IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v38y2016i1d10.1007_s00291-015-0424-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost allocation for less-than-truckload collaboration among perishable product retailers

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Li

    (Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Xiaoqiang Cai

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)

  • Yinlian Zeng

    (The Chinese University of Hong Kong)

Abstract

We study cost allocation problem arising from less-than-truckload collaboration among perishable product retailers. The relevant costs we consider include fixed transportation cost, variable transportation cost, and decay loss of perishable products. Cooperative game theory is applied to study this cost allocation problem. The corresponding cooperative game, called transportation facility choice game, is established. First, we show that the core of the transportation facility choice game is non-empty. Then, we identify some conditions for concavity and quasi-concavity of the transportation facility choice game with the linear decay and negative exponential decay functions, respectively. Finally, simulation is conducted to analyze how optimal solutions differ under the linear decay and exponential decay functions, and intuitive cost allocation schemes are proposed and compared with the $$\tau $$ τ -value and the Shapley value of the corresponding game. Simulation results show that the optimal solution under linear decay function tends to choose facilities with higher fixed cost than that under exponential decay function. Additionally, among all the cost allocation schemes compared, the simple cost allocation scheme called A-IM, the $$\tau $$ τ -value, and the Shapley value have better performance in terms of the percentage of allocations lying in the core.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Li & Xiaoqiang Cai & Yinlian Zeng, 2016. "Cost allocation for less-than-truckload collaboration among perishable product retailers," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 81-117, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00291-015-0424-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-015-0424-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-015-0424-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-015-0424-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M A Krajewska & H Kopfer & G Laporte & S Ropke & G Zaccour, 2008. "Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: request allocation and profit sharing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1483-1491, November.
    2. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Driessen, T. & Tijs, S.H., 1983. "The t-value, the nucleolus and the core for a subclass of games," Other publications TiSEM 73fdfe73-c88c-4a9f-8ee7-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Yilmaz, Ozhan & Savasaneril, Secil, 2012. "Collaboration among small shippers in a transportation market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 408-415.
    5. Homburg, Carsten & Scherpereel, Peter, 2008. "How should the cost of joint risk capital be allocated for performance measurement?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 208-227, May.
    6. Cruijssen, Frans & Borm, Peter & Fleuren, Hein & Hamers, Herbert, 2010. "Supplier-initiated outsourcing: A methodology to exploit synergy in transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 763-774, December.
    7. Fujiwara, Okitsugu & Perera, U. L. J. S. R., 1993. "EOQ models for continuously deteriorating products using linear and exponential penalty costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 104-114, October.
    8. Christine Nguyen & Alejandro Toriello & Maged Dessouky & James E. Moore, 2013. "Evaluation of Transportation Practices in the California Cut Flower Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 182-193, April.
    9. Zhou, Guanghui & Hui, Yer Van & Liang, Liang, 2011. "Strategic alliance in freight consolidation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 18-29, January.
    10. Tijs, S.H. & Driessen, T.S.H., 1986. "Game theory and cost allocation problems," Other publications TiSEM 376c24c5-c95d-4d29-96b6-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Steven Nahmias, 1982. "Perishable Inventory Theory: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 680-708, August.
    12. S. H. Tijs & T. S. H. Driessen, 1986. "Game Theory and Cost Allocation Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(8), pages 1015-1028, August.
    13. Cruijssen, F., 2006. "Horizontal cooperation in transport and logistics," Other publications TiSEM ab6dbe68-aebc-4b03-8eea-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Okan Örsan Özener & Özlem Ergun & Martin Savelsbergh, 2011. "Lane-Exchange Mechanisms for Truckload Carrier Collaboration," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Okan Örsan Özener & Özlem Ergun, 2008. "Allocating Costs in a Collaborative Transportation Procurement Network," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 146-165, May.
    16. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    17. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C., 2001. "Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loe Schlicher & Marco Slikker & Geert-Jan Houtum, 2018. "Pooling of critical, low-utilization resources with unavailability," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 233-263, January.
    2. Wang, Min & Zhao, Lindu & Herty, Michael, 2019. "Joint replenishment and carbon trading in fresh food supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 561-573.
    3. Lianmin Zhang & Lei Guan & Yong-Hong Kuo & Houcai Shen, 2019. "Push or Pull? Perishable Products with Freshness-Keeping Effort," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(01), pages 1-29, February.
    4. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    5. Alf Kimms & Herbert Kopfer, 2016. "Collaborative planning in transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 1-2, January.
    6. Heydari, Jafar & Momeni, Behnam, 2021. "Retailers’ coalition and quantity discounts under demand uncertainty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    2. Kellner, Florian & Schneiderbauer, Miriam, 2019. "Further insights into the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions to shipments in road freight transportation: The pollution routing game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 296-313.
    3. Minyoung Yea & Seokhyun Chung & Taesu Cheong & Daeki Kim, 2018. "The Sharing of Benefits from a Logistics Alliance Based on a Hub-Spoke Network: A Cooperative Game Theoretic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Baṣak Altan & Okan Örsan Özener, 2021. "A Game Theoretical Approach for Improving the Operational Efficiencies of Less-than-truckload Carriers Through Load Exchanges," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-579, September.
    5. Yong Wang & Shouguo Peng & Kevin Assogba & Yong Liu & Haizhong Wang & Maozeng Xu & Yinhai Wang, 2018. "Implementation of Cooperation for Recycling Vehicle Routing Optimization in Two-Echelon Reverse Logistics Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Basso, Franco & Guajardo, Mario & Varas, Mauricio, 2020. "Collaborative job scheduling in the wine bottling process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Behzad Hezarkhani & Marco Slikker & Tom Woensel, 2016. "A competitive solution for cooperative truckload delivery," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 51-80, January.
    8. Kimms, A. & Kozeletskyi, I., 2016. "Core-based cost allocation in the cooperative traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 910-916.
    9. Ramaekers, Katrien & Verdonck, Lotte & Caris, An & Meers, Dries & Macharis, Cathy, 2017. "Allocating collaborative costs in multimodal barge networks for freight bundling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 56-69.
    10. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio García-Jurado & Manuel Mosquera, 2011. "Cooperative games and cost allocation problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Defryn, Christof & Sörensen, Kenneth & Dullaert, Wout, 2019. "Integrating partner objectives in horizontal logistics optimisation models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2018. "Collaborative vehicle routing: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 1-12.
    13. Christoph Weissbart, 2018. "Decarbonization of Power Markets under Stability and Fairness: Do They Influence Efficiency?," ifo Working Paper Series 270, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    14. Eren Akyol, Derya & De Koster, René B.M., 2018. "Determining time windows in urban freight transport: A city cooperative approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-50.
    15. Gang Du & Chuanwang Sun & Jinxian Weng, 2016. "Liner Shipping Fleet Deployment with Sustainable Collaborative Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Dóra Balog & Tamás László Bátyi & Péter Csóka & Miklós Pintér, 2014. "Properties of risk capital allocation methods: Core Compatibility, Equal Treatment Property and Strong Monotonicity," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1417, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    17. Chabot, Thomas & Bouchard, Florence & Legault-Michaud, Ariane & Renaud, Jacques & Coelho, Leandro C., 2018. "Service level, cost and environmental optimization of collaborative transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Tobias Hiller, 2022. "Allocation of portfolio risk and outside options," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2845-2848, October.
    19. A. Kimms & I. Kozeletskyi, 2016. "Shapley value-based cost allocation in the cooperative traveling salesman problem under rolling horizon planning," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(4), pages 371-392, December.
    20. Skovsgaard, Lise & Jensen, Ida Græsted, 2018. "Recent trends in biogas value chains explained using cooperative game theory," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 503-522.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s00291-015-0424-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.