IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/founma/v7y2015i1p129-142n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generational Differences In Organizational Justice Perceptions: An Exploratory Investigation Across Three Generational Cohorts

Author

Listed:
  • Ledimo Ophillia

    (University of South Africa, Department of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, South Africa)

Abstract

Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts regarding their career stages in organizations, relatively few empirical investigations have been conducted to understand cohorts’ perceptions. Hence, there is paucity of studies that explored differences on the construct organizational justice across generational cohorts. The objective of this study was to explore the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the organizational justice measurement instrument (OJMI). Data was collected through the administration of OJMI to a random sample size of organizational employees (n = 289). Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were conducted to interpret the data. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of organizational justice. In terms of contributions and practical implications, insight gained from the findings may be used in proposing organizational development interventions to manage multigenerational employees as well as to conduct future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ledimo Ophillia, 2015. "Generational Differences In Organizational Justice Perceptions: An Exploratory Investigation Across Three Generational Cohorts," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 129-142, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:129-142:n:11
    DOI: 10.1515/fman-2015-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2015-0031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/fman-2015-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magoshi, Emiko & Chang, Eunmi, 2009. "Diversity management and the effects on employees' organizational commitment: Evidence from Japan and Korea," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 31-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ?lhan Kacire & Mehmet Kurtulmus & H¨¹seyin Karabiyik, 2015. "The Effect Of Perce?ved D?vers?ty Cl?mate On General Sat?sfact?on Of Un?vers?ty Students," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 20-31, June.
    2. Claudia Toma & Annabelle Martin, 2024. "Diversity management approaches for organizational justice: Insights from Belgian hospitals," Working Papers CEB 24-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Meng-Shan Tsai & Chi-Cheng Chang, 2014. "Exploring the Effects of Individual Emotional Regulation, Interpersonal Interaction, and Collaboration on Learning Behavior in Technology Industry," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(7), pages 844-861, July.
    4. Bignya Patnaik & Mahendra Kumar Shukla, 2021. "Diversity and Equality Management System and Perceived Organisational Performance: A Mediating Role of Organisational Citizenship Behaviour," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 215-234, May.
    5. Kim, Ji Sung & Faerman, Sue R., 2013. "Exploring the relationship between culture and family-friendly programs (FFPs) in the Republic of Korea," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 505-521.
    6. Petia Genkova, 2018. "Differences of Diversity Attitudes between Employees with and without an Immigration Background: The Case of Germany," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 174-186.
    7. Natália Vraňaková & Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Andrea Chlpeková, 2021. "Sustainable Human Resource Management and Generational Diversity: The Importance of the Age Management Pillars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Cooke, Fang Lee. & Brown, Ronald., 2015. "The regulation of non-standard forms of employment in China, Japan and the Republic of Korea," ILO Working Papers 994888163402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. Silvia Sinicropi & Damiano Cortese, 2021. "(Re)Thinking diversity within sustainable development: A systematic mapping study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 299-309, January.
    10. Harald Conrad & Hendrik Meyer-Ohle, 2022. "Training Regimes and Diversity: Experiences of Young Foreign Employees in Japanese Headquarters," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(2), pages 199-216, April.
    11. Lee, Hun Whee & Choi, Jin Nam & Kim, Seongsu, 2018. "Does gender diversity help teams constructively manage status conflict? An evolutionary perspective of status conflict, team psychological safety, and team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 187-199.
    12. Stacey Fitzsimmons & Mustafa F. Özbilgin & David C. Thomas & Stella Nkomo, 2023. "Equality, diversity, and inclusion in international business: A review and research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1402-1422, October.
    13. Chanda Chansa Thelma, 2024. "Factors Leading to Early Marriages in Selected Communities of Lusaka District in Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 192-205, January.
    14. Nanik Suryani & Ade Rustiana & WisudaniRahmaningtyas, 2020. "Diversity perspectives in teamwork: Is the difference Importance?," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(1), pages 24-30, January.
    15. Tahir Hameed & Peter von Staden & Ki-Seok Kwon, 2019. "Impediments to Sustaining South Korea’s Economic Development: Pathologies of Cooperation in Intra-Team Dynamics of Technology Commercialization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:129-142:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.