IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i1p135-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of a new DEMATEL to explore key factors of China’s corporate social responsibility: evidence from accounting experts

Author

Listed:
  • Fu Chen
  • Der-Jang Chi

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting focuses on the disclosure of information, however, the information reported is all too often determined by what the company deems important. To improve the reliability of CSR information and to enhance stakeholders’ confidence, CSR reports are now often reviewed by certified public accountants. This study attempts to explore the key factors in Chinese CSR from the perspective of accounting experts. The data obtained from interviews with experts were analyzed using the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) to construct the dimensions and sub-factors of China’s CSR, to determine the impact of each dimension, and to ascertain the mutual impact among the sub-factors, from which to construct an influential network relation map. Among the CSR dimensions, four were found to be mutually influential with “Safety Production” being the most influential dimension. Based on the analysis of expert interviews, it is suggested that CSR improvement should be made in the following order: Safety Production (A) _Environmental Protection (C) _Product Quality (B) _ Employment Promotion (D). Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Fu Chen & Der-Jang Chi, 2015. "Application of a new DEMATEL to explore key factors of China’s corporate social responsibility: evidence from accounting experts," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 135-154, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:135-154
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-013-9978-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-013-9978-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-013-9978-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamad-Ali Afsharkazemi & Jila Manouchehri & Mojtaba Salarifar & Amir Nasiripour, 2013. "Key factors affecting the hospital performance: a qualitative study using fuzzy logic," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3559-3573, October.
    2. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 111-132, December.
    3. Costanza Consolandi & Ameeta Jaiswal-Dale & Elisa Poggiani & Alessandro Vercelli, 2009. "Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 185-197, April.
    4. Michael Robinson & Anne Kleffner & Stephanie Bertels, 2011. "Signaling Sustainability Leadership: Empirical Evidence of the Value of DJSI Membership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 493-505, July.
    5. Arménio Rego & Susana Leal & Miguel Cunha & Jorge Faria & Carlos Pinho, 2010. "How the Perceptions of Five Dimensions of Corporate Citizenship and Their Inter-Inconsistencies Predict Affective Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 107-127, June.
    6. María González-Rodríguez & María Díaz-Fernández & Marek Pawlak & Biagio Simonetti, 2013. "Perceptions of students university of corporate social responsibility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2361-2377, June.
    7. W-H Tsai & W-C Chou & W Hsu, 2009. "The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for selecting socially responsible investment: an effective MCDM model," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1396-1410, October.
    8. Chieh-Peng Lin, 2010. "Modeling Corporate Citizenship, Organizational Trust, and Work Engagement Based on Attachment Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(4), pages 517-531, July.
    9. I-Shuo Chen & Jui-Kuei Chen, 2013. "Present and future: a trend forecasting and ranking of university types for innovative development from an intellectual capital perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 335-352, January.
    10. Aleksandra Kacperczyk, 2009. "With greater power comes greater responsibility? takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 261-285, March.
    11. Tsai, Wen-Hsien & Chou, Wen-Chin & Lai, Chien-Wen, 2010. "An effective evaluation model and improvement analysis for national park websites: A case study of Taiwan," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 936-952.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuang-Hua Hu & Wei Jianguo & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2017. "Risk Factor Assessment Improvement for China’s Cloud Computing Auditing Using a New Hybrid MADM Model," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 737-777, May.
    2. Dmitry Nazarov & Yerkebulan Baimukhambetov, 2022. "Clustering of Dark Patterns in the User Interfaces of Websites and Online Trading Portals (E-Commerce)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Hongbo Jiang & Qigan Shao & James J.H. Liou & Ting Shao & Xiaosheng Shi, 2019. "Improving the Sustainability of Open Government Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Kuang-Hua Hu & Fu-Hsiang Chen & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "Evaluating the Improvement of Sustainability of Sports Industry Policy Based on MADM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Chihkang Kenny Wu & Chia-Nan Wang & Thi Kim Trang Le & Nhat-Luong Nhieu, 2022. "Sustainable Agritourism Location Investigation in Vietnam by a Spherical Fuzzy Extension of Integrated Decision-Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Dmitry Nazarov & Aliya Bayakhmetova & Lyazzat Bayakhmetova & Leila Bayakhmetova, 2022. "A Model for Assessing the Causality of Factors in the Development of Voluntary Pension Insurance in the Republic of Kazakhstan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selena Aureli & Sabrina Gigli & Renato Medei & Enrico Supino, 2020. "The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Evidence from Dow Jones Sustainability World Index listed companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 43-52, January.
    2. Isabel Lourenço & Manuel Branco & José Curto & Teresa Eugénio, 2012. "How Does the Market Value Corporate Sustainability Performance?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 417-428, July.
    3. Madeeha Zafar & Imran Ali, 2016. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Commitment: The Mediating Role of Employee Company Identification," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 262-262, December.
    4. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Elisa Aracil, 2017. "European Banks' Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Isabel Lourenço & Jeffrey Callen & Manuel Branco & José Curto, 2014. "The Value Relevance of Reputation for Sustainability Leadership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 17-28, January.
    6. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    7. Saskia Crucke & Adelien Decramer, 2016. "The Development of a Measurement Instrument for the Organizational Performance of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Miwa Nakai & Keiko Yamaguchi & Kenji Takeuchi, 2012. "Sustainability membership and stock price: an empirical study using the Morningstar-SRI Index," Discussion Papers 1204, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    10. Zhang, Zhongqingyang & Zhu, Huiming & Zhou, Zhongbao & Zou, Kai, 2022. "How does innovation matter for sustainable performance? Evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 251-265.
    11. Rimsha Naz & Danish Ahmed Siddiqui, 2021. "Exploring the Link between Corporate Reputation with Sustainability Leadership and Market Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of Award and Non-Award Companies in PSX," Global Journal of Educational Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 19-53, June.
    12. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Ben Zaied, Younes & Managi, Shunsuke & Taleb, Lotfi, 2022. "Re-thinking about U: The relevance of regime-switching model in the relationship between environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 498-519.
    13. Jonathan Luffarelli & Amrou Awaysheh, 2018. "The Impact of Indirect Corporate Social Performance Signals on Firm Value: Evidence from an Event Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 295-310, May.
    14. Liang, Lien-Wen & Chang, Hai-Yen & Shao, Hao-Ling, 2018. "Does sustainability make banks more cost efficient?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 13-23.
    15. Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha & Erick Meira de Oliveira & Renato J. Orsato & Marcelo Cabus Klotzle & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2020. "Can sustainable investments outperform traditional benchmarks? Evidence from global stock markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 682-697, February.
    16. Moonsoo Kang & K. G. Viswanathan & Nancy A. White & Edward J. Zychowicz, 2022. "Sustainability Efforts, Index Recognition, and Stock Performance," Springer Books, in: Marielle de Jong & Dan diBartolomeo (ed.), Risks Related to Environmental, Social and Governmental Issues (ESG), pages 45-57, Springer.
    17. Jie Chen & Xicheng Liu & Wei Song, 2018. "CEO general managerial skills and corporate social responsibility," Working Papers 2018-16, Swansea University, School of Management.
    18. Chih‐Wei Peng, 2020. "The role of business strategy and CEO compensation structure in driving corporate social responsibility: Linkage towards a sustainable development perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1028-1039, March.
    19. James Cordeiro & Manish Tewari, 2015. "Firm Characteristics, Industry Context, and Investor Reactions to Environmental CSR: A Stakeholder Theory Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 833-849, September.
    20. Alexis Cellier & Pierre Chollet & Souad Lajili Jarjir, 2013. "New empirical evidence on market reactions to changes in Socially Responsible Investment indexes," Post-Print hal-01367120, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:135-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.