IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v89y2009i1p84-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program: Strategies, implementation and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Hiilamo, Heikki
  • Kahl, Ulrika
  • Lambe, Mats

Abstract

Objectives To describe media strategies for the Nordic countries outlined in internal Philip Morris documents and to evaluate their implementation and outcomes.Methods Systematic search of internal tobacco industry documents from the databases available on the Internet and retrieval of newspaper and magazine articles from Sweden and Finland.Results The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program contained a broad range of strategies to communicate company views and to counteract negative publicity, including trips for journalists, media briefings and special events. While several of these strategies were implemented, the efforts were largely unsuccessful in that the media in Sweden and Finland carried few tobacco industry friendly articles. Articles defending the tobacco industry appeared mainly in business papers. However, support of smokers' rights' groups and sponsoring of cultural events generated positive publicity for Philip Morris.Conclusions Despite minor transient victories The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program was largely unsuccessful in providing the anticipated media coverage to question the health hazards of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and in preventing ETS regulation in the Nordic countries. The study further supports the notion that the internal corporate documents may expose the intents of the industry, but do not include enough information to evaluate implementation of industry's strategies or their outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiilamo, Heikki & Kahl, Ulrika & Lambe, Mats, 2009. "The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program: Strategies, implementation and outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 84-96, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:1:p:84-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00123-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ibrahim, J K & Glantz, Stanton A, 2006. "Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt71n452b5, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. Ibrahim, J K & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2006. "Tobacco industry litigation strategies to oppose tobacco control media campaigns," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3hm1f0mn, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. Neilsen, K & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2004. "A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3mx4p81b, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    4. Bryan-Jones, K. & Bero, L.A., 2003. "Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(4), pages 585-592.
    5. Muggli, M.E. & Forster, J.L. & Hurt, R.D. & Repace, J.L., 2001. "The smoke you don't see: Uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(9), pages 1419-1423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott L. Tomar & Brion J. Fox & Herbert H. Severson, 2008. "Is Smokeless Tobacco Use an Appropriate Public Health Strategy for Reducing Societal Harm from Cigarette Smoking?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Mehrdad Arjomandi & Thaddeus Haight & Nasrat Sadeghi & Rita Redberg & Warren M Gold, 2012. "Reduced Exercise Tolerance and Pulmonary Capillary Recruitment with Remote Secondhand Smoke Exposure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Rebbecca Lilley & Anne-Marie Feyer & Hilda Firth & Chris Cunningham & Charlotte Paul, 2010. "Surveillance of working conditions and the work environment: development of a national hazard surveillance tool in New Zealand," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(1), pages 49-57, February.
    4. Joshua Miller & Maya Vijayaraghavan, 2022. "Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, March.
    5. S. Cowlishaw, 2017. "Legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research: response to Delfabbro and King (2017)," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 343-348, May.
    6. Christopher Man-Kit Leung & Alexander K. C. Leung & Kam-Lun Ellis Hon & Albert Yim-Fai Kong, 2009. "Fighting Tobacco Smoking - a Difficult but Not Impossible Battle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Klausner, Kim & Landman, Anne & Taketa, Rachel, 2014. "“Create a Bigger Monster:” Tobacco industry actions to neutralize three landmark Surgeon Generals’ Reports," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt71b8s1c9, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    8. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, 2005. "The Tobacco Health Toll," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt0kk3c5c6, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:89:y:2009:i:1:p:84-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.