IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i2p332-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polycentricity – one concept or many?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Rauhut

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss polycentrism and its implications. Polycentricity plays a key role in EU Cohesion Policy and has done so since 1999 when the notion was included in the European Spatial Development Perspective. Politically, it emerged as a key tool because of its ability to fuse together the two primary and conflicting perceptions of spatial–economic development, cohesion and competitiveness. No agreed definition of polycentricity exists. Furthermore, different actors and disciplines define polycentrism differently. The absence of a concise and coherent definition makes it difficult to measure polycentricity. Moreover, several studies have concluded that it is difficult to identify empirical evidence to support the positive claims made in its name. Polycentrism is assumed toolbox to reduce regional disparities, but polycentric countries display higher regional disparities than monocentric countries. Polycentric countries do not perform better than monocentric countries with regard to competitiveness and GDP/cap. As such, this paper concludes that not only does the political meaning of polycentricity struggle over aims with the inherit dichotomy at its heart, it also struggles in terms of basic credibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Rauhut, 2017. "Polycentricity – one concept or many?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 332-348, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:332-348
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1276157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2016.1276157
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2016.1276157?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Faludi, 2007. "Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society1," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 567-583, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Burgalassi & Chiara Agnoletti & Leonardo Piccini, 2019. "Polycentricity and regional development: an analytical framework and some evidence from Italy," Discussion Papers 2019/249, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    2. Lanfredi, Maria & Egidi, Gianluca & Bianchini, Leonardo & Salvati, Luca, 2022. "One size does not fit all: A tale of polycentric development and land degradation in Italy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Liang Zhang & Linlin Zhang & Xue Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Spatial Growth Performance from the Perspective of a Polycentric City: A Case Study of Hangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Mi Ye & Ben Derudder & Lei Jiang & Freke Caset & Yingcheng Li, 2023. "The Effects of Urban Polycentricity on Particulate Matter Emissions From Vehicles: Evidence From 102 Chinese Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 135-147.
    5. Weikai Wang & Ya Ping Wang & Keith Kintrea, 2020. "The (Re)Making of Polycentricity in China's Planning Discourse: The Case of Tianjin," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 857-875, September.
    6. Zi Ye & Chen Zou & Yongchun Huang, 2022. "Impact of Heterogeneous Spatial Structure on Regional Innovation—From the Perspectives of Efficiency and Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Seny Kan, Konan A. & Agbodjo, Serge & Gandja, Serge V., 2021. "Accounting polycentricity in Africa: Framing an ‘accounting and development’ research agenda," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rom:campco:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:392-398 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. David Evers & Joost Tennekes, 2016. "Europe exposed: mapping the impacts of EU policies on spatial planning in the Netherlands," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1747-1765, October.
    3. David Evers, 2008. "Reflections On Territorial Cohesion And European Spatial Planning," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 303-315, July.
    4. Constance Carr & Tom Becker & Estelle Evrard & Birte Nienaber & Ursula Roos & Evan McDonough & Markus Hesse & Rob Krueger, 2015. "Raising sustainability/Mobilising sustainability: Why European sustainable urban development initiatives are slow to materialise/Territorial cohesion as a vehicle of sustainability/Sustainable urban d," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 99-125, March.
    5. Bonifazi, Alessandro & Rega, Carlo & Torre, Carmelo Maria, 2008. "Evaluation and the environmental democracy of cities: Strategic Environmental Assessment of urban plans in Italy," MPRA Paper 11055, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.
    7. Claire Colomb & Gonçalo Santinha, 2014. "European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization through the European Spatial Planning Le," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 459-480, March.
    8. Olivier Sykes & Andreas Schulze Bäing, 2017. "Regional and territorial development policy after the 2016 EU referendum – Initial reflections and some tentative scenarios," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 240-256, May.
    9. Liviu-Cosmin MOSORA, 2011. "Local Action Groups, A Solution To The Rural Development Of Romania," Proceedings of Administration and Public Management International Conference, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 392-398, June.
    10. Golobic, Mojca & Marot, Naja, 2011. "Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 163-173, August.
    11. Mikko Weckroth & Sami Moisio, 2020. "Territorial Cohesion of What and Why? The Challenge of Spatial Justice for EU’s Cohesion Policy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 183-193.
    12. Claire Colomb, 2010. "European spatial research and planning, edited by Andreas Faludi," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 677-679.
    13. Andrei Sebastian Badea, 2011. "Perspectives On Improving Cohesion Policy Spending," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(1), pages 6-12, March.
    14. Márton Czirfusz, 2021. "The concept of solidarity in cohesion policies of the European Union and Hungary," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 919-937, August.
    15. Štěpán Nosek, 2017. "Territorial cohesion storylines in 2014–2020 Cohesion Policy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(12), pages 2157-2174, December.
    16. Berezi Elorrieta, 2011. "The Role Of Territorial Cohesion As The Basis Of European Spatial Planning," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1208, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Lisa Van Well, 2012. "Conceptualizing the Logics of Territorial Cohesion," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1549-1567, September.
    18. Alberto Vanolo, 2010. "European Spatial Planning Between Competitiveness and Territorial Cohesion: Shadows of Neo-liberalism," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1301-1315, August.
    19. Humer Alois, 2014. "Researching Social Services of General Interest: an Analytical Framework Derived from Underlying Policy Systems," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    21. Rhiannon Pugh, 2018. "Questioning the implementation of smart specialisation: Regional innovation policy and semi-autonomous regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 530-547, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:332-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.