IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v13y2013i1p4-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Jim Orford
  • Heather Wardle
  • Mark Griffiths

Abstract

The paper reports secondary analysis of data from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey, a household survey of a representative sample of the population aged 16 years and over (N = 7756). Responses to questions about frequency of gambling and average monthly spend on each of 15 forms of gambling, and responses to two different problem gambling screens (DSM-IV and PGSI), were used to derive estimates, for each form of gambling separately, of the percentage of (1) all days play (two estimates), and (2) all spend (four estimates), attributable to problem gamblers. Although these estimates must be treated as approximations only, they demonstrate that problem gamblers make a far greater contribution to total gambling attendances and losses than problem gambling prevalence figures would suggest. There are certain forms of British gambling to which problem gamblers may be contributing as much as 20--30% of all days play and spend, and moderate risk gamblers a possible further 10--20%.

Suggested Citation

  • Jim Orford & Heather Wardle & Mark Griffiths, 2013. "What proportion of gambling is problem gambling? Estimates from the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence Survey," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 4-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:13:y:2013:i:1:p:4-18
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2012.689001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2012.689001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2012.689001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerhard Meyer & Marc von Meduna & Tim Brosowski & Tobias Hayer, 2015. "Compliance check of gambler and youth protection in German amusement arcades: a pilot study," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 343-360, December.
    2. Jonathan Parke & Adrian Park & Andrew Harris & Jane Rigbye & Alex Blaszczynski, 2014. "Restricting Access: Self-Exclusion As A Gambling Harm Minimisation Measure In Great Britain," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 8(3), pages 52-94.
    3. David Forrest, 2013. "An Economic And Social Review Of Gambling In Great Britain," Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, University of Buckingham Press, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33.
    4. Sara Capacci & Emanuela Randon & Antonello Eugenio Scorcu, 2017. "Are Consumers More Willing to Invest in Luck During Recessions?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 3(1), pages 25-38, March.
    5. Brett Abarbanel & Lisa Cain & Kahlil Philander, 2018. "Influence of perceptual factors of a responsible gambling program on customer satisfaction with a gambling firm," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 144-155.
    6. Rob Pryce & Ian Walker & Rhys Wheeler, 2017. "How much of a problem is problem gambling?," Working Papers 167235280, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    7. S. Cowlishaw, 2017. "Legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research: response to Delfabbro and King (2017)," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 343-348, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:13:y:2013:i:1:p:4-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.