IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v83y2018i3d10.1007_s11336-017-9596-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequential Detection of Compromised Items Using Response Times in Computerized Adaptive Testing

Author

Listed:
  • Edison M. Choe

    (Graduate Management Admission Council® (GMAC®))

  • Jinming Zhang

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Hua-Hua Chang

    (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Abstract

Item compromise persists in undermining the integrity of testing, even secure administrations of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) with sophisticated item exposure controls. In ongoing efforts to tackle this perennial security issue in CAT, a couple of recent studies investigated sequential procedures for detecting compromised items, in which a significant increase in the proportion of correct responses for each item in the pool is monitored in real time using moving averages. In addition to actual responses, response times are valuable information with tremendous potential to reveal items that may have been leaked. Specifically, examinees that have preknowledge of an item would likely respond more quickly to it than those who do not. Therefore, the current study proposes several augmented methods for the detection of compromised items, all involving simultaneous monitoring of changes in both the proportion correct and average response time for every item using various moving average strategies. Simulation results with an operational item pool indicate that, compared to the analysis of responses alone, utilizing response times can afford marked improvements in detection power with fewer false positives.

Suggested Citation

  • Edison M. Choe & Jinming Zhang & Hua-Hua Chang, 2018. "Sequential Detection of Compromised Items Using Response Times in Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 650-673, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:83:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-017-9596-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9596-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-017-9596-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-017-9596-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua-Hua Chang, 2015. "Psychometrics Behind Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Wim van der Linden, 2007. "A Hierarchical Framework for Modeling Speed and Accuracy on Test Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 287-308, September.
    3. Michael Levine & Fritz Drasgow, 1988. "Optimal appropriateness measurement," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 161-176, June.
    4. Wim J. van der Linden, 2006. "A Lognormal Model for Response Times on Test Items," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 31(2), pages 181-204, June.
    5. Hua-Hua Chang & Zhiliang Ying, 2008. "To Weight or Not to Weight? Balancing Influence of Initial Items in Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 441-450, September.
    6. Robert Mislevy & Hua-Hua Chang, 2000. "Does adaptive testing violate local independence?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 149-156, June.
    7. Wim Linden & Charles Lewis, 2015. "Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 689-706, September.
    8. Edith M.L.A. van Krimpen-Stoop & Rob R. Meijer, 2001. "CUSUM-Based Person-Fit Statistics for Adaptive Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 26(2), pages 199-217, June.
    9. Martha L. Stocking & Charles Lewis, 1998. "Controlling Item Exposure Conditional on Ability in Computerized Adaptive Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 23(1), pages 57-75, March.
    10. Wim J. van der Linden, 2003. "Some Alternatives to Sympson-Hetter Item-Exposure Control in Computerized Adaptive Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 28(3), pages 249-265, September.
    11. Wim Linden & Edith Krimpen-Stoop, 2003. "Using response times to detect aberrant responses in computerized adaptive testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 251-265, June.
    12. Hua-Hua Chang & William Stout, 1993. "The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait in an IRT model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 37-52, March.
    13. Wim Linden & Fanmin Guo, 2008. "Bayesian Procedures for Identifying Aberrant Response-Time Patterns in Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 365-384, September.
    14. Irini Moustaki & Martin Knott, 2014. "Latent variable models that account for atypical responses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 343-360, February.
    15. Sukaesi Marianti & Jean-Paul Fox & Marianna Avetisyan & Bernard P. Veldkamp & Jesper Tijmstra, 2014. "Testing for Aberrant Behavior in Response Time Modeling," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 426-451, December.
    16. Kikumi Tatsuoka, 1984. "Caution indices based on item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(1), pages 95-110, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongyue Zhu & Hong Jiao & Wei Gao & Xiangbin Meng, 2023. "Bayesian Change-Point Analysis Approach to Detecting Aberrant Test-Taking Behavior Using Response Times," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(4), pages 490-520, August.
    2. Hyeon-Ah Kang, 2023. "Sequential Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests for Online Item Monitoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 672-696, June.
    3. Yunxiao Chen & Yi-Hsuan Lee & Xiaoou Li, 2022. "Item Pool Quality Control in Educational Testing: Change Point Model, Compound Risk, and Sequential Detection," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(3), pages 322-352, June.
    4. Chen, Yunxiao & Lee, Yi-Hsuan & Li, Xiaoou, 2022. "Item pool quality control in educational testing: change point model, compound risk, and sequential detection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112498, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Yi-Hsuan Lee & Charles Lewis, 2021. "Monitoring Item Performance With CUSUM Statistics in Continuous Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(5), pages 611-648, October.
    6. Onur Demirkaya & Ummugul Bezirhan & Jinming Zhang, 2023. "Detecting Item Preknowledge Using Revisits With Speed and Accuracy," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(4), pages 521-542, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun Wang & Gongjun Xu & Zhuoran Shang, 2018. "A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 223-254, March.
    2. Hua-Hua Chang, 2015. "Psychometrics Behind Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Maria Bolsinova & Paul Boeck & Jesper Tijmstra, 2017. "Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1126-1148, December.
    4. Dylan Molenaar & Paul Boeck, 2018. "Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(2), pages 279-297, June.
    5. Hongyue Zhu & Hong Jiao & Wei Gao & Xiangbin Meng, 2023. "Bayesian Change-Point Analysis Approach to Detecting Aberrant Test-Taking Behavior Using Response Times," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(4), pages 490-520, August.
    6. Hyeon-Ah Kang & Yi Zheng & Hua-Hua Chang, 2020. "Online Calibration of a Joint Model of Item Responses and Response Times in Computerized Adaptive Testing," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(2), pages 175-208, April.
    7. Jochen Ranger, 2013. "A Note on the Hierarchical Model for Responses and Response Times in Tests of van der Linden (2007)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 538-544, July.
    8. Steffi Pohl & Esther Ulitzsch & Matthias Davier, 2019. "Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 892-920, September.
    9. Chun Wang & Hua-Hua Chang & Keith Boughton, 2011. "Kullback–Leibler Information and Its Applications in Multi-Dimensional Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 13-39, January.
    10. Ping Chen & Chun Wang, 2016. "A New Online Calibration Method for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 674-701, September.
    11. Hyeon-Ah Kang, 2023. "Sequential Generalized Likelihood Ratio Tests for Online Item Monitoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 672-696, June.
    12. Sandip Sinharay & Peter W. van Rijn, 2020. "Assessing Fit of the Lognormal Model for Response Times," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(5), pages 534-568, October.
    13. Renske E. Kuijpers & Ingmar Visser & Dylan Molenaar, 2021. "Testing the Within-State Distribution in Mixture Models for Responses and Response Times," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(3), pages 348-373, June.
    14. David Magis & Gilles Raîche & Sébastien Béland, 2012. "A Didactic Presentation of Snijders’s lz* Index of Person Fit With Emphasis on Response Model Selection and Ability Estimation," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(1), pages 57-81, February.
    15. Chun Wang & Hua-Hua Chang, 2011. "Item Selection in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing—Gaining Information from Different Angles," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 363-384, July.
    16. Onur Demirkaya & Ummugul Bezirhan & Jinming Zhang, 2023. "Detecting Item Preknowledge Using Revisits With Speed and Accuracy," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(4), pages 521-542, August.
    17. Wim J. van der Linden, 2009. "A Bivariate Lognormal Response-Time Model for the Detection of Collusion Between Test Takers," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 34(3), pages 378-394, September.
    18. M. Marsman & H. Sigurdardóttir & M. Bolsinova & G. Maris, 2019. "Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(3), pages 870-891, September.
    19. Yue Liu & Hongyun Liu, 2021. "Detecting Noneffortful Responses Based on a Residual Method Using an Iterative Purification Process," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 717-752, December.
    20. Karl Klauer, 1991. "An exact and optimal standardized person test for assessing consistency with the rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 213-228, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:83:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-017-9596-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.