IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v45y1980i1p3-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters

Author

Listed:
  • J. Douglas Carroll
  • Sandra Pruzansky
  • Joseph Kruskal

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Douglas Carroll & Sandra Pruzansky & Joseph Kruskal, 1980. "Candelinc: A general approach to multidimensional analysis of many-way arrays with linear constraints on parameters," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(1), pages 3-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:45:y:1980:i:1:p:3-24
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02293596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02293596
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02293596?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green, Paul E. & Carroll, J. Douglas & Carmone, Frank J., 1976. "Superordinate factorial designs in the analysis of consumer judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 281-295, November.
    2. Richard Johnson, 1966. "The minimal transformation to orthonormality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 31(1), pages 61-66, March.
    3. Bruce Bloxom, 1978. "Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 397-408, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariela González-Narváez & María José Fernández-Gómez & Susana Mendes & José-Luis Molina & Omar Ruiz-Barzola & Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2021. "Study of Temporal Variations in Species–Environment Association through an Innovative Multivariate Method: MixSTATICO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Tomasi, Giorgio & Bro, Rasmus, 2006. "A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1700-1734, April.
    3. Wayne DeSarbo & Vithala Rao, 1984. "GENFOLD2: A set of models and algorithms for the general UnFOLDing analysis of preference/dominance data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 1(1), pages 147-186, December.
    4. Arie Kapteyn & Heinz Neudecker & Tom Wansbeek, 1986. "An approach ton-mode components analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 269-275, June.
    5. Kamel Jedidi & Wayne DeSarbo, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the spatial representation of three-mode, three-way pick any/J data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(3), pages 471-494, September.
    6. Yoshio Takane & Tadashi Shibayama, 1991. "Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 97-120, March.
    7. J. E. Abdou & E. Safatly & B. Nakhle & A. El Khoury, 2017. "High-Dimensional Nash Equilibria Problems and Tensors Applications," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-25, September.
    8. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    9. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    10. Takane, Yoshio & Jung, Kwanghee & Hwang, Heungsun, 2011. "Regularized reduced rank growth curve models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 1041-1052, February.
    11. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    12. Keith Poole, 1990. "Least squares metric, unidimensional scaling of multivariate linear models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 123-149, March.
    13. J. Carroll & Geert Soete & Sandra Pruzansky, 1989. "An evaluation of five algorithms for generating an initial configuration for SINDSCAL," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119, December.
    14. Willem Heiser, 2013. "In memoriam, J. Douglas Carroll 1939–2011," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 5-13, January.
    15. Yoshio Takane & Henk Kiers & Jan Leeuw, 1995. "Component analysis with different sets of constraints on different dimensions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 259-280, June.
    16. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    17. Yoshio Takane & Haruo Yanai & Shinichi Mayekawa, 1991. "Relationships among several methods of linearly constrained correspondence analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 667-684, December.
    18. Duncan Fong & Wayne DeSarbo & Zhe Chen & Zhuying Xu, 2015. "A Bayesian Vector Multidimensional Scaling Procedure Incorporating Dimension Reparameterization with Variable Selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 1043-1065, December.
    19. Wayne DeSarbo & Michael Johnson & Ajay Manrai & Lalita Manrai & Elizabeth Edwards, 1992. "Tscale: A new multidimensional scaling procedure based on tversky's contrast model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 43-69, March.
    20. Henk Kiers & Yoshio Takane, 1993. "Constrained DEDICOM," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 339-355, June.
    21. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.
    22. Timmerman, Marieke E. & Kiers, Henk A. L., 2002. "Three-way component analysis with smoothness constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 447-470, September.
    23. Geert Soete & Suzanne Winsberg, 1993. "A latent class vector model for preference ratings," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 10(2), pages 195-218, December.
    24. Timmerman, Marieke E. & Ter Braak, Cajo J.F., 2008. "Bootstrap confidence intervals for principal response curves," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1837-1849, January.
    25. Gildas Brossier & Pierre Legendre & Ronald Breiger & Dawn Iacobucci & A. Coxon & Jos Berge & Willem Heiser, 1988. "Book reviews," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 5(2), pages 283-304, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Weeks & P. Bentler, 1982. "Restricted multidimensional scaling models for asymmetric proximities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 201-208, June.
    2. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    3. Bert Green, 1969. "Best linear composites with a specified structure," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 34(3), pages 301-318, September.
    4. Yoshio Takane & Tadashi Shibayama, 1991. "Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 97-120, March.
    5. J. Carroll, 1985. "Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 133-140, March.
    6. Jacqueline Meulman & Peter Verboon, 1993. "Points of view analysis revisited: Fitting multidimensional structures to optimal distance components with cluster restrictions on the variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 7-35, March.
    7. Wayne DeSarbo & Jaewun Cho, 1989. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector threshold model for the spatial representation of “pick any/n” data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 105-129, March.
    8. Douglas Clarkson & Richard Gonzalez, 2001. "Random effects diagonal metric multidimensional scaling models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 25-43, March.
    9. W. Alan Nicewander & Joseph Lee Rodgers, 2022. "Obituary: Bruce McArthur Bloxom 1938–2020," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1042-1044, September.
    10. J. Ramsay, 1980. "The joint analysis of direct ratings, pairwise preferences, and dissimilarities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 149-165, June.
    11. W. Gibson, 1967. "Properties and applications of gramian factoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(4), pages 425-434, December.
    12. Geert Soete & Suzanne Winsberg, 1993. "A latent class vector model for preference ratings," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 10(2), pages 195-218, December.
    13. James Price & W. Nicewander, 1977. "Maximally correlated orthogonal composites and oblique factor analytic solutions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 439-442, September.
    14. Stan Lipovetsky & W. Michael Conklin, 2015. "Predictor relative importance and matching regression parameters," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 1017-1031, May.
    15. Wayne DeSarbo & Michael Johnson & Ajay Manrai & Lalita Manrai & Elizabeth Edwards, 1992. "Tscale: A new multidimensional scaling procedure based on tversky's contrast model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 43-69, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:45:y:1980:i:1:p:3-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.