IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v54y2016i19p5916-5931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperative inventory planning in a distribution network

Author

Listed:
  • Lamia Triqui Sari
  • Jean-Claude Hennet

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of optimal ordering and collaborative inventory management in a distribution network as a two-stage decision problem. In the first stage, when demand is uncertain, the retailers (sellers) order the products from a warehouse. Then, when demand becomes known with certainty, retailers may exchange their products to better match local demands. Sellers should determine their optimal order quantities for the first stage, and quantities and prices of products exchanged in the second stage. This paper proposes to build sellers’ coalitions and solve the two-stage decision problem as a cooperative game. Stability of a sellers’ coalition can be achieved only if the benefits resulting from collaboration are maximised and distributed according to an allocation policy that is both efficient and rational. The profit maximisation problem is formulated as a stochastic optimisation problem with recourse. Using the scenario method, this problem is approximated by a deterministic linear problem for which the existence of a solution is guaranteed. The proposed pricing policy guarantees the rational allocation of benefits under the scenario approximation. An industrial example supports the modelling approach and is used to evaluate the profitability of the exchange practice in the case of real data.

Suggested Citation

  • Lamia Triqui Sari & Jean-Claude Hennet, 2016. "Cooperative inventory planning in a distribution network," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5916-5931, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:19:p:5916-5931
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1189103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1189103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1189103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nils Rudi & Sandeep Kapur & David F. Pyke, 2001. "A Two-Location Inventory Model with Transshipment and Local Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(12), pages 1668-1680, December.
    2. Suijs, Jeroen & Borm, Peter & De Waegenaere, Anja & Tijs, Stef, 1999. "Cooperative games with stochastic payoffs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 193-205, February.
    3. Ravi Anupindi & Yehuda Bassok & Eitan Zemel, 2001. "A General Framework for the Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 349-368, February.
    4. R. T. Rockafellar & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1991. "Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 119-147, February.
    5. Paterson, Colin & Kiesmüller, Gudrun & Teunter, Ruud & Glazebrook, Kevin, 2011. "Inventory models with lateral transshipments: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 125-136, April.
    6. Arda, Yasemin & Hennet, Jean-Claude, 2006. "Inventory control in a multi-supplier system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 249-259, December.
    7. Ulac{s} Özen & Jan Fransoo & Henk Norde & Marco Slikker, 2008. "Cooperation Between Multiple Newsvendors with Warehouses," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 311-324, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luo, Chunlin & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Core, shapley value, nucleolus and nash bargaining solution: A Survey of recent developments and applications in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spiliotopoulou, Eirini & Donohue, Karen & Gürbüz, Mustafa Çagri & Heese, H. Sebastian, 2018. "Managing and reallocating inventory across two markets with local information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 531-542.
    2. Behzad Hezarkhani & Wiesław Kubiak, 2013. "Transshipment games with identical newsvendors and cooperation costs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 78(3), pages 315-339, December.
    3. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2014. "Stability and Endogenous Formation of Inventory Transshipment Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1316-1334, December.
    4. Coskun, Abdullah & Elmaghraby, Wedad & Karaman, M. Muge & Salman, F. Sibel, 2019. "Relief aid stocking decisions under bilateral agency cooperation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 147-165.
    5. Li, Ying & Liao, Yi & Hu, Xinxin & Shen, Wenjing, 2020. "Lateral transshipment with partial request and random switching," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Silbermayr, Lena, 2020. "A review of non-cooperative newsvendor games with horizontal inventory interactions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Park, Seung Jae, 2018. "Swapping inventory between competing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 26-46.
    8. Shan Li & Kay‐Yut Chen, 2020. "The Commitment Conundrum of Inventory Sharing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(2), pages 353-370, February.
    9. Eda Kemahl{i}ou{g}lu-Ziya & John J. Bartholdi, III, 2011. "Centralizing Inventory in Supply Chains by Using Shapley Value to Allocate the Profits," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 146-162, September.
    10. Hung, Yick-Hin & Li, Leon Y.O. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2011. "Trading reserved capacity independently among supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 105-112, September.
    11. Feng, Xuehao & Moon, Ilkyeong & Ryu, Kwangyeol, 2017. "Warehouse capacity sharing via transshipment for an integrated two-echelon supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 17-35.
    12. Dong, Yan & Xu, Kefeng & Evers, Philip T., 2012. "Transshipment incentive contracts in a multi-level supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 430-440.
    13. Jan A. Van Mieghem & Nils Rudi, 2002. "Newsvendor Networks: Inventory Management and Capacity Investment with Discretionary Activities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 313-335, August.
    14. Lingxiu Dong & Nils Rudi, 2004. "Who Benefits from Transshipment? Exogenous vs. Endogenous Wholesale Prices," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 645-657, May.
    15. Yan, Xinghao & Zhao, Hui, 2015. "Inventory sharing and coordination among n independent retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 576-587.
    16. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kojiro Furumi, 2023. "A two-stage linear production planning model with partial cooperation under stochastic demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 293-324, January.
    17. Ozen, U. & Slikker, M. & Norde, H.W., 2007. "A General Framework for Cooperation under Uncertainty," Discussion Paper 2007-57, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Ping Zhang & Hong Yan & King Wah Pang, 2019. "Inventory Sharing Strategy for Disposable Medical Items between Two Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Özdemir, Deniz & Yücesan, Enver & Herer, Yale T., 2013. "Multi-location transshipment problem with capacitated production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 425-435.
    20. Lee, Chungseung & Park, Kun Soo, 2016. "Inventory and transshipment decisions in the rationing game under capacity uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 82-97.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:19:p:5916-5931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.