IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v39y2012i7p1437-1454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The likelihood approach for the comparison of medical diagnostic system with multiple binary tests

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Y. Lin
  • Lance A. Waller
  • Robert H. Lyles

Abstract

Detection (diagnosis) techniques play an important role in clinical medicine. Early detection of diseases could be life-saving, and the consequences of false-positives and false-negatives could be costly. Using multiple measurements strategy is a popular tool to increase diagnostic accuracy. In addition to the new diagnostic technology, recent advances in genomics, proteomics, and other areas have allowed some of these newly developed individual biomarkers measured by non-invasive and inexpensive procedures (e.g. samples from serum, urine or stool) to progress from basic discovery research to assay development. As more tests become commercially available, there is an increasing interest for clinicians to request combinations of various non-invasive and inexpensive tests to increase diagnostic accuracy. Using information regarding individual test sensitivities and specificities, we proposed a likelihood approach to combine individual test results and to approximate or estimate the combined sensitivities and specificities of various tests taking into account the conditional correlations to quantify system performance. To illustrate this approach, we considered an example using various combinations of diagnostic tests to detect bladder cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Y. Lin & Lance A. Waller & Robert H. Lyles, 2012. "The likelihood approach for the comparison of medical diagnostic system with multiple binary tests," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1437-1454, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:7:p:1437-1454
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2011.650688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2011.650688
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2011.650688?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marios P. Georgiadis & Wesley O. Johnson & Ian A. Gardner & Ramanpreet Singh, 2003. "Correlation‐adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(1), pages 63-76, January.
    2. Shuangge Ma & Jian Huang, 2007. "Combining Multiple Markers for Classification Using ROC," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 751-757, September.
    3. Stuart G. Baker, 2000. "Identifying Combinations of Cancer Markers for Further Study as Triggers of Early Intervention," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1082-1087, December.
    4. Martin W. McIntosh & Margaret Sullivan Pepe, 2002. "Combining Several Screening Tests: Optimality of the Risk Score," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 657-664, September.
    5. Zheng Yuan & Debashis Ghosh, 2008. "Combining Multiple Biomarker Models in Logistic Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 431-439, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Binbing Yu, 2009. "Approximating the risk score for disease diagnosis using MARS," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 769-778.
    2. Yanqing Wang & Ying‐Qi Zhao & Yingye Zheng, 2020. "Learning‐based biomarker‐assisted rules for optimized clinical benefit under a risk constraint," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 853-862, September.
    3. Margaret Sullivan Pepe & Tianxi Cai & Gary Longton, 2006. "Combining Predictors for Classification Using the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 221-229, March.
    4. Debashis Ghosh, 2004. "Semiparametric methods for the binormal model with multiple biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1046, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    5. Chen, Xiwei & Vexler, Albert & Markatou, Marianthi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood ratio confidence interval estimation of best linear combinations of biomarkers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 186-198.
    6. Osamu Komori, 2011. "A boosting method for maximization of the area under the ROC curve," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(5), pages 961-979, October.
    7. Debashis Ghosh & Moulinath Banerjee & Pinaki Biswas, 2004. "Binary isotonic regression procedures, with application to cancer biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1037, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    8. Drehmann, Mathias & Juselius, Mikael, 2014. "Evaluating early warning indicators of banking crises: Satisfying policy requirements," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 759-780.
    9. Yingye Zheng & Tianxi Cai & Ziding Feng, 2006. "Application of the Time-Dependent ROC Curves for Prognostic Accuracy with Multiple Biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 279-287, March.
    10. Debashis Ghosh & Arul Chinnaiyan, 2004. "Classification and selection of biomarkers in genomic data using LASSO," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1041, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    11. Yanqing Wang & Yingqi Zhao & Yingye Zheng, 2022. "Targeted Search for Individualized Clinical Decision Rules to Optimize Clinical Outcomes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 564-581, December.
    12. Qing Lu & Nancy Obuchowski & Sungho Won & Xiaofeng Zhu & Robert C. Elston, 2010. "Using the Optimal Robust Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for Predictive Genetic Tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 586-593, June.
    13. Mei-Cheng Wang & Shanshan Li, 2012. "Bivariate Marker Measurements and ROC Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1207-1218, December.
    14. Weining Shen & Jing Ning & Ying Yuan & Anna S. Lok & Ziding Feng, 2018. "Model†free scoring system for risk prediction with application to hepatocellular carcinoma study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 239-248, March.
    15. Yuxin Zhu & Mei‐Cheng Wang, 2022. "Obtaining optimal cutoff values for tree classifiers using multiple biomarkers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 128-140, March.
    16. Chiang, Chin-Tsang & Chiu, Chih-Heng, 2012. "Nonparametric and semiparametric optimal transformations of markers," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 124-141, January.
    17. Yue Wang & Jeremy Taylor, 2004. "Monotone Constrained Tensor-product B-spline with application to screening studies," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1022, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    18. Heikki Kauppi, 2016. "The Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve," Discussion Papers 114, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    19. Zhang Zhiwei & Ma Shujie & Nie Lei & Soon Guoxing, 2017. "A Quantitative Concordance Measure for Comparing and Combining Treatment Selection Markers," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Debashis Ghosh, 2004. "Semiparametic models and estimation procedures for binormal ROC curves with multiple biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1038, Berkeley Electronic Press.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:7:p:1437-1454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.