IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v108y2021i1d10.1007_s11069-021-04684-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mass evacuation microsimulation modeling considering traffic disruptions

Author

Listed:
  • MD Jahedul Alam

    (Dalhousie University)

  • Muhammad Ahsanul Habib

    (Dalhousie University)

Abstract

This study presents a framework of traffic evacuation microsimulation modeling that accounts for uncertain network disruptions endogenous to traffic operations. While evacuation modeling considers external stresses such as flooding-related network disruptions, the risks inherent to the transport operations, particularly vehicle collisions may also cause disruptions to evacuation traffic flows. This study adopts a combined Bayes theory and Monte Carlo simulation approach to identify collision hotspots and their occurrence over different times of an evacuation day. A traffic evacuation microsimulation model is developed which explicitly incorporates vehicle collision-related disruptions at the hotspots identified by this probabilistic model. The proposed probabilistic approach identifies 128 candidate collision locations within the study area. The probabilities of candidate locations to anticipate a vehicle collision range between 0.21 and 7.0%. Based on the probabilities, the Monte Carlo simulation approach identifies five hotspots for traffic microsimulation modeling of vehicle collisions during the evacuation. The results from the traffic simulation reveal that due to concurrent collision occurrence, evacuation times vary within 23–31 h depending on the time required to remove traffic disruptions from the network. On the other hand, the concurrent collision occurrence at the hotspots increases the complete evacuation time by almost 11 h if the disruption is not removed from the network, an increase of 50%, compared to an evacuation scenario without disruptions. The analysis of simulated queue length reveals that the hotspots’ traffic queues range from 0.28 to 2.06 km depending on their locations in the study area. The study asserts that an evacuation model without the consideration of the network disruptions due to endogenous risks may underestimate the traffic impacts and network clearance time for an evacuation. These results will provide emergency professionals with insights into managing emergency traffic operation subjected to uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • MD Jahedul Alam & Muhammad Ahsanul Habib, 2021. "Mass evacuation microsimulation modeling considering traffic disruptions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 323-346, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04684-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04684-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04684-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04684-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sohn, Jungyul, 2006. "Evaluating the significance of highway network links under the flood damage: An accessibility approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 491-506, July.
    2. Shanjiang Zhu & Nebiyou Tilahun & Xiaozheng He & David M. Levinson, 2012. "Travel Impacts and Adjustment Strategies of the Collapse and the Reopening of the I-35W Bridge," Transportation Research, Economics and Policy, in: David M. Levinson & Henry X. Liu & Michael Bell (ed.), Network Reliability in Practice, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 21-36, Springer.
    3. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    4. Alireza Mostafizi & Haizhong Wang & Dan Cox & Lori A. Cramer & Shangjia Dong, 2017. "Agent-based tsunami evacuation modeling of unplanned network disruptions for evidence-driven resource allocation and retrofitting strategies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1347-1372, September.
    5. David M. Levinson & Henry X. Liu & Michael Bell (ed.), 2012. "Network Reliability in Practice," Transportation Research, Economics and Policy, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4614-0947-2, June.
    6. Satoshi Tsuchiya & Hirokazu Tatano & Norio Okada, 2007. "Economic Loss Assessment due to Railroad and Highway Disruptions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 147-162.
    7. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay & Bekir Bartin, 2015. "Effects of Hurricanes Irene and Sandy in New Jersey: traffic patterns and highway disruptions during evacuations," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 2081-2107, September.
    8. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay, 2015. "Evacuation Planning with Endogenous Transportation Network Degradations: A Stochastic Cell-Based Model and Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 677-696, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muriel-Villegas, Juan E. & Alvarez-Uribe, Karla C. & Patiño-Rodríguez, Carmen E. & Villegas, Juan G., 2016. "Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards – Insights from a Colombian case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 151-165.
    2. Rolf Nyberg & Magnus Johansson, 2013. "Indicators of road network vulnerability to storm-felled trees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 185-199, October.
    3. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    4. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    5. Freiria, Susana & Ribeiro, Bernardete & Tavares, Alexandre O., 2015. "Understanding road network dynamics: Link-based topological patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-66.
    6. Ouyang, Min & Pan, ZheZhe & Hong, Liu & He, Yue, 2015. "Vulnerability analysis of complementary transportation systems with applications to railway and airline systems in China," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 248-257.
    7. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    8. Linjun Lu & Qing-Chang Lu & ABM Sertajur Rahman, 2015. "Residence and Job Location Change Choice Behavior under Flooding and Cyclone Impacts in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Hong, Liu & Ouyang, Min & Peeta, Srinivas & He, Xiaozheng & Yan, Yongze, 2015. "Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 58-68.
    10. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    11. Saini Yang & Fuyu Hu & Carlo Jaeger, 2016. "Impact Factors and Risk Analysis of Tropical Cyclones on a Highway Network," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 262-277, February.
    12. Hong, Liu & Zhong, Xin & Ouyang, Min & Tian, Hui & He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis of public transit systems from the perspective of urban residential communities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 143-156.
    13. Lu, Qing-Chang & Zhang, Junyi & Peng, Zhong-Ren & Rahman, ABM Sertajur, 2014. "Inter-city travel behaviour adaptation to extreme weather events," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 148-153.
    14. Victor Cantillo & Luis F. Macea & Miguel Jaller, 2019. "Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 243-273, March.
    15. Tuzun Aksu, Dilek & Ozdamar, Linet, 2014. "A mathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: Enabling accessibility and evacuation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 56-67.
    16. Oded Cats & Erik Jenelius, 2014. "Dynamic Vulnerability Analysis of Public Transport Networks: Mitigation Effects of Real-Time Information," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 435-463, December.
    17. Juan Carlos García-Palomares & Javier Gutiérrez & Juan Carlos Martín & Borja Moya-Gómez, 2018. "An analysis of the Spanish high capacity road network criticality," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1139-1159, July.
    18. Weiping Wang & Saini Yang & Jianxi Gao & Fuyu Hu & Wanyi Zhao & H. Eugene Stanley, 2020. "An Integrated Approach for Assessing the Impact of Large‐Scale Future Floods on a Highway Transport System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1780-1794, September.
    19. Lu, Qing-Chang & Xu, Peng-Cheng & Zhang, Jingxiao, 2021. "Infrastructure-based transportation network vulnerability modeling and analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 584(C).
    20. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04684-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.