IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v13y2018i3p1089-1107n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The geographic distribution of Knowledge Economy (KE) within the European Union (EU)

Author

Listed:
  • Hadad Shahrazad

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania; The Academy of Romanian Scientist, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The business environment is reshaped by knowledge economy which has taken both competitiveness and doing business to a whole new level. Because knowledge economy plays a key role in the creation of welfare it has been classified as an important reliable indicator for comparing world’s economies. The present paper highlights the geographic distribution of knowledge economy at the level of the European Union by means of factorial analysis. Factor analysis, a well-known statistical clustering technique, has been applied on the 28 EU countries (seen in our study as random variables) with an a priori fixed number of two factors. On each variable, the realisations are given by the scores (normalized between 0 and 1) registered for year 2012 on 12 key Knowledge Economy (KE) indices. The resulting factor structure is compared to the standard geographical grouping of EU countries (NorthWest-SouthEast) in present KE literature. SPSS software has been used for the statistical analysis. The highest correlations attained were in terms of the Global Competitiveness Index, World Happiness Index, R&D expenses signifying that they could also act as predictors in evaluating the status of the knowledge economy of a particular country, whereas weaker correlations can be spotted for enterprises selling online, electric energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and others. In the future, the same relationship can be tested to see whether the influences have changed, in the light of new available data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadad Shahrazad, 2018. "The geographic distribution of Knowledge Economy (KE) within the European Union (EU)," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1089-1107, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:1089-1107:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2018-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2018-0025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2018-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Mihaela Dima & Liviu Begu & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Maria Alexandra Maassen, 2018. "The Relationship between the Knowledge Economy and Global Competitiveness in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Wipo, 2013. "Global Innovation Index 2013: Local Dynamics Key to Overcoming Global Innovation Divide," WIPO Economics & Statistics Series, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division, number 2013:gii, April.
    3. Bernard L. Simonin, 1999. "Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 595-623, July.
    4. Martin Falk, 2009. "High-tech exports and economic growth in industrialized countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(10), pages 1025-1028.
    5. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Per Thulin, 2008. "Can countries create comparative advantages? R&D expenditures, high-tech exports and country size in 19 OECD countries, 1981-1999," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 95-111.
    6. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    7. Elena-Madalina Vatamanescu & Bogdan Gabriel Nistoreanu & Andreea Mitan, 2017. "Competition and Consumer Behavior in the Context of the Digital Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 354-354, May.
    8. Caraveli, H. & Tsionas, E.G. & Darzentas, J., 2008. "EU Growth, Convergence and the Knowledge Economy: An Empirical Investigation," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 105-124.
    9. Elena Ryzhkova & Nikolai Prosvirkin, 2015. "Cluster Initiatives as a Competitiveness Factor of Modern Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 21-30.
    10. Yuko Kinoshita, 2000. "R&D and technology spillovers via FDI: Innovation and absorptive capacity," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp163, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    11. Yuko Kinoshita, 2000. "R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 349, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    12. V.M. Dzhukha & A.N. Kokin & A.S. Li & T.Yu. Sinyuk, 2017. "Research and Development Intensity in Business: Russia and EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 64-76.
    13. Mihaela-Cornelia DAN, 2012. "Innovative clusters: a solution for the economic development of Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(9(574)), pages 5-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Edinaldo Tebaldi, 2011. "The Determinants of High-Technology Exports: A Panel Data Analysis," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 39(4), pages 343-353, December.
    3. Krammer, Marius Sorin, 2008. "International R&D spillovers in transition countries: the impact of trade and foreign direct investment," Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers 446, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Duong Hoang Vu & Bruce Dehning & Drahomíra Pavelková, 2023. "Firm life cycle and foreign direct investment spillover effect: The case of the Czech Republic," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 319-340, April.
    5. Jože Damijan & Črt Kostevc & Matija Rojec, 2013. "Global Supply Chains at Work in Central and Eastern European Countries:Impact of FDI on export restructuring and productivity growth," Working Papers of VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics 37, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), VIVES - Research Centre for Regional Economics.
    6. Chatzistamoulou, Nikos & Kounetas, Kostas & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2022. "Technological hierarchies and learning: Spillovers, complexity, relatedness, and the moderating role of absorptive capacity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Sandrine Levasseur, 2006. "Convergence and FDI in an enlarged EU: what can we learn from the experience of cohesion countries for the CEECS?," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2006-12, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    8. Damijan, Jože P. & Kostevc, Crt, 2007. "Knowledge Transfer, Innovation and Growth," Papers DYNREG06, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. Gong, Guan & Keller, Wolfgang, 2003. "Convergence and polarization in global income levels: a review of recent results on the role of international technology diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1055-1079, June.
    10. Lai, Mingyong & Peng, Shuijun & BAO, Qun, 2006. "Technology spillovers, absorptive capacity and economic growth," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 300-320.
    11. Jorge Andrés Vélez Ospina, 2009. "Determinantes de la inversión en innovación en el sector de Bogotá:estimaciones econométricas a nivel de la firma," Revista ESPE - Ensayos Sobre Política Económica, Banco de la República, vol. 27(60), pages 110-167, December.
    12. Jože P. Damijan & Andreja Jaklič & Matija Rojec, 2006. "Do External Knowledge Spillovers Induce Firms’ Innovations? Evidence from Slovenia," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Ana Teresa Tavares & Aurora Teixeira (ed.), Multinationals, Clusters and Innovation, chapter 3, pages 27-47, Palgrave Macmillan.
    13. Neil Foster-McGregor, 2012. "Innovation and Technology Transfer across Countries," wiiw Research Reports 380, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    14. Zhou Wei & Adel Ben Youssef, 2012. "The productivity impact of international technology transfer in China: Empirical investigation on Chinese regions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(2), pages 1590-1603.
    15. Peter, Klara Sabirianova & Svejnar, Jan & Terrell, Katherine, 2004. "Distance to the Efficiency Frontier and FDI Spillovers," IZA Discussion Papers 1332, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. De Fuentes, Claudia & Dutrénit, Gabriela, 2011. "SMEs´ absorptive capacities and large firms´ knowledge spillovers: Micro evidence from Mexico," Papers in Innovation Studies 2011/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    17. Hoi Le & Richard Pomfret, 2011. "Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in Vietnam: horizontal or vertical spillovers?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 183-201.
    18. Piva, Mariacristina., 2004. "The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in developing countries : a survey of theoretical models and empirical studies," ILO Working Papers 993666903402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Elisa Galeotti, 2009. "Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Geographical Proximity with Foreign Investors? Evidence from the Privatization of the Czech Glass Industry," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 026-047, March.
    20. Hanousek, Jan & Kocenda, Evzen & Maurel, Mathilde, 2011. "Direct and indirect effects of FDI in emerging European markets: A survey and meta-analysis," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-322, September.
    21. Juraj Stančík, 2009. "FDI spillovers in the Czech Republic: takeovers vs. greenfields," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 369, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:1089-1107:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.