IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v124y2015i3p981-991.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dark Side of Possessing Power: Power Reduces Happiness in a Collectivist Context

Author

Listed:
  • Jesus Datu
  • Jose Reyes

Abstract

Most recent conceptualizations emphasized the role of power in facilitating positive psychological outcomes (subjective well being) as it reduces sensitivity to social cues and increases authenticity among people in the Western contexts who would likely manifest an independent self-construal. Though, the self-construal theory posits that individuals in collectivist cultures would more likely endorse a view of self that prioritize sensitivity to contextual information through an interdependent self-construal. This implies that power may have a different impact on subjective well being in interdependent societies since authenticity was found to be a less important predictor of happiness in collectivist cultures. The aim of the study is to determine the predictive influence of power on SWB as mediated by authenticity. Results showed that power positively predicted authenticity. However, power negatively predicted SWB and authenticity mediated the link between power and SWB. Implications of the findings are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Jesus Datu & Jose Reyes, 2015. "The Dark Side of Possessing Power: Power Reduces Happiness in a Collectivist Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 981-991, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:124:y:2015:i:3:p:981-991
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-014-0813-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-014-0813-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-014-0813-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Dubois & Ena Inesi & Simona Botti & Derek D. Rucker & Adam D. Galinsky, 2011. "Power and Choice: Their Dynamic Interplay in Quenching the Thirst for Personal Control," Post-Print hal-00696608, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesus Alfonso D. Datu & Charlie E. Labarda & Maria Guadalupe C. Salanga, 2020. "Flourishing is Associated with Achievement Goal Orientations and Academic Delay of Gratification in a Collectivist Context," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1171-1182, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hwang, YooHee & Shin, Joongwon & Mattila, Anna S., 2018. "So private, yet so public: The impact of spatial distance, other diners, and power on solo dining experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 36-47.
    2. Annika Scholl & Florian Landkammer & Kai Sassenberg, 2019. "When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ma, Anyi & Yang, Yu & Savani, Krishna, 2019. "“Take it or leave it!” A choice mindset leads to greater persistence and better outcomes in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Brady, Garrett L. & Inesi, M. Ena & Mussweiler, Thomas, 2021. "The power of lost alternatives in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 59-80.
    5. Yu, Andrew & Hays, Nicholas A. & Zhao, Emma Y., 2019. "Development of a bipartite measure of social hierarchy: The perceived power and perceived status scales," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 84-104.
    6. Lu, Zhi & Bolton, Lisa E. & Ng, Sharon & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2020. "The Price of Power: How Firm’s Market Power Affects Perceived Fairness of Price Increases," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 220-234.
    7. Sunyee Yoon & Hyeongmin Christian Kim & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Simona BottiAssociate Editor, 2018. "Feeling Economically Stuck: The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Socioeconomic Status on Variety Seeking," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1141-1156.
    8. Wu, Linwan, 2019. "Website interactivity may compensate for consumers’ reduced control in E-Commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 253-266.
    9. Preeti Narwal & J. K. Nayak & Shivam Rai, 2022. "Assessing Customers' Moral Disengagement from Reciprocity Concerns in Participative Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 537-554, June.
    10. Joshua T Beck & Ryan Rahinel & Alexander Bleier & Simona Botti & Darren W Dahl & J Jeffrey Inman, 2020. "Company Worth Keeping: Personal Control and Preferences for Brand Leaders [Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(5), pages 871-886.
    11. Kull, Alexander J. & Heath, Timothy B., 2016. "You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 78-92.
    12. Michael J. Barone & T. J. Bae & Shanshan Qian & Jason d’Mello, 2017. "Power and the appeal of the deal: how consumers value the control provided by Pay What You Want (PWYW) pricing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 437-447, September.
    13. Wang, Wangshuai & Raghunathan, Rajagopal & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2022. "Powerlessness, variety-seeking, and the mediating role of need for autonomy," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 706-723.
    14. Taly Reich & Daniella M Kupor & Rosanna K Smith & Darren DahlEditor & JoAndrea HoeggAssociate Editor, 2018. "Made by Mistake: When Mistakes Increase Product Preference," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 1085-1103.
    15. Wang, Wangshuai & Li, Jie & Sun, Gong & Zhang, Xin-an & Cheng, Zhiming, 2016. "The Costs to Life Satisfaction of Impression Management: The Sense of Control and Loneliness as Mediators," MPRA Paper 72912, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Thompson, Debora V. & Hamilton, Rebecca W. & Banerji, Ishani, 2020. "The effect of childhood socioeconomic status on patience," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 85-102.
    17. Huang, Huiling & Liu, Stephanie Q. & Kandampully, Jay & Bujisic, Milos, 2020. "Consumer Responses to Scarcity Appeals in Online Booking," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Peluso, Alessandro M. & Bonezzi, Andrea & De Angelis, Matteo & Rucker, Derek D., 2017. "Compensatory word of mouth: Advice as a device to restore control," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 499-515.
    19. Huang, Guei-Hua & Korfiatis, Nikolaos & Chang, Chun-Tuan, 2018. "Mobile shopping cart abandonment: The roles of conflicts, ambivalence, and hesitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 165-174.
    20. Michael Niedeggen & Rudolf Kerschreiter & Katharina Schuck, 2019. "Loss of control as a violation of expectations: Testing the predictions of a common inconsistency compensation approach in an inclusionary cyberball game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:124:y:2015:i:3:p:981-991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.