IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v29y1997i4p529-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transportation costs and product demand: wagering on parimutuel horse racing

Author

Listed:
  • Mukhtar Ali
  • Richard Thalheimer

Abstract

Parimutuel horse-race wagering is in many respects like any other economic good but it differs in one important way from a vast majority of them. Given the present market arrangement, this good cannot be transported to the consumer; instead the consumer must travel to the production site where the good is consumed as it is produced. Thus, transportation costs must play a crucial role in the demand decision for horse-race wagering. The consumers incur not only out-of-pocket expenses for travelling but also the cost of the time required to travel to and to consume the product. Moreover, consumers incur differential costs in obtaining the same product because of their locational differences. Wagering demands are theorized to be the consequence of the choice of utility maximizing consumers which incorporates this special characteristic of the product. Models for parimutuel horse-race wagering are then estimated both for thoroughbred and for harness horse racing in the state of New Jersey. It is found that both harness and thoroughbred horse-race wagering are sensitive to travelling costs and both can be increased by reducing the costs per visit to wagering sites. These costs can be lowered by reducing the travelling distance of the consumers to the wagering sites. This can be achieved by increasing the number of racing days or by simply reallocating a given number of racing days among different locations. It can also be achieved by increasing the number of wagering sites and locating them strategically. It is interesting to see that travelling distance declines non-linearly as the number of racing days and/or the number of sites is increased and the decline is insignificant as the number of racing days and/or the number of sites is increased beyond a saturation point. The unique construction of travelling costs allows investigation of wagering impacts of an introduction of a new wagering site or an elimination of an existing one.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukhtar Ali & Richard Thalheimer, 1997. "Transportation costs and product demand: wagering on parimutuel horse racing," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 529-542.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:29:y:1997:i:4:p:529-542
    DOI: 10.1080/000368497327029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/000368497327029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/000368497327029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert S. Guthrie, 1981. "Taxing Horse Race Gambling: the Revenue Potential," Public Finance Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 79-90, January.
    2. Daniel B. Suits, 1979. "The Elasticity of Demand for Gambling," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 93(1), pages 155-162.
    3. Gruen, Arthur, 1976. "An Inquiry into the Economics of Race-Track Gambling," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(1), pages 169-177, February.
    4. Richard Thalheimer & Mukhtar M. Ali, 1995. "The Demand for Parimutuel Horse Race Wagering and Attendance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 129-143, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marshall Gramm & C. Nicholas McKinney & Douglas H. Owens & Matt E. Ryan, 2007. "What Do Bettors Want? Determinants of Pari‐Mutuel Betting Preference," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 465-491, July.
    2. Richard Thalheimer, 2008. "Government restrictions and the demand for casino and parimutuel wagering," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 773-791.
    3. Ray, Margaret, 2001. "How Much on that Doggie at the Window? An Analysis of the Decline in Greyhound Racing Handle," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 31(2), pages 165-176, Fall.
    4. Vickner, Steven S. & Koch, Stephen I., 2001. "Hedonic Pricing, Information, And The Market For Thoroughbred Yearlings," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17.
    5. Neibergs, J. Shannon & Thalheimer, Richard, 1997. "Price Expectations And Supply Response In The Thoroughbred Yearling Market," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(2), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Martin Smith, 2001. "Breeding incentive programmes and demand for California thoroughbred racing: is there a quality/quantity tradeoff?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(14), pages 1755-1762.
    7. Paresh Kumar Narayan & Russell Smyth, 2004. "The Race that Stops a Nation: The Demand for the Melbourne Cup," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 80(249), pages 193-207, June.
    8. Richard Thalheimer & Mukhtar Ali, 2003. "The demand for casino gaming," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 907-918.
    9. Alessandro Pandimiglio & Marco Spallone, 2011. "L'elasticitˆ della domanda nel mercato italiano dei giochi: inquadramento generale ed analisi dei casi del lotto e del superenalotto," Working Papers CASMEF 1108, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    10. Richard Thalheimer, 1998. "Parimutuel wagering and video gaming: a racetrack portfolio," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 531-544.
    11. Richard Thalheimer, 2012. "The demand for slot machine and pari-mutuel horse race wagering at a racetrack-casino," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1177-1191, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thalheimer, Richard & Ali, Mukhtar M., 1995. "Intertrack wagering and the demand for parimutuel horse racing," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 369-383, October.
    2. Richard Thalheimer, 2012. "The demand for slot machine and pari-mutuel horse race wagering at a racetrack-casino," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1177-1191, March.
    3. Richard Thalheimer, 2008. "Government restrictions and the demand for casino and parimutuel wagering," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 773-791.
    4. Richard Thalheimer & Mukhtar Ali, 2003. "The demand for casino gaming," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 907-918.
    5. Jim Landers, 2008. "What's the potential impact of casino tax increases on wagering handle: estimates of the price elasticity of demand for casino gaming," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 8(6), pages 1-15.
    6. Richard Thalheimer, 1998. "Parimutuel wagering and video gaming: a racetrack portfolio," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 531-544.
    7. Alessandro Pandimiglio & Marco Spallone, 2011. "L'elasticitˆ della domanda nel mercato italiano dei giochi: inquadramento generale ed analisi dei casi del lotto e del superenalotto," Working Papers CASMEF 1108, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    8. Carter, Harold O. & Shepard, Lawrence E. & Whitney, Marilyn, 1991. "An Economic Analysis of the California Thoroughbred Racing Industry," Research Reports 251935, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    9. Kathryn L. Combs & Jaebeom Kim & Jim Landers & John A. Spry, 2016. "The Responsiveness of Casino Revenue to the Casino Tax Rate," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 22-44, September.
    10. Charles Moul & Joseph Keller, 2014. "Time to Unbridle U.S. Thoroughbred Racetracks? Lessons from Australian Bookies," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(3), pages 211-239, May.
    11. Valeria De Bonis & Alessandro Gandolfo, 2013. "The Italian Model of Gambling Taxation: Fiscal Policy Guidelines for the «Sustainable Development» of an Important and Controversial Market," Economia dei Servizi, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 239-258.
    12. Craig A. Depken & John M. Gandar, 2021. "Integrity Fees in Sports Betting Markets," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 76-90, January.
    13. Badji, Samia & Black, Nicole & Johnston, David W., 2023. "Economic, Health and Behavioural Consequences of Greater Gambling Availability," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Ursula Hauser‐Rethaller & Ulrich König, 2002. "Parimutuel Lotteries: Gamblers' Behavior and the Demand for Tickets," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 3(2), pages 223-245, May.
    15. Lambert, Thomas, 2021. "US Gambling Stagnation: Will New Gambling Forms Make a Difference?," MPRA Paper 108549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Marshall Gramm & C. Nicholas McKinney & Douglas H. Owens & Matt E. Ryan, 2007. "What Do Bettors Want? Determinants of Pari‐Mutuel Betting Preference," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 465-491, July.
    17. Chang, Juin-Jen & Fiedler, Ingo & Lai, Ching-Chong & Wang, Ping, 2021. "Cross-border casino competition, Externalities and Optimal Tax Policy: A Unified Theory with Quantitative Analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Juin-Jen Chang & Ching-Chong Lai & Ping Wang, 2017. "A Tale of Two Cities: Cross-Border Casino Competition Between Detroit and Windsor," NBER Working Papers 23969, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Douglas M. Walker & John D. Jackson, 2008. "Do U.S. Gambling Industries Cannibalize Each Other?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 36(3), pages 308-333, May.
    20. Lambert, Thoomas, 2020. "Kentucky and the Thoroughbred Industries: Prospects and Challenges as Gambling Popularity Declines," MPRA Paper 105077, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:29:y:1997:i:4:p:529-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.