IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v43y2009i4p535-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative methodology and its pitfalls in educational research

Author

Listed:
  • Mansoor Niaz

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mansoor Niaz, 2009. "Qualitative methodology and its pitfalls in educational research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 535-551, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:535-551
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-007-9136-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-007-9136-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-007-9136-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Sale & Kevin Brazil, 2004. "A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 351-365, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crooks, Valorie A., 2007. "Exploring the altered daily geographies and lifeworlds of women living with fibromyalgia syndrome: A mixed-method approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 577-588, February.
    2. Stewart, Miriam & Makwarimba, Edward & Barnfather, Alison & Letourneau, Nicole & Neufeld, Anne, 2008. "Researching reducing health disparities: Mixed-methods approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1406-1417, March.
    3. Sanne Akkerman & Wilfried Admiraal & Mieke Brekelmans & Heinze Oost, 2008. "Auditing Quality of Research in Social Sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 257-274, April.
    4. Achim Goerres & Katrin Prinzen, 2012. "Using mixed methods for the analysis of individuals: a review of necessary and sufficient conditions and an application to welfare state attitudes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 415-450, February.
    5. Sergi Fàbregues & José F. Molina-Azorín, 2017. "Addressing quality in mixed methods research: a review and recommendations for a future agenda," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2847-2863, November.
    6. Olatz Lopez-Fernandez & Jose Molina-Azorin, 2011. "The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1459-1472, October.
    7. H. Boeije & F. Wesel & M. Slagt, 2014. "Guidance for deciding upon use of primary mixed methods studies in research synthesis: lessons learned in childhood trauma," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1075-1088, March.
    8. Sandelowski, Margarete & Voils, Corrine I. & Barroso, Julie, 2007. "Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 236-247, January.
    9. Liao, Chuan & Erbaugh, James T. & Kelly, Allison C. & Agrawal, Arun, 2021. "Clean energy transitions and human well-being outcomes in Lower and Middle Income Countries: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    10. Rosas, Scott R. & Kane, Mary, 2012. "Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 236-245.
    11. Yulia Kartalova-O'Doherty & Donna Tedstone Doherty, 2009. "Satisfied Carers of Persons With Enduring Mental Illness: Who and Why?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(3), pages 257-271, May.
    12. Mayra Carrión-Toro & Jose Aguilar & Marco Santórum & María Pérez & Boris Astudillo & Cindy-Pamela Lopez & Marcelo Nieto & Patricia Acosta-Vargas, 2022. "iKeyCriteria: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Method to Infer Key Criteria since a Systematic Literature Review for the Computing Domain," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:43:y:2009:i:4:p:535-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.