Highway Investment Benefits under Alternative Pricing Regimes
AbstractWe examine the bias involved in adopting inefficient reference states as the basis for appraising road investments. User benefits from highway schemes are estimated with respect to both unpriced networks and ones subject to marginal cost (congestion) pricing on all links. We show from the analysis of several policies defined on a Cardiff network how that the difference between these measures depends on: the parameters of the demand and user cost functions and the highway policy under test. While the value of an investment under free use will typically exceed that under congestion pricing, under certain conditions, the reverse may occur. We have used "single link", "binary link", and equilibrium network models to interpret this behaviour in terms of the quantity and composition of generated traffic associated with capacity expansion policies and, in particular, the contributions from route substitution and induced traffic. ? The London School of Economics and the University of Bath 2001
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by London School of Economics and University of Bath in its journal Journal of Transport Economics and Policy.
Volume (Year): 35 (2001)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.bath.ac.uk/e-journals/jtep
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Lo, Hong K. & Szeto, W.Y., 2005. "Road pricing modeling for hyper-congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 705-722.
- Chu, Chih-Peng & Tsai, Jyh-Fa, 2008. "The optimal location and road pricing for an elevated road in a corridor," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 842-856, June.
- Edward Calthrop & Bruno De Borger & Stef Proost, 2008.
"Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies,"
Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers
ces0818, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
- Calthrop, Edward & De Borger, Bruno & Proost, Stef, 2010. "Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 850-869, August.
- CALTHROP, Edward & DE BORGER, Bruno & PROOST, Stef, 2008. "Cost-benefit analysis of transport investments in distorted economies," Working Papers 2008011, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.