IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt71b8s1c9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

“Create a Bigger Monster:” Tobacco industry actions to neutralize three landmark Surgeon Generals’ Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Klausner, Kim
  • Landman, Anne
  • Taketa, Rachel

Abstract

This paper was written for The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Using documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu) it examines the tobacco industry’s response to three key Surgeon Generals’ reports that presented significant threats to its public image, sales and efficacy in litigation. The research shows a determined industry effort to undermine the scientific evidence making up the reports, the conclusions of the reports, and the implications of the conclusions. The primary strategy was to refute, trivialize, and discredit the scientific evidence used in the reports and the processes used to reach conclusions. The documents reviewed reveal additional tactics: an effort to claim that the Surgeon Generals’ reports are politically motivated, running paid ads that encourage people to doubt the Surgeon General’s conclusions, sending spokespersons around the country making statements in the media that conflict with the Surgeon General’s conclusions, and secretly funding independent groups whose sole purpose was to incite opposition to the Surgeon General’s conclusions. The documents show that such tactics have been centrally organized and orchestrated, and well-funded.

Suggested Citation

  • Klausner, Kim & Landman, Anne & Taketa, Rachel, 2014. "“Create a Bigger Monster:” Tobacco industry actions to neutralize three landmark Surgeon Generals’ Reports," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt71b8s1c9, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt71b8s1c9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/71b8s1c9.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 1964. "Summary," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 28(1), pages 3-3, May.
    2. Landman, Anne & Cortese, Daniel K. & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 970-981, February.
    3. N/A, 1964. "Summary," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 29(1), pages 3-3, August.
    4. N/A, 1964. "Summary," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 27(1), pages 3-3, February.
    5. Muggli, M.E. & Forster, J.L. & Hurt, R.D. & Repace, J.L., 2001. "The smoke you don't see: Uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(9), pages 1419-1423.
    6. N/A, 1964. "Summary," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 30(1), pages 3-3, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spurlock, Hughes H., 1966. "The Competitive Position of U.S. Farm Products in the Japanese Market," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 144450, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Regier, Donald W. & Goolsby, O. Halbert, 1970. "Growth in World Demand for Feed Grains: Related to Meat and Livestock Products and Human Consumption of Grain, 1980," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 145298, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Robert W. Dimand & Rebeca Gomez Betancourt, 2012. "Retrospectives: Irving Fisher's Appreciation and Interest (1896) and the Fisher Relation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(4), pages 185-196, Fall.
    4. Hiilamo, Heikki & Kahl, Ulrika & Lambe, Mats, 2009. "The Philip Morris Nordic journalist program: Strategies, implementation and outcomes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 84-96, January.
    5. Mamudu, Hadii M. & Hammond, Ross & Glantz, Stanton, 2008. "Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1690-1699, December.
    6. Scott L. Tomar & Brion J. Fox & Herbert H. Severson, 2008. "Is Smokeless Tobacco Use an Appropriate Public Health Strategy for Reducing Societal Harm from Cigarette Smoking?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Joshua Miller & Maya Vijayaraghavan, 2022. "Tobacco Industry Efforts to Respond to Smoke-Free Policies in Multi-Unit Housing: An Evaluation of Tobacco Industry Documents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, March.
    8. S. Cowlishaw, 2017. "Legitimate concerns about industry involvement in gambling research: response to Delfabbro and King (2017)," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 343-348, May.
    9. Rochel de Camargo, Kenneth, 2012. "How to identify science being bent: The tobacco industry's fight to deny second-hand smoking health hazards as an example," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1230-1235.
    10. Christopher Man-Kit Leung & Alexander K. C. Leung & Kam-Lun Ellis Hon & Albert Yim-Fai Kong, 2009. "Fighting Tobacco Smoking - a Difficult but Not Impossible Battle," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, 2005. "The Tobacco Health Toll," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt0kk3c5c6, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business; Medicine and Health Sciences; Surgeon General; tobacco industry; junk science; smoking/history*; smoking/prevention & control;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt71b8s1c9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.