IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v17y2017i2p343-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research: response to Delfabbro and King (2017)

Author

Listed:
  • S. Cowlishaw

Abstract

This paper provides a response to the commentary by Delfabbro and King (2017), which describes major criticisms of articles situated in a ‘political economy’ conceptual framework. The current paper argues that these criticisms obfuscate legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research, and disregard important evidence about activities of hazardous-consumption industries which provide grounds for strong concern about commercial practices of the gambling industry. Although many aspects of the commentary by Delfabbro and King (2017) are contentious, the current paper summarizes conceptual and empirical literature which supports concern about (a) agency and collaboration in practices of the gambling industry, which make assertions of equivalence with a conspiracy theory both inappropriate and misleading, and (b) the role of research on problem gambling behaviours and pathologies in supporting agendas that may undermine public health. This indicates the need for the scientific community to take seriously its role in improving awareness of the hazards of commercial involvement in gambling research, and thus helping researchers to make informed decisions about these risks and their own manner of engagement with the gambling industry.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Cowlishaw, 2017. "Legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research: response to Delfabbro and King (2017)," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 343-348, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:343-348
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2017.1321682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2017.1321682
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2017.1321682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jim Orford & Heather Wardle & Mark Griffiths, 2013. "What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 4-18, April.
    2. Hawkins, B. & McCambridge, J., 2014. "Industry actors, think tanks, and alcohol policy in the United Kingdom," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(8), pages 1363-1369.
    3. Muggli, M.E. & Forster, J.L. & Hurt, R.D. & Repace, J.L., 2001. "The smoke you don't see: Uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(9), pages 1419-1423.
    4. Jernigan, D.H., 2012. "Global alcohol producers, science, and policy: The case of the international center for alcohol policies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(1), pages 80-89.
    5. Paul Delfabbro & Daniel King, 2017. "Gambling is not a capitalist conspiracy: a critical commentary of literature on the ‘industry state gambling complex’," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 317-331, May.
    6. Rebecca Cassidy, 2014. "Fair game? Producing and publishing gambling research," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 345-353, December.
    7. Jim McCambridge & Ben Hawkins & Chris Holden, 2013. "Industry Use of Evidence to Influence Alcohol Policy: A Case Study of Submissions to the 2008 Scottish Government Consultation," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-6, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thornton, Mary & Hawkins, Benjamin, 2017. "Between a rock and a hard place: Economic expansion and social responsibility in UK media discourses on the global alcohol industry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 169-176.
    2. Eastmure, Elizabeth & Cummins, Steven & Sparks, Leigh, 2020. "Non-market strategy as a framework for exploring commercial involvement in health policy: A primer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Linda Hancock & Natalie Ralph & Florentine Petronella Martino, 2018. "Applying Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis to Australian gambling industry submissions against regulation of television sports betting advertising," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Hiilamo, Heikki & Kahl, Ulrika & Lambe, Mats, 2009. "The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program: Strategies, implementation and outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 84-96, January.
    5. David Forrest, 2013. "An Economic And Social Review Of Gambling In Great Britain," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33.
    6. Scott L. Tomar & Brion J. Fox & Herbert H. Severson, 2008. "Is Smokeless Tobacco Use an Appropriate Public Health Strategy for Reducing Societal Harm from Cigarette Smoking?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Joshua Miller & Maya Vijayaraghavan, 2022. "Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, March.
    8. Scott, C. & Hawkins, B. & Knai, C., 2017. "Food and beverage product reformulation as a corporate political strategy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 37-45.
    9. Enai Ojeda & Christian Torres & Ángela Carriedo & Mélissa Mialon & Niyati Parekh & Emanuel Orozco, 2020. "The influence of the sugar-sweetened beverage industry on public policies in Mexico," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(7), pages 1037-1044, September.
    10. Morgane Guillou-Landréat & Celine Beauvais & Marie Grall-Bronnec & Delphine Le Goff & Jean Yves Le Reste & Delphine Lever & Antoine Dany & Karine Gallopel-Morvan, 2020. "Alcohol use disorders, beverage preferences and the influence of alcohol marketing: a preliminary study," Post-Print hal-03100586, HAL.
    11. Hawkins, Benjamin & Durrance-Bagale, Anna & Walls, Helen, 2021. "Co-regulation and alcohol industry political strategy: A case study of the Public Health England-Drinkaware Drink Free Days Campaign," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Julia Stafford & Tanya Chikritzhs & Hannah Pierce & Simone Pettigrew, 2021. "An evaluation of the evidence submitted to Australian alcohol advertising policy consultations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Jonathan Parke & Adrian Park & Andrew Harris & Jane Rigbye & Alex Blaszczynski, 2014. "Restricting Access: Self-Exclusion As A Gambling Harm Minimisation Measure In Great Britain," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 8(3), pages 52-94.
    14. Nason Maani Hessari & May CI van Schalkwyk & Sian Thomas & Mark Petticrew, 2019. "Alcohol Industry CSR Organisations: What Can Their Twitter Activity Tell Us about Their Independence and Their Priorities? A Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Adam Dinsmore & Liz Allen & Kevin Dolby, 2014. "Alternative Perspectives on Impact: The Potential of ALMs and Altmetrics to Inform Funders about Research Impact," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-4, November.
    16. Simon Spedding, 2016. "Open Access Publishing of Health Research: Does Open Access Publishing Facilitate the Translation of Research into Health Policy and Practice?," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, January.
    17. Sara Capacci & Emanuela Randon & Antonello Eugenio Scorcu, 2017. "Are Consumers More Willing to Invest in Luck During Recessions?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 3(1), pages 25-38, March.
    18. Brett Abarbanel & Lisa Cain & Kahlil Philander, 2018. "Influence of perceptual factors of a responsible gambling program on customer satisfaction with a gambling firm," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 144-155.
    19. Lesch, Matthew & McCambridge, Jim, 2021. "Waiting for the wave: Political leadership, policy windows, and alcohol policy change in Ireland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    20. Gerhard Meyer & Marc von Meduna & Tim Brosowski & Tobias Hayer, 2015. "Compliance check of gambler and youth protection in German amusement arcades: a pilot study," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 343-360, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:343-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.