IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v40y2017i4p449-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Bid-rent Land Use Model of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model of land use and transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Clay
  • Arnold Valdez

Abstract

Integrated land use/transportation forecasting models add significant policy and infrastructure alternatives analysis capabilities to the urban planning process. The financial, time, and staff requirements to develop these models has put them beyond the reach of most small to medium sized urban areas. This paper presents the land use allocation submodel of the Simple, Efficient, Elegant, and Effective model of land use and transportation (SE3M), an integrated land use and transportation forecasting model founded upon Economic Base Theory and Bid-rent Theory. The Bid-rent Land Use Model (BLUM) is an agent based, spatial competition model utilizing unique utility curves for willingness to pay and incomes for budget constrained abilities to pay for each agent. The model structure, estimation, calibration, implementation, and validation are presented. With a single year of land use data available, the validation approach used the Kappa Index of Agreement to spatially check model outputs against base year control data while controlling for agreement by chance. The U.S. territory of Guam is used as the case study/proof of concept implementation for this model framework. Once calibrated, BLUM could solve the spatial competition problem on Guam in less than two minutes of processing time with over 90% accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez, 2017. "The Bid-rent Land Use Model of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 449-464, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:4:p:449-464
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2017.1300239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2017.1300239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2017.1300239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J D Hunt & D C Simmonds, 1993. "Theory and Application of an Integrated Land-Use and Transport Modelling Framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(2), pages 221-244, April.
    2. Michael Clay & Wade White & Paul Holley & Mark Curry, 2012. "Data Development for Implementing Integrated Land-use and Transportation Forecasting Models in Medium-sized Metropolitan Planning Organizations," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 263-274.
    3. Michael J. Clay, 2010. "Developing an integrated land-use/transportation model for small to medium-sized cities: case study of Montgomery, Alabama," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 679-693, September.
    4. Chang, Justin Sueun & Mackett, Roger Laurence, 2006. "A bi-level model of the relationship between transport and residential location," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 123-146, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez & Alex Norr & Samuel M. Otterstrom, 2017. "Uncertainty analysis of the large zone economic module of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model (SEM) of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 855-874, November.
    2. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2000. "A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 375-394, June.
    3. Huai, Yue & Lo, Hong K. & Ng, Ka Fai, 2021. "Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 99-118.
    4. Shuhong Ma & Yan Zhang & Chaoxu Sun, 2019. "Optimization and Application of Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model in Small- and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.
    6. Simmonds, David & Feldman, Olga, 2011. "Alternative approaches to spatial modelling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 2-11.
    7. Tschangho John Kim & Jinsoo You & Seung-kwan Lee, 1998. "An integrated urban systems model with GIS," ERSA conference papers ersa98p374, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Vincent Viguié, 2015. "Cross-commuting and housing prices in a polycentric modeling of cities," Working Papers 2015.09, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    9. Giuseppe Francesco Gori & Renato Paniccià, 2015. "A structural multisectoral model with new economic geography linkages for Tuscany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 175-196, November.
    10. Johnston, Robert & de la Barra, Thomas, 2000. "Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Linking Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0f97v7sn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Merlin, Louis A. & Levine, Jonathan & Grengs, Joe, 2018. "Accessibility analysis for transportation projects and plans," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 35-48.
    12. Sakai, Takanori & Kawamura, Kazuya & Hyodo, Tetsuro, 2019. "Evaluation of the spatial pattern of logistics facilities using urban logistics land-use and traffic simulator," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 145-160.
    13. Sajad Shiravi & Ming Zhong & Seyed Ahad Beykaei & John Douglas Hunt & John E Abraham, 2015. "An assessment of the utility of LiDAR data in extracting base-year floorspace and a comparison with the census-based approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(4), pages 708-729, July.
    14. Christopher J Pettit & Scott Hawken & Carmela Ticzon & Simone Z Leao & Aida E Afrooz & Scott N Lieske & Tess Canfield & Hrishi Ballal & Carl Steinitz, 2019. "Breaking down the silos through geodesign – Envisioning Sydney’s urban future," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1387-1404, October.
    15. Rodier, Caroline J., 2004. "A Multi-Objective Analysis of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt78q94796, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Johnston, Robert A., 1994. "The Evaluation of Multimodal Transportation Systems for Economic Efficiency and Other Impacts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4f87125z, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Optimal housing supply in a bid-rent equilibrium framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 62-78.
    18. Wanle Wang & Ming Zhong & John Douglas Hunt, 2019. "Analysis of the Wider Economic Impact of a Transport Infrastructure Project Using an Integrated Land Use Transport Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Johnston, Robert A. & de la Barra, Tomas, 2000. "Comprehensive regional modeling for long-range planning: linking integrated urban models and geographic information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-136, February.
    20. Ng, Ka Fai & Lo, Hong K., 2017. "On joint railway and housing development: Housing-led versus railway-led schemes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 464-488.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:4:p:449-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.