IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v19y2019i3p77-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding Common Ground: Negotiating Downstream Rights to Harvest with Upstream Responsibilities to Protect—Dairies, Berries, and Shellfish in the Salish Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Emma S. Norman

Abstract

Harvesting shellfish is an important cultural and economic activity for coastal Indigenous communities throughout the Salish Sea. However, for the Lhaq’temish People of Lummi Nation, upstream agricultural pollution has rendered this inherent right impossible for almost two decades. In an attempt to reopen the shellfish beds, Lummi Nation leaders developed the Portage Bay Partnership, which aims to address the upstream pollution problem through relationship building and shared connection to place. The partnership brings to light several key points: (1) efforts to integrate different community views of place to develop a relational approach to shared water governance, (2) the use of legal tools to incentivize relationship building, and (3) the continued challenges associated with competing governance frameworks and worldviews. This partnership opposes a system that has been set up to systemically exclude or disenfranchise Indigenous communities, replacing a governance model based on acquired rights with one that prioritizes relationships and responsibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma S. Norman, 2019. "Finding Common Ground: Negotiating Downstream Rights to Harvest with Upstream Responsibilities to Protect—Dairies, Berries, and Shellfish in the Salish Sea," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 77-97, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:77-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/glep_a_00516
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley C. Karkkainen, 2004. "Post-Sovereign Environmental Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 4(1), pages 72-96, February.
    2. Todd A. Eisenstadt & Karleen Jones West, 2017. "Indigenous Belief Systems, Science, and Resource Extraction: Climate Change Attitudes in Ecuador," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(1), pages 40-58, February.
    3. Cristina Yumie Aoki Inoue, 2018. "Worlding the Study of Global Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene: Indigenous Voices from the Amazon," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 18(4), pages 25-42, November.
    4. François Molle, 2009. "River basin planning and management," Post-Print hal-03061694, HAL.
    5. Alice Cohen & Emma S. Norman, 2018. "Renegotiating the Columbia River Treaty: Transboundary Governance and Indigenous Rights," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 18(4), pages 4-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate J. Neville & Glen Coulthard, 2019. "Transformative Water Relations: Indigenous Interventions in Global Political Economies," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Gary Brierley & Ian Fuller & Gary Williams & Dan Hikuroa & Alice Tilley, 2022. "Re-Imagining Wild Rivers in Aotearoa New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Yinghong Li & Jiaxin Tong & Longfei Wang, 2020. "Full Implementation of the River Chief System in China: Outcome and Weakness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Madeline Whetung, 2019. "(En)gendering Shoreline Law: Nishnaabeg Relational Politics Along the Trent Severn Waterway," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 16-32, August.
    5. Jing Zhu & Shenghong Kang & Wenwu Zhao & Qiujie Li & Xinyuan Xie & Xiangping Hu, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Food–Energy–Water Nexus: Progress and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. David Hess, 2009. "Catalyzing Corporate Commitment to Combating Corruption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 781-790, October.
    7. Kenji Kitamura & Chigusa Nakagawa & Tetsu Sato, 2018. "Formation of a Community of Practice in the Watershed Scale, with Integrated Local Environmental Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Blackman, Allen & Veit, Peter, 2018. "Titled Amazon Indigenous Communities Cut Forest Carbon Emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 56-67.
    9. Nygren, Anja, 2021. "Water and power, water’s power: State-making and socionature shaping volatile rivers and riverine people in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    10. Bernard O. Barraqué & Patrick Laigneau & Rosa Maria Formiga-Johnsson, 2018. "The Rise and Fall of the French Agences de l’Eau: From German-Type Subsidiarität to State Control," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Craynon, John R. & Sarver, Emily A. & Robertson, David P., 2013. "Could a public ecology approach help resolve the mountaintop mining controversy?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 44-49.
    12. Alice Cohen, 2012. "Rescaling Environmental Governance: Watersheds as Boundary Objects at the Intersection of Science, Neoliberalism, and Participation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(9), pages 2207-2224, September.
    13. Verónica Iñiguez-Gallardo & Joseph Tzanopoulos, 2023. "Perceptions of Climate Adaptation and Mitigation: An Approach from Societies in Southern Ecuadorian Andes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Charles Chester & William Moomaw, 2008. "A taxonomy of collaborative governance: a guide to understanding the diversity of international and domestic conservation accords," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 187-206, September.
    15. Fang, Yiping & Deng, Wei, 2011. "The critical scale and section management of cascade hydropower exploitation in Southwestern China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5944-5953.
    16. Raakjaer, Jesper & Leeuwen, Judith van & Tatenhove, Jan van & Hadjimichael, Maria, 2014. "Ecosystem-based marine management in European regional seas calls for nested governance structures and coordination—A policy brief," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 373-381.
    17. Farhad Mukhtarov & Andrea Gerlak, 2014. "Epistemic forms of integrated water resources management: towards knowledge versatility," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(2), pages 101-120, June.
    18. Samira Idllalène, 2013. "Re-thinking coastal adaptation strategy: from SLR to land risks—Can the water policy fill the coastal strategy vacuum? The case of Morocco," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 713-725, October.
    19. Valérie Nicollier & Marcos Eduardo Cordeiro Bernardes & Asher Kiperstok, 2022. "What Governance Failures Reveal about Water Resources Management in a Municipality of Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    20. Van Herzele, Ann & Ceuterick, Melissa & Buizer, Marleen & Leone, Michael, 2019. "Ecosystem Services as (Co-)performative Practice: Experiences from Integrated Water Management in Flanders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 29-38.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:77-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.