 1999. "Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521641739.
    10. Ron Stanfield, 1974. "Kuhnian Scientific Revolutions and the Keynesian Revolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 97-109, March.
    11. Thomas Mayer, 1959. "The Empirical Significance of the Real Balance Effect," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 73(2), pages 275-291.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Johnson & Thomas Cate, 2006. "A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936: A Review Article," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 34(1), pages 115-123, March.
    2. L. Johnson & Thomas Cate, 2002. "The general theory: Fabrication or revolution? David Laidler, 1999, pp. 377," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(1), pages 87-96, March.
    3. Korkut Erturk, 2002. "Revisiting the Old Theory of Cyclical Growth: Harrod, Kaldor cum Schumpeter," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 179-192.
    4. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Peri, Giovanni, 2008. "Immigration and National Wages: Clarifying the Theory and the Empirics," CEPR Discussion Papers 6916, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    6. Das Gupta, Monica & Bongaarts, John & Cleland, John, 2011. "Population, poverty, and sustainable development : a review of the evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5719, The World Bank.
    7. Kutuk, Yasin, 2022. "Inequality convergence: A world-systems theory approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 150-165.
    8. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Lederman, Daniel & Saenz, Laura, 2005. "Innovation and development around the world, 1960-2000," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3774, The World Bank.
    10. Tung Liu & Kui-Wai Li, 2008. "Revisiting Solow’s Decomposition of Economic and Productivity Growth," Working Papers 200805, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2008.
    11. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2017. "Global Dynamics, Capabilities and the Crisis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner (ed.), Foundations of Economic Change, pages 83-106, Springer.
    12. Hadi Sasana & Imam Ghozali, 2017. "The Impact of Fossil and Renewable Energy Consumption on the Economic Growth in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 194-200.
    13. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    14. Jacques Le Cacheux & Vincent Touzé, 2002. "Les modèles d'équilibre général calculable à générations imbriquées. Enjeux, méthodes et résultats," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 80(1), pages 87-113.
    15. Cornelia Serena, PASCA, 2016. "The Human Capital - A Long Term Investment," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 1(4), pages 51-62.
    16. Gordon Cordina, 2004. "Economic Vulnerability And Economic Growth: Some Results From A Neo-Classical Growth Modelling Approach," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 21-39, December.
    17. Sorin Celea & Petre Brezeanu & Ana Petrina Păun, 2013. "Fiscal Discipline within the EU: Comparative Analysis," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 23-30.
    18. Joshua Hall & Robert Lawson, 2008. "Theory and evidence on economic freedom and economic growth: A comment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 15(18), pages 1-6.
    19. Roberto Martino & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2014. "Labour market regulation and fiscal parameters: A structural model for European regions," Working Papers of BETA 2014-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    20. Sodiq Arogundade & Mduduzi Biyase & Hinaunye Eita, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment and Inclusive Human Development in Sub-Saharan African Countries:Does local Economic Conditions Matter?," Economic Development and Well-being Research Group Working Paper Series edwrg-01-2021, University of Johannesburg, College of Business and Economics, revised 2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:32:y:2004:i:3:p:222-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.