IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cjotou/v5y2016i1p5-20n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Destination Quality Perception in the Context of Different Behavioural Characteristics of Visitors

Author

Listed:
  • Ryglová Kateřina

    (Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vajčnerová Ida

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Šácha Jakub

    (Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Visitors’ perceptions of the quality of a tourism destination are fundamental for effective destination management and marketing. This paper deals with the topic of destination quality from the viewpoint of demand, i.e. from the viewpoint of a destination visitor. The results of perceiving the destination quality partial factors in the context of different behavioural characteristics of a visitor are presented, particularly, the way how spending and organizing a holiday influences the perception of destination quality factors (Kruskal-Wallis test). The research nineteen factors were designed on the basis of contemporary theories and on qualitative research. Some important quality aspects related to tourism were identified and assessed for the Czech population. The primary data were obtained through a questionnaire survey with quota sampling (n = 1097). The dependence of destination quality perception on the way of spending the holiday was revealed in the case of 8 factors (e.g., Availability of transportation to the destination, Availability and quality of information; Additional infrastructure, Sense of security, Destination cleanliness, Uniqueness of destination, Price level in the destination, Cultural monuments). The significant differences identified among various groups of respondents are described in detail in this study. The research findings contribute to better understanding of the behavioural mechanism and can be used by destination managers to design communication strategies for different segments of consumers for individual destinations to improve their competiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryglová Kateřina & Vajčnerová Ida & Šácha Jakub, 2016. "Destination Quality Perception in the Context of Different Behavioural Characteristics of Visitors," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 5-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cjotou:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:5-20:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/cjot-2016-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2016-0001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cjot-2016-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Žabkar, Vesna & Brenčič, Maja Makovec & Dmitrović, Tanja, 2010. "Modelling perceived quality, visitor satisfaction and behavioural intentions at the destination level," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 537-546.
    2. Sara Campo-Martínez & Joan B. Garau-Vadell, 2010. "The Generation of Tourism Destination Satisfaction," Tourism Economics, , vol. 16(3), pages 461-475, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ryglová Kateřina & Rašovská Ida & Šácha Jakub, 2017. "Rural Tourism – Evaluating the Quality of Destination," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 9(4), pages 769-788, December.
    2. Parmita Saha & Atanu Nath, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework of Festival Visitors’ Behavioral Intentions," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    3. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos & Simeli, Ioanna, 2017. "Delegate satisfaction from conference service quality and its impact on future behavioural intentions," MPRA Paper 93933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Rui Guo & Xiaoying Liu & Hakjun Song, 2021. "Structural Relationships among Strategic Experiential Modules, Motivation, Serious Leisure, Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Bicycle Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Mehran, Javaneh & Olya, Hossein GT., 2020. "Canal boat tourism: Application of complexity theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Breitsohl, Jan & Garrod, Brian, 2016. "Assessing tourists' cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to an unethical destination incident," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 209-220.
    7. Landmann, Dirk Hauke & Kimmig, Sabrina & Lagerkvist, Carl Johan, 2018. "Understanding the relationship between trainers’ qualification, learning success and satisfaction for agricultural capacity development in rural Bihar," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 273052, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    8. Feng Xu & Wenxia Niu & Shuaishuai Li & Yuli Bai, 2020. "The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    9. Moore, Susan A. & Rodger, Kate & Taplin, Ross H., 2017. "Developing a better understanding of the complexities of visitor loyalty to Karijini National Park, Western Australia," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 20-28.
    10. Ida Rašovská & Marketa Kubickova & Kateřina Ryglová, 2021. "Importance–performance analysis approach to destination management," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 777-794, June.
    11. Liu, Yuqing & Schuberth, Florian & Liu, Yide & Henseler, Jörg, 2022. "Modeling and assessing forged concepts in tourism and hospitality using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 221-230.
    12. Su, Lujun & Swanson, Scott R. & Chen, Xiaohong, 2016. "The effects of perceived service quality on repurchase intentions and subjective well-being of Chinese tourists: The mediating role of relationship quality," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 82-95.
    13. Antonino Mario Oliveri & Gabriella Polizzi & Anna Maria Parroco, 2019. "Measuring Tourist Satisfaction Through a Dual Approach: The 4Q Methodology," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 361-382, November.
    14. Vašaničová Petra & Litavcová Eva & Jenčová Sylvia, 2018. "Occupancy of the Slovak Accommodation Establishments by Foreign Tourists," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 133-152, December.
    15. Bryce, Derek & Curran, Ross & O'Gorman, Kevin & Taheri, Babak, 2015. "Visitors' engagement and authenticity: Japanese heritage consumption," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 571-581.
    16. Prajitmutita, Lyn Manassannan & Perényi, à ron & Prentice, Catherine, 2016. "Quality, Value? – Insights into Medical Tourists’ Attitudes and Behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 207-216.
    17. Yoo Ri Kim & Anyu Liu & Allan M Williams, 2022. "Competitiveness in the visitor economy: A systematic literature review," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 817-842, May.
    18. Castellano, Rosalia & Chelli, Francesco M. & Ciommi, Mariateresa & Musella, Gaetano & Punzo, Gennaro & Salvati, Luca, 2020. "Trahit sua quemque voluptas. The multidimensional satisfaction of foreign tourists visiting Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Chia-Wen Lee & Ching Li, 2019. "The Process of Constructing a Health Tourism Destination Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Ida Vajčnerová & Jakub Šácha & Kateřina Ryglová & Pavel Žiaran, 2016. "Using the Cluster Analysis and the Principal Component Analysis in Evaluating the Quality of a Destination," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 677-682.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tourism; destination quality; factors of destination quality; visitors’ perception; behavioural aspects;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cjotou:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:5-20:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.