IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v1y2011i2p215-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Dietz

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Dietz, 2011. "Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 215-222, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:215-222
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2011.603514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2011.603514
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2011.603514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alec Wells & Aminu Bello Usman, 2023. "Trust and Voice Biometrics Authentication for Internet of Things," International Journal of Information Security and Privacy (IJISP), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Martin Mathews & Peter Stokes, 2013. "The creation of trust: the interplay of rationality, institutions and exchange," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9-10), pages 845-866, December.
    3. Nikolova, Natalia & Möllering, Guido & Reihlen, Markus, 2015. "Trusting as a ‘Leap of Faith’: Trust-building practices in client–consultant relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 232-245.
    4. Abdul Basit & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2020. "Authentic Leadership and Openness to Change in Pakistani Service Industry: The Mediating Role of Trust and Transparent Communication," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 291341-2913, December.
    5. Robert Hurley, 2023. "An Organizational Capacity for Trustworthiness: A Dynamic Routines Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 589-601, December.
    6. Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen & Feie Herkes & Ian Leistikow & Jos Verkroost & Femke de Vries & Wilte G. Zijlstra, 2021. "Can decision transparency increase citizen trust in regulatory agencies? Evidence from a representative survey experiment," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 17-31, January.
    7. Peter Ping Li, 2017. "The time for transition: Future trust research," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Rosanas, Josep María & Cugueró-Escofet, Natalia, 2013. "The Foundations of the Concept of Trust under Bounded Rationality: Competence, Value Systems, Unselfishness and the Development of Virtue," IESE Research Papers D/1069, IESE Business School.
    9. Pascal Paillé & Jorge H. Mejía Morelos & Nicolas Raineri & Florence Stinglhamber, 2019. "The Influence of the Immediate Manager on the Avoidance of Non-green Behaviors in the Workplace: A Three-Wave Moderated-Mediation Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 723-740, March.
    10. Nicole Gillespie, 2017. "Trust dynamics and repair: An interview with Roy Lewicki," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 204-219, July.
    11. Zolfaghari, Badri & Madjdi, Farsan, 2022. "Building Trusting Multicultural Organizations: Rethinking the Influence of Culture on Interpersonal Trust Development in the Workplace," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    12. Robert Gillanders & Roisin Lyons & Lisa van der Werff, 2021. "Social sexual behaviour and co-worker trust in start-up enterprises," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 765-780, August.
    13. Alison Legood & Lisa van der Werff & Allan Lee & Deanne den Hartog & Daan van Knippenberg, 2023. "A Critical Review of the Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Empirical Literature on Cognition‐Based and Affect‐Based Trust," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 495-537, March.
    14. Michael K. McCall & Margaret M. Skutsch & Jordi Honey-Roses, 2021. "Surveillance in the COVID-19 Normal: Tracking, Tracing, and Snooping – Trade-Offs in Safety and Autonomy in the E-City," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(2), pages 27-44, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.