IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v43y2016i7p777-797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of local government on port investment: implications of China’s decentralized port governance system

Author

Listed:
  • Shanhua Wu
  • Kevin X. Li
  • Wenming Shi
  • Zhongzhen Yang

Abstract

The pursuit of better performance by the local government can influence the investment decision-making related to port expansion. This paper compares the ceilings at which the port enterprise and the local government would stop making investments. To achieve this, the benefits to the port enterprise and the local government are measured over a given time period. An empirical study investigating how a port would respond if a rival port uses a type of capacity investment strategy is conducted for two major ports in Liaoning. The time at which the local government and the port enterprise would stop making investments and the final equilibrium are developed using the data from 2010. From the empirical results, it was found that investment in port capacity contributes greatly to the local government’s performance. Meanwhile, different investment ceilings are discovered for the port enterprise and the local government. This research is meaningful for discussing the institutional relationship between the local government and the port enterprise in China’s current decentralized port governance system.This paper is a revised and expanded version of a paper entitled ‘Port expansion mechanism in the context of political achievement of local government: a special phenomenon in China’ presented at International Association of Maritime Economists 2012 Taipei Conference during 5th September –8th September.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanhua Wu & Kevin X. Li & Wenming Shi & Zhongzhen Yang, 2016. "Influence of local government on port investment: implications of China’s decentralized port governance system," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 777-797, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:7:p:777-797
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1163431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2016.1163431
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2016.1163431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Dongxu & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2018. "Systematic optimization of port clusters along the Maritime Silk Road in the context of industry transfer and production capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 174-189.
    2. Guo, Liquan & Yang, Dong & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2018. "Port integration method in multi-port regions (MPRs) based on the maximal social welfare of the external transport system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 243-257.
    3. Wang, Zhan-ao & Zheng, Chengsi, 2022. "Is technological innovation the cure for overcapacity? Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 348-361.
    4. Guo, Liquan & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin & Long, Jiancheng, 2021. "Stepwise capacity integration in port cluster under uncertainty and congestion," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 94-113.
    5. Zhang, Yanfang & Zhang, Ming & Liu, Yue & Nie, Rui, 2017. "Enterprise investment, local government intervention and coal overcapacity: The case of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 162-169.
    6. Cheng, Jiannan & Lian, Feng & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2022. "The impacts of port governance reform on port competition in China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    7. Hidalgo-Gallego, Soraya & Núñez-Sánchez, Ramón & Coto-Millán, Pablo, 2021. "Strategic interdependence in capacity expansion: A spatial analysis for port infrastructure services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 14-29.
    8. Liquan Guo & Zhongzhen Yang, 2018. "Evaluation of foreign trade transport accessibility for Mainland China," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 34-52, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:7:p:777-797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.