Portfolio Allocation, Liquidity-Preference and the q Ratio: A Reassessment of the Contributions of Tobin and Kahn
AbstractThis paper compares the implications of Tobin's q theory and Kahn's Post-Keynesian monetary analysis for monetary policy formulation. In recent years, monetary policy formation has taken account of expected market evaluations of equity as well as the effect of long-term government bonds. These evaluations are suggestive of Tobin's q theory as well as Kahn's monetary theory. In contrast to the disparity of views between Keynes and Hicks in 1937, the analysis conducted by Kahn and Tobin in the 1950s and 1960s was set in a multi-asset portfolio context that exhibited a broader disagreement with regard to the influence of liquidity preference. Thus, although q is an important variable in Tobin's analysis, Kahn's introduction of the influence of liquidity premia of various assets in asset demand and the effect of portfolio flows in response to changes in relative liquidity preference across assets undermines the usefulness of this ratio. The implications of Kahn's monetary theory are developed in an analysis that presents them in terms of a comparable ratio to q. We find that there are circumstances in which the adjustment of monetary yields across assets and the underlying expectations reveal important information for the formation of monetary policy. In addition, the term structure of interest rates can convey substantial information when it deviates from historical averages and it should be considered separately from the q ratio. Moreover, if the assumptions associated with a monetary theory of interest and production are retained, the q ratio does not need to converge to unity in the long run.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Review of Political Economy.
Volume (Year): 24 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.