IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v19y2025i6d10.1007_s11846-024-00804-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures

Author

Listed:
  • Maral Mahdad

    (Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e))

  • Saeed Roshani

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

Abstract

In this study, we conduct a panoramic analysis of two decades of open innovation (OI), leveraging topic modeling with machine learning to map out ten critical OI pathways and their associated failure mechanisms on the micro, meso, and macro levels. Open innovation has revolutionized organizational innovation, collaboration, and competition. However, it presents complexities that require a multifaceted approach to research. Our findings, informed by interpretative thematic analysis, reveal distinct scholarly debates and three primary controversies within the OI research landscape, pointing to the need for future research to integrate these diverse narratives. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of the OI field’s evolution and current state, along with an analysis of its underlying failure mechanisms, we aim to guide strategic decision-making in OI practice, and enrich the academic discourse on its operational and strategic dimensions. Finally, we highlight several potential avenues for future research that emerge from our synthesis of the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Maral Mahdad & Saeed Roshani, 2025. "The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1637-1668, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00804-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-024-00804-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-024-00804-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-024-00804-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audretsch, David B. & Belitski, Maksim, 2024. "Knowledge collaboration, firm productivity and innovation: A critical assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Peter Madzík & Lukáš Falát & Lukáš Copuš & Marco Valeri, 2023. "Digital transformation in tourism: bibliometric literature review based on machine learning approach," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 177-205, March.
    3. Ekaterina Albats & Daria Podmetina & Wim Vanhaverbeke, 2023. "Open innovation in SMEs: A process view towards business model innovation," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 2519-2560, November.
    4. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M., 2010. "How open is innovation?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 699-709, July.
    5. Juliana R. Baltazar & Cristina I. Fernandes & Veland Ramadani & Mathew Hughes, 2023. "Family business succession and innovation: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2897-2920, November.
    6. Sabine Brunswicker & Wim Vanhaverbeke, 2015. "Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 1241-1263, October.
    7. Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1899-1933, July.
    8. Mustak, Mekhail & Salminen, Joni & Plé, Loïc & Wirtz, Jochen, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 389-404.
    9. Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi & Silvia Vermicelli, 2022. "Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework and a research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1269-1310, July.
    10. Madanaguli, Arun & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Kaur, Puneet, 2023. "Diving into the uncertainties of open innovation: A systematic review of risks to uncover pertinent typologies and unexplored horizons," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Du, Jingshu & Leten, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2014. "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 828-840.
    12. Adrián Kovács & Bart Looy & Bruno Cassiman, 2015. "Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 951-983, September.
    13. Johanna Gast & Andreas Kallmünzer & Sascha Kraus & Katherine Gundolf & Judith Arnold, 2019. "Coopetition of small- and medium-sized family enterprises: insights from an IT business network," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 38(1/2), pages 78-101.
    14. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    15. Johanna Gast & Andreas Kallmünzer & Sascha Kraus & Katherine Gundolf & Judith Arnold, 2019. "Coopetition of small-and medium-sized family enterprises: insights from an IT business network," Post-Print hal-02945298, HAL.
    16. Mekhail Mustak & Joni Salminen & Loïc Plé & Jochen Wirtz, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda," Post-Print hal-03269994, HAL.
    17. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    18. Amado, Alexandra & Cortez, Paulo & Rita, Paulo & Moro, Sérgio, 2018. "Research Trends On Big Data In Marketing: A Text Mining And Topic Modeling Based Literature Analysis," European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 24(1), pages 1-7.
    19. Christensen, Jens Froslev & Olesen, Michael Holm & Kjaer, Jonas Sorth, 2005. "The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation--Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1533-1549, December.
    20. Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele & Cricelli, Livio, 2016. "An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 501-516.
    21. Lu, Qinli & Chesbrough, Henry, 2022. "Measuring open innovation practices through topic modelling: Revisiting their impact on firm financial performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    22. Ritika Chopra & Anirudh Agrawal & Gagan Deep Sharma & Andreas Kallmuenzer & Laszlo Vasa, 2024. "Uncovering the organizational, environmental, and socio-economic sustainability of digitization: evidence from existing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 685-709, February.
    23. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    24. Cricelli, Livio & Mauriello, Roberto & Strazzullo, Serena, 2023. "Preventing open innovation failures: A managerial framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    25. Noh, Heeyong & Lee, Sungjoo, 2020. "What constitutes a promising technology in the era of open innovation? An investigation of patent potential from multiple perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    26. Erjia Yan, 2014. "Topic-based Pagerank: toward a topic-level scientific evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 407-437, August.
    27. Dabić, Marina & Daim, Tugrul & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Mention, Anne-Laure, 2023. "The limits of open innovation: Failures, risks, and costs in open innovation practice and theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    28. Kelchtermans, Stijn & Leten, Bart & Rabijns, Maarten & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2022. "Do licensors learn from out-licensing? Empirical evidence from the pharmaceutical industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    29. Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Sonia Dasí-Rodríguez, 2020. "The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1023-1042, September.
    30. Omar Carrasco-Carvajal & Mauricio Castillo-Vergara & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2023. "Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 397-442, February.
    31. Marco Greco & Serena Strazzullo & Livio Cricelli & Michele Grimaldi & Benito Mignacca, 2022. "The fine line between success and failure: an analysis of open innovation projects," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(6), pages 687-715, April.
    32. Xue, Jinjie & Liu, Junqi & Geng, Zizhen & Yuan, Hongping & Chao, Lei, 2023. "Why and when do paradoxical management capabilities matter to paradoxical pressure? An empirical investigation of the role of coopetition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    33. Alberto Bertello & Paola Bernardi & Francesca Ricciardi, 2024. "Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 633-683, February.
    34. Marcel Bogers & Ann-Kristin Zobel & Allan Afuah & Esteve Almirall & Sabine Brunswicker & Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen & Annabelle Gawer & Marc Gruber & Stefan Haefliger & John Hagedoorn & Dennis, 2017. "The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 8-40, January.
    35. Hakyeon Lee & Pilsung Kang, 2018. "Identifying core topics in technology and innovation management studies: a topic model approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1291-1317, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Bertello & Paola Bernardi & Francesca Ricciardi, 2024. "Open innovation: status quo and quo vadis - an analysis of a research field," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 633-683, February.
    2. Keld Laursen & Ammon Salter, 2023. "What we know about open innovation, unresolved issues, and a checklist for future research," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(4), pages 743-764, December.
    3. Alexander Brem & Petra A. Nylund & Saeed Roshani, 2024. "Unpacking the complexities of crisis innovation: a comprehensive review of ecosystem-level responses to exogenous shocks," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2441-2464, August.
    4. Saura, Jose Ramon & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2023. "Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Lu, Qinli & Chesbrough, Henry, 2022. "Measuring open innovation practices through topic modelling: Revisiting their impact on firm financial performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    6. Sithipolvanichgul, Juthamon & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet, 2025. "Decomposition of double-loop failure risk in post-innovation failure phase," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez & Eva-María Mora-Valentín, 2018. "A Research Agenda on Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Co-Word Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Lopes, Ana Paula Vilas Boas Viveiros & de Carvalho, Marly Monteiro, 2018. "Evolution of the open innovation paradigm: Towards a contingent conceptual model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 284-298.
    9. Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele & Locatelli, Giorgio & Serafini, Mattia, 2021. "How does open innovation enhance productivity? An exploration in the construction ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Chen, Jiangtao & Cai, Wenyu & Luo, Jiamei & Mao, Hongyi, 2025. "How does digital trust boost open innovation? Evidence from a mixed approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    11. Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Dominique Philippe Martin & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2021. "Capacity of open innovation activities in fostering product and process innovation in manufacturing SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2137-2164, October.
    12. Ogink, Ruben H.A.J. & Goossen, Martin C. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Akkermans, Henk, 2023. "Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Colin C. J. Cheng & Eric C. Shiu, 2021. "Establishing a typology of open innovation strategies and their differential impacts on innovation success in an Asia-Pacific developed economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 65-89, March.
    14. Dahlander, Linus & Gann, David M. & Wallin, Martin W., 2021. "How open is innovation? A retrospective and ideas forward," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    15. Hamza Smajić & Ramo Palalić & Irfan Butt & Nisar Ahmed & Veland Ramadani, 2025. "Socioemotional wealth and family firms performance: a framework and future pathways," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1257-1296, April.
    16. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Verreynne, Martie-Louise & Steen, John & Indulska, Marta, 2021. "Creating value by giving away: A typology of different innovation revealing strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 137-150.
    17. Idika Awa Uduma & Andy Fred Wali & Len Tiu Wright, 2015. "A quantitative study on the influence of breadth of open innovation on SMEs product-service performance: The moderating effect of type of innovation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1120421-112, December.
    18. Barrett, Gillian & Dooley, Lawrence & Bogue, Joe, 2021. "Open innovation within high-tech SMEs: A study of the entrepreneurial founder's influence on open innovation practices," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Valentín VittoriRomero & Aurora Pérez-Pérez, 2025. "Evolution and trends of the metaverse in business and management: A bibliometric analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 197-222, January.
    20. Patrycja Klimas & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Karina Sachpazidu, 2025. "Operationalization of coopetition performance: challenge accepted," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 2039-2079, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O36 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Open Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:19:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11846-024-00804-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.