IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v96y2020i1p56-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of a Water Right Retirement Program at Conserving Water

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvetan Tsvetanov
  • Dietrich Earnhart

Abstract

This study employs a difference-in-differences framework to assess the effectiveness of the 2008–2012 pilot phase of the Kansas Water Right Transition Assistance Program at reducing either groundwater or surface water use. We distinguish between two program components: creek subbasins and designated High Priority Areas. Results demonstrate that water right retirement in the High Priority Areas substantially reduced groundwater use. Regardless of the program component, we find no effect on surface water use. Our conclusions are robust to various specifications. This study is the first to directly estimate the effect of water right retirement or any form of restriction on irrigation-related water rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvetan Tsvetanov & Dietrich Earnhart, 2020. "The Effectiveness of a Water Right Retirement Program at Conserving Water," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 96(1), pages 56-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:96:y:2020:i:1:p:56-74
    Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.96.1.56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/96/1/56
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. R. Aaron Hrozencik & Jordan F. Suter & Paul J. Ferraro & Nathan Hendricks, 2024. "Social comparisons and groundwater use: Evidence from Colorado and Kansas," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(2), pages 946-966, March.
    2. Dietrich Earnhart & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2023. "Adapting to water restrictions: Intensive versus extensive adaptation over time differentiated by water right seniority," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1458-1490, October.
    3. Jeong, Dawoon & Sesmero, Juan Pablo, 2021. "Do changing weather patterns warrant more flexibility in cap-and-trade policy for irrigation water conservation? A case study in Mexico," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314081, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Andrew B. Rosenberg, 2020. "Targeting of Water Rights Retirement Programs: Evidence from Kansas," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(5), pages 1425-1447, October.
    5. Rouhi Rad, Mani & Suter, Jordan F. & Manning, Dale & Goemans, Christopher, 2020. "Subsidies vs. subsidies in the conservation of common property resources," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304401, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Manning, Dale T. & Rad, Mani Rouhi & Suter, Jordan F. & Goemans, Christopher & Xiang, Zaichen & Bailey, Ryan, 2020. "Non-market valuation in integrated assessment modeling: The benefits of water right retirement," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Lee, Juhee & Hendricks, Nathan, 2022. "Irrigation Decisions in Response to Groundwater Salinity in Kansas," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(3), September.
    8. Sears, Louis S. & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Walter, M. Todd, 2020. "Groundwater Under Open Access: A Structural Model of the Dynamic Common Pool Extraction Game," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304276, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Bertone Oehninger, Ernst & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia, 2021. "Property rights and groundwater management in the High Plains Aquifer," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:96:y:2020:i:1:p:56-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.