IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v15y2021i4d10.1007_s11846-020-00378-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good gamers, good managers? A proof-of-concept study with Sid Meier’s Civilization

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Simons

    (University of Liechtenstein)

  • Isabell Wohlgenannt

    (University of Liechtenstein)

  • Markus Weinmann

    (Erasmus University)

  • Stefan Fleischer

    (University of Münster)

Abstract

Human resource professionals increasingly enhance their assessment tools with game elements—a process typically referred to as “gamification”—to make them more interesting and engaging for candidates, and they design and use “serious games” that can support skill assessment and development. However, commercial, off-the-shelf video games are not or are only rarely used to screen or test candidates, even though there is increasing evidence that they are indicative of various skills that are professionally valuable. Using the strategy game Civilization, this proof-of-concept study explores if strategy video games are indicative of managerial skills and, if so, of what managerial skills. Under controlled laboratory conditions, we asked forty business students to play the Civilization game and to participate in a series of assessment exercises. We find that students who had high scores in the game had better skills related to problem-solving and organizing and planning than the students who had low scores. In addition, a preliminary analysis of in-game data, including players’ interactions and chat messages, suggests that strategy games such as Civilization may be used for more precise and holistic “stealth assessments,” including personality assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Simons & Isabell Wohlgenannt & Markus Weinmann & Stefan Fleischer, 2021. "Good gamers, good managers? A proof-of-concept study with Sid Meier’s Civilization," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 957-990, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00378-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00378-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-020-00378-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-020-00378-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas & Winsborough, Dave & Sherman, Ryne A. & Hogan, Robert, 2016. "New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World?," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 621-640, September.
    2. Brian D Glass & W Todd Maddox & Bradley C Love, 2013. "Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-7, August.
    3. Jansen, Paul & Stoop, Bert, 2001. "The dynamics of assessment center validity: results of a seven year study," Serie Research Memoranda 0030, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Armstrong, Michael B. & Ferrell, Jared Z. & Collmus, Andrew B. & Landers, Richard N., 2016. "Correcting Misconceptions About Gamification of Assessment: More Than SJTs and Badges," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 671-677, September.
    5. Morelli, Neil & Potosky, Denise & Arthur, Winfred & Tippins, Nancy, 2017. "A Call for Conceptual Models of Technology in I-O Psychology: An Example From Technology-Based Talent Assessment," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(4), pages 634-653, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koch, Marco & Becker, Nicolas & Spinath, Frank M. & Greiff, Samuel, 2021. "Assessing intelligence without intelligence tests. Future perspectives," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Brauner, Philipp & Ziefle, Martina, 2022. "Beyond playful learning – Serious games for the human-centric digital transformation of production and a design process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    2. Neelam Kaushal & Rahul Pratap Singh Kaurav & Brijesh Sivathanu & Neeraj Kaushik, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 455-493, June.
    3. Piotr Tomasz Makowski & Yuya Kajikawa, 2021. "Automation-driven innovation management? Toward Innovation-Automation-Strategy cycle," Papers 2103.02395, arXiv.org.
    4. Richard N. Landers & Elena M. Auer & Andrew B. Collmus & Michael B. Armstrong, 2018. "Gamification Science, Its History and Future: Definitions and a Research Agenda," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(3), pages 315-337, June.
    5. Alina Köchling & Shirin Riazy & Marius Claus Wehner & Katharina Simbeck, 2021. "Highly Accurate, But Still Discriminatory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 39-54, February.
    6. Jansen, Paul, 2003. "Thirteen years after. Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate long-term assessment center validity," Serie Research Memoranda 0018, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    7. Arthur, Winfred & Keiser, Nathanael L. & Hagen, Ellen & Traylor, Zach, 2018. "Unproctored internet-based device-type effects on test scores: The role of working memory," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 67-75.
    8. Makowski, Piotr Tomasz & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2021. "Automation-driven innovation management? Toward Innovation-Automation-Strategy cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. Richard A. Oxarart & Jeffery D. Houghton, 2021. "A Spoonful of Sugar: Gamification as Means for Enhancing Employee Self-Leadership and Self-Concordance at Work," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Anna Lena Hunkenschroer & Christoph Luetge, 2022. "Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 977-1007, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Assessment; Gamification; Recruitment; Human resources; Serious games; Video games;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00378-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.