IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v40y2017i8p855-874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty analysis of the large zone economic module of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model (SEM) of land use and transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Clay
  • Arnold Valdez
  • Alex Norr
  • Samuel M. Otterstrom

Abstract

Integrated land use and transportation forecasting models are used to assist decision-makers in the policy analysis and infrastructure capital improvement selection process. These models are typically given precise, point-estimate inputs that are mathematically linked, through a series of submodels, to forecasted model outputs. These point-estimate inputs represent an unrealistic level of precision and a growing body of research is focusing on statistical techniques to model uncertainty in model inputs and parameters and tracking the effects of this uncertainty through the various submodels to the model outputs. This paper presents an uncertainty analysis of the Large Zone Economic Module (LZEM) of the Simple, Efficient, Elegant, and Effective Model (SE3M) of land use and transportation. Three case-study implementations of the model are used to obtain a reasonably sound approximation of how uncertainty affects LZEM outputs: Guam, Puerto Rico, and Oahu, Hawaii. These case studies were the subject of an early transferability study with SE3M and were selected based on both their insularity and diverse physical, economic, and demographic geographies. The findings of this research demonstrate that LZEM has a robust framework, with the potential to estimate error both in the positive and negative direction under uncertain input/parameter conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez & Alex Norr & Samuel M. Otterstrom, 2017. "Uncertainty analysis of the large zone economic module of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model (SEM) of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 855-874, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:8:p:855-874
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2017.1355881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2017.1355881
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2017.1355881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J D Hunt & D C Simmonds, 1993. "Theory and Application of an Integrated Land-Use and Transport Modelling Framework," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 20(2), pages 221-244, April.
    2. Michael J. Clay & Robert A. Johnston, 2005. "Univariate Uncertainty Analysis of an Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model: MEPLAN," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 149-165, March.
    3. Michael J. Clay, 2010. "Developing an integrated land-use/transportation model for small to medium-sized cities: case study of Montgomery, Alabama," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(8), pages 679-693, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael J. Clay & Arnold Valdez, 2017. "The Bid-rent Land Use Model of the simple, efficient, elegant, and effective model of land use and transportation," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 449-464, May.
    2. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2000. "A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 375-394, June.
    3. Shuhong Ma & Yan Zhang & Chaoxu Sun, 2019. "Optimization and Application of Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model in Small- and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Simmonds, David & Feldman, Olga, 2011. "Alternative approaches to spatial modelling," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 2-11.
    5. Tschangho John Kim & Jinsoo You & Seung-kwan Lee, 1998. "An integrated urban systems model with GIS," ERSA conference papers ersa98p374, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Giuseppe Francesco Gori & Renato Paniccià, 2015. "A structural multisectoral model with new economic geography linkages for Tuscany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 175-196, November.
    7. Johnston, Robert & de la Barra, Thomas, 2000. "Comprehensive Regional Modeling for Long-Range Planning: Linking Integrated Urban Models and Geographic Information Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0f97v7sn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Merlin, Louis A. & Levine, Jonathan & Grengs, Joe, 2018. "Accessibility analysis for transportation projects and plans," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 35-48.
    9. Sakai, Takanori & Kawamura, Kazuya & Hyodo, Tetsuro, 2019. "Evaluation of the spatial pattern of logistics facilities using urban logistics land-use and traffic simulator," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 145-160.
    10. Rodier, Caroline J., 2004. "A Multi-Objective Analysis of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt78q94796, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Johnston, Robert A., 1994. "The Evaluation of Multimodal Transportation Systems for Economic Efficiency and Other Impacts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4f87125z, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Wanle Wang & Ming Zhong & John Douglas Hunt, 2019. "Analysis of the Wider Economic Impact of a Transport Infrastructure Project Using an Integrated Land Use Transport Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Clay, Michael J & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Large Real Estate Developments, Spatial Uncertainty, And Integrated Land Use And Transportation Modeling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt00f8w5pc, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Johnston, Robert A. & de la Barra, Tomas, 2000. "Comprehensive regional modeling for long-range planning: linking integrated urban models and geographic information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-136, February.
    15. Rodier, Caroline, 2004. "A Multi-Objective Analysis of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8cv746gq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Keirstead, James & Jennings, Mark & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2012. "A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3847-3866.
    17. Khan, Azhar Shah (James) & Abraham, John E. & Hunt, John Douglas, 2002. "Agent-based micro-simulation of business establishments," ERSA conference papers ersa02p435, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Sylvie Occelli & Giovanni A. Rabino, 1998. "Simulating a Post-Fordist urban system: Results from the PF.US model," ERSA conference papers ersa98p300, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:8:p:855-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.