IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v8y2018i5f8_5_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio rebalancing versus buy-and-hold: A simulation based study with special consideration of portfolio concentration

Author

Listed:
  • Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek

Abstract

The aim of this study is not only to explore if portfolio rebalancing can lead to a better performance compared to a buy-and-hold (B&H) strategy but to find out if there is a correlation between the weight-based concentration of the B&H portfolio and the success of a rebalancing strategy. For these reasons, it is firstly discussed how rebalancing affects portfolio diversification, risk-adjusted return and the utility value for a certain investor. Secondly, it is discussed on what the portfolio weight of a special stock is depending on whereas the cases of an initially equally and unequally weighted portfolio are distinguished. The latter one has a larger weight concentration which is determined by the normalized Herfindahl index and the coefficient of variation. These issues are explored theoretically and empirically. In the empirical analysis the Monte Carlo simulation is used which is based upon 1,000 simulations with 520 generated returns for each of the 15 assumed stocks in the initially equally weighted portfolio. The results show that the diversification ratio, the return to risk ratio, and the utility value of the rebalanced portfolio turn out to be significantly greater than those of the B&H portfolio. The rebalanced portfolio has a slightly (not significant) positive rebalancing return. Finally, a strong negative correlation between the rebalancing return and the weight concentration of the B&H portfolio is found. JEL classification numbers: G11Keywords: portfolio rebalancing, rebalancing return, buy-and-hold, diversification ratio, return to risk ratio, utility value, portfolio concentration, autocorrelation

Suggested Citation

  • Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek, 2018. "Portfolio rebalancing versus buy-and-hold: A simulation based study with special consideration of portfolio concentration," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(5), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:8:y:2018:i:5:f:8_5_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%208_5_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek, 2017. "Rebalancing and Diversification Return – Evidence from the German Stock Market," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 1-1.
    2. Samuel Kyle Jones & Joe Bert Stine, 2010. "Expected utility and the non-normal returns of common portfolio rebalancing strategies," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(6), pages 406-419, February.
    3. Chen, XiaoHua & Lai, Yun-Ju, 2015. "On the concentration of mutual fund portfolio holdings: Evidence from Taiwan," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 268-286.
    4. Simone Brands & Stephen J. Brown & David R. Gallagher, 2005. "Portfolio Concentration and Investment Manager Performance," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 5(3‐4), pages 149-174, September.
    5. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2014. "Where is the value added of rebalancing? A systematic comparison of alternative rebalancing strategies," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 28(3), pages 209-231, August.
    6. Winfried G Hallerbach, 2014. "Disentangling rebalancing return," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(5), pages 301-316, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek, 2017. "Rebalancing and Diversification Return – Evidence from the German Stock Market," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 1-1.
    2. Dariusz Filip & Tomasz Miziołek, 2019. "Market Concentration in the Polish Investment Fund Industry," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 53-78.
    3. Hubert Dichtl & Wolfgang Drobetz & Martin Wambach, 2014. "Where is the value added of rebalancing? A systematic comparison of alternative rebalancing strategies," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 28(3), pages 209-231, August.
    4. Herrmann, Ulf & Rohleder, Martin & Scholz, Hendrik, 2016. "Does style-shifting activity predict performance? Evidence from equity mutual funds," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 112-130.
    5. Walter, Christian, 2016. "The financial Logos: The framing of financial decision-making by mathematical modelling," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 597-604.
    6. Hitesh Doshi & Redouane Elkamhi & Mikhail Simutin, 2015. "Managerial Activeness and Mutual Fund Performance," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 156-184.
    7. Ekholm, Anders G., 2012. "Portfolio returns and manager activity: How to decompose tracking error into security selection and market timing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 349-358.
    8. Daniel Buncic & Jon E. Eggins & Robert J. Hill & David Gallagher, 2015. "Measuring fund style, performance and activity: a new style-profiling approach," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 55(1), pages 29-55, March.
    9. Poompak Kusawat & Nopadol Rompho, 2023. "Impact of Investing Characteristics on Financial Performance of Individual Investors: An Exploratory Study," Papers 2311.00384, arXiv.org.
    10. Jiawen Xu & Yixuan Li & Kai Liu & Tao Chen, 2023. "Portfolio selection: from under-diversification to concentration," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 1539-1557, April.
    11. Pi‐Hsia Hung & Donald Lien & Yun‐Ju Chien, 2020. "Portfolio concentration and fund manager performance," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 423-451, July.
    12. Mantilla-Garcia, Daniel & Malagon, Juliana & Aldana-Galindo, Julian R., 2022. "Can the portfolio excess growth rate explain the predictive power of idiosyncratic volatility?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    13. Loban, Lidia & Sarto, José Luis & Vicente, Luis, 2021. "Determinants of non-compliant equity funds with EU portfolio concentration limits," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Cao, Ying & von Reibnitz, Anna & Warren, Geoffrey J., 2020. "Return dispersion and fund performance: Australia – The land of opportunity?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Feng Dong, 2020. "Noise-driven abnormal institutional investor attention," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 467-488, September.
    16. Martin Boďa & Mária Kanderová, 2020. "Performance of Six Sigma Rebalancing for Portfolios Mixing Polar Investment Styles," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 139-155.
    17. Giulia Dal Pra & Massimo Guidolin & Manuela Pedio & Fabiola Vasile, 2016. "Do Regimes in Excess Stock Return Predictability Create Economic Value? An Out-of-Sample Portfolio Analysis," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1637, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    18. Daniel Buncic & Jon E. Eggins & Robert J. Hill, 2010. "Mutual Fund Style, Characteristic-Matched Performance Benchmarks and Activity Measures: A New Approach," Discussion Papers 2010-12, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    19. Lang, Gunnar & Shen, Yu & Xu, Xian, 2014. "Chinese pension fund investment efficiency: Evidence from CNCSSF stock holdings," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-007, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Keith Cuthbertson & Simon Hayley & Nick Motson & Dirk Nitzsche, 2016. "What Does Rebalancing Really Achieve?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 224-240, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:8:y:2018:i:5:f:8_5_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.