This article presents tests of rational expectations using the Profit Impact of Market Strategy survey of executives of large corporations. Unlike past surveys, the respondents have a financial interest in being accurate. Executives do not have rational expectations concerning output prices, input prices, wages, or product demand. For example, executives predicting price increases 5 percent above the average of other companies had actual price increases only about 0.5 percent above the mean. Executives' expectations also give too much weight to their own recent experience and do not use all available information. Expectations are difficult to predict; nevertheless, simple adaptive models do almost as well as more complicated specifications. Copyright 1993 by University of Chicago Press.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Chicago Press in its journal Journal of Business.
Volume (Year): 66 (1993) Issue (Month): 2 (April) Pages: 271-93 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)