IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v3y2016i4p307-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation magnitude of manufacturing industry in Egypt with particular focus on SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ramadan A. Rezk

    (Academy of Scientific Research & Technology, Egypt)

  • Haiam Helmy Ibrahim

    (Academy of Scientific Research & Technology, Egypt)

  • Amr Radwan

    (Academy of Scientific Research & Technology, Egypt)

  • Mahmoud M. Sakr

    (Academy of Scientific Research & Technology, Egypt)

  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (VILNIUS TECH), Lithuania)

  • Manuela Tvaronavičienė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Lithuania)

  • Leonardo Piccinetti

    (Rete Europea Dell'Innovazione, Italy)

Abstract

. This paper is based on the main findings of the 2015 Egyptian National Innovation Survey, which covered 2700 SMEs firms with different manufacturing activities. The main objective of paper is to try to evaluate the situation in the private SMEs, regarding to the innovation. Also highlights on the roles of cooperation in innovation on performance of SMEs. Our findings show that 35.5% of Egyptian SMEs have at least one type of innovation (product or process). The innovation activities increase with increasing the size of companies in term of number of employees. The majority of SMEs are in the manufacturing sectors, whereas 2.1 % of innovative SMEs firms depend on universities, government, and public research institutions as main sources of information to developing their product or process innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ramadan A. Rezk & Haiam Helmy Ibrahim & Amr Radwan & Mahmoud M. Sakr & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Leonardo Piccinetti, 2016. "Innovation magnitude of manufacturing industry in Egypt with particular focus on SMEs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(4), pages 307-318, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:307-318
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(1)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/12/Rezk_Innovation_magnitude_of_manufacturing_industry_in_Egypt_with_particular_focus_on_SMEs.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/78
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(1)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. H. Bala Subrahmanya & M. Mathirajan & K. N. Krishnaswamy, 2010. "Importance of Technological Innovation for SME Growth: Evidence from India," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2010-003, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Lisa De Propris, 2002. "Types of innovation and inter-firm co-operation," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 337-353, October.
    3. Nola Hewitt-Dundas, 2006. "Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 257-277, April.
    4. Bala Subrahmanya, M. H. & Mathirajan, M. & Krishnaswamy, K. N., 2010. "Importance of Technological Innovation for SME Growth - Evidence from India," MERIT Working Papers 007, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. Mohamed Ramadan A. Rezk & Haiam Helmy Ibrahim & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Mahmoud M. Sakr & Leonardo Piccinetti & Leonardo Piccinetti, 2015. "Measuring innovations in Egypt: case of industry," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(1), pages 47-55, September.
    6. Peres, Wilson & Stumpo, Giovanni, 2000. "Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in Latin America and the Caribbean Under the New Economic Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 1643-1655, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunnar Prause & Gunnar Prause & Sina Atari, 2017. "On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 421-431, June.
    2. Gunnar Prause & Sina Atari, 2017. "On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0," Post-Print hal-01860909, HAL.
    3. Eugenia Panfiluk & Elżbieta Szymańska, 2017. "The measurement of the innovativeness of health tourism services using an adequacy matrix title of the article," Post-Print hal-01860905, HAL.
    4. Eugenia Panfiluk & Elżbieta Szymańska, 2017. "The measurement of the innovativeness of health tourism services using an adequacy matrix title of the article," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 400-420, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunjeong Kim & Hannah Jun, 2022. "Exploring Technology Innovation Factors, Government Support and Performance of Development-Related Social Enterprises: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Nasfi Fkili Wahiba & Mahmoudi Dina, 2023. "Technological Change, Growth and Income Inequality," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 121-131, January.
    3. Gabriele Santoro & Alberto Ferraris & Elisa Giacosa & Guido Giovando, 2018. "How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 561-574, June.
    4. Rosa Maria Fanelli, 2021. "Barriers to Adopting New Technologies within Rural Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Dr. Arif Anjum, 2018. "Impact of Technology Adoption on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in India," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 857-867:5.
    6. Šarlija, Nataša & Bilandžić, Ana, 2018. "Does Innovation Matter for SMEs' growth in Croatia?," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 356-375, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    7. Erind Hoti & Gentian Hoxhalli, 2015. "From demand-pull and technology-push innovations, towards knowledge-based innovation systems. Evidence from Albanian small and medium enterprises," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2805365, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Raza Ur Rahman & Syed Mohsin Ali Shah & Hatem El-Gohary & Muzaffar Abbas & Syed Haider Khalil & Saad Al Altheeb & Fahad Sultan, 2020. "Social Media Adoption and Financial Sustainability: Learned Lessons from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Freel, Mark, 2010. "Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 47-54, February.
    10. -, 2002. "L'équité, le développement et la citoyenneté: version condensée," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2321 edited by Cepalc.
    11. Konstantinos Panagiotakopoulos & Jose Maria Fernandez-Crehuet & José Molero Zayas, 2018. "Public Finance of R&D and the Obstacles to Innovation: The Case of Spain," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(12), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Mohd Nur Ruzainy Alwi* & Amar Hisham Jaaffar & Nur Amira Yahya & Nurnazurah Azami, 2018. "Research Framework for the Impact of Innovative Mindset, Innovative Behaviour, and Innovation Performance on Competitive Advantage: An Application for Halal Smes Owner-Manager," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 718-723:2.
    13. Vladimir Shatrevich & Valentina Strautmane, 2015. "Industrialisation factors in post-industrial society," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(2), pages 157-172, December.
    14. Roman Teplov & Ekaterina Albats & Daria Podmetina, 2019. "What Does Open Innovation Mean? Business Versus Academic Perceptions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-33, January.
    15. Wilfried Zidorn & Marcus Wagner, 2012. "Too Much of a Good Thing: The Role of Alliance Portfolio Diversity for Innovation Output in the Biotechnology Industry," DRUID Working Papers 12-10, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    16. Muñoz-Sepúlveda, Jesús A., 2017. "Restricciones de capacidad, exportación e I+D: Un análisis empírico con datos de empresas manufactureras españolas/Capacity Constraints, Exports and R&D: An Empirical Analysis with Data of Spanish Man," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 35, pages 133-152, Enero.
    17. Andrew Copus & Dimitris Skuras & Kyriaki Tsegenidi, 2006. "Innovation and Peripherality: A Comparative Study in Six EU Member Countries," ERSA conference papers ersa06p295, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Ramadani, Veland & Hisrich, Robert D. & Abazi-Alili, Hyrije & Dana, Léo-Paul & Panthi, Laxman & Abazi-Bexheti, Lejla, 2019. "Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 271-280.
    19. Huasheng Zhu & Junwei Feng & Maojun Wang & Fan Xu, 2017. "Sustaining Regional Advantages in Manufacturing: Skill Accumulation of Rural–Urban Migrant Workers in the Coastal Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    20. Wu, Qiang & Dbouk, Wassim & Hasan, Iftekhar & Kobeissi, Nada & Zheng, Li, 2021. "Does gender affect innovation? Evidence from female chief technology officers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:307-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.