IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/minecn/v35y2022i2d10.1007_s13563-021-00253-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of optimal production rate under price uncertainty—Sari Gunay gold mine, Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Parviz Sohrabi

    (Hamedan University of Technology (HUT))

  • Hesam Dehghani

    (Hamedan University of Technology (HUT))

  • Behshad Jodeiri Shokri

    (Hamedan University of Technology (HUT))

Abstract

Due to the long life, most mining projects face the risk of the parameters such as mineral price, grade, and cost. Uncertainty can lead to unfavorable results of the decisions made by managers and mining investors. Therefore, this paper aims to determine the Sari Gunay gold mine’s production planning, considering the certainty and uncertainty over the mineral price. Finally, the proposed planning will lead to the allocation of fixed or variable production rates throughout the mine life. These findings were assessed by Taylor and Zwiagin methods with 22 different scenarios in all conditions, including (a) price certainty and uncertainty such as daily price, 3- and 5-year average, Monte Carlo simulation, and binomial tree; (b) decreasing, increasing, and fixed production rates; and (c) mine life conditions. The scenarios evaluated under the price certainty conditions (scenarios 1 to 12) have lower NPV values than those under the price uncertainty conditions. This is because the price is fixed throughout the mine life. Due to historical price data and high fluctuations of estimated prices, this method’s NPV values fluctuate more than other scenarios evaluated by the Monte Carlo simulation. The binomial tree method scenarios have the lowest NPV value’s fluctuation because the fluctuation of the estimated prices is controlled, and the highest NPV values are related to this method. Out of the 22 scenarios, scenario 17 has the highest NPV value ($512,642,774). According to this scenario, the mine plan is determined, and the annual production rate is reduced to 3,241,977 tons in the first year and 270,165 tons in the last year with the Taylor life of 12 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Parviz Sohrabi & Hesam Dehghani & Behshad Jodeiri Shokri, 2022. "Determination of optimal production rate under price uncertainty—Sari Gunay gold mine, Iran," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(2), pages 187-201, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:35:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13563-021-00253-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13563-021-00253-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13563-021-00253-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13563-021-00253-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Moel, 2002. "When Are Real Options Exercised? An Empirical Study of Mine Closings," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 35-64, March.
    2. Neingo, P.N. & Tholana, T. & Nhleko, A.S., 2018. "A comparison of three production rate estimation methods on South African platinum mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 118-124.
    3. Liu, Chang & Hu, Zhenhua & Li, Yan & Liu, Shaojun, 2017. "Forecasting copper prices by decision tree learning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 427-434.
    4. Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos G. & Abdel Sabour, Sabry A., 2007. "Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 116-125, September.
    5. Chatterjee, Snehamoy & Sethi, Manas Ranjan & Asad, Mohammad Waqar Ali, 2016. "Production phase and ultimate pit limit design under commodity price uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 658-667.
    6. Brennan, Michael J & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 1985. "Evaluating Natural Resource Investments," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(2), pages 135-157, April.
    7. Costa Lima, Gabriel A. & Suslick, Saul B., 2006. "Estimating the volatility of mining projects considering price and operating cost uncertainties," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 86-94, June.
    8. Dehghani, Hesam & Ataee-pour, Majid & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2014. "Evaluation of the mining projects under economic uncertainties using multidimensional binomial tree," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 124-133.
    9. Adrien Rimélé, M. & Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos & Gamache, Michel, 2018. "A stochastic optimization method with in-pit waste and tailings disposal for open pit life-of-mine production planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 112-121.
    10. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    11. Mehrdad Soleimani & Behshad Jodeiri Shokri, 2015. "Defining chromite ore production trend by CCD method to reach sustainable development goals in mining sector, Iran," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 28(3), pages 103-115, November.
    12. Dehghani, Hesam & Ataee-pour, Majid, 2012. "Determination of the effect of operating cost uncertainty on mining project evaluation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 109-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savolainen, Jyrki, 2016. "Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 49-65.
    2. Kuangyuan Zhang & Richard Olawoyin & Antonio Nieto & Andrew N. Kleit, 2018. "Risk of commodity price, production cost and time to build in resource economics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 2521-2544, December.
    3. Miranda, Oscar & Brandão, Luiz E. & Lazo Lazo, Juan, 2017. "A dynamic model for valuing flexible mining exploration projects under uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 393-404.
    4. Carlos Andrés Zapata Quimbayo, 2020. "OPCIONES REALES Una guía teórico-práctica para la valoración de inversiones bajo incertidumbre mediante modelos en tiempo discreto y simulación de Monte Carlo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 138, April.
    5. Evatt, Geoffrey William & Soltan, Mousa Omid & Johnson, Paul V., 2012. "Mineral reserves under price uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 340-345.
    6. Dehghani, Hesam & Ataee-pour, Majid & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2014. "Evaluation of the mining projects under economic uncertainties using multidimensional binomial tree," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 124-133.
    7. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    8. Kamel, Ahmed & Elwageeh, Mohamed & Bonduà, Stefano & Elkarmoty, Mohamed, 2023. "Evaluation of mining projects subjected to economic uncertainties using the Monte Carlo simulation and the binomial tree method: Case study in a phosphate mine in Egypt," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Dehghani, Hesam & Ataee-pour, Majid, 2012. "Determination of the effect of operating cost uncertainty on mining project evaluation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 109-117.
    10. Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos G. & Abdel Sabour, Sabry A., 2007. "Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 116-125, September.
    11. Díaz, Juan D. & Hansen, Erwin & Cabrera, Gabriel, 2020. "A random walk through the trees: Forecasting copper prices using decision learning methods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Guo, Hongquan & Nguyen, Hoang & Vu, Diep-Anh & Bui, Xuan-Nam, 2021. "Forecasting mining capital cost for open-pit mining projects based on artificial neural network approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Dehghani, Hesam & Bogdanovic, Dejan, 2018. "Copper price estimation using bat algorithm," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 55-61.
    14. Inthavongsa, Inthanongsone & Drebenstedt, Carsten & Bongaerts, Jan & Sontamino, Phongpat, 2016. "Real options decision framework: Strategic operating policies for open pit mine planning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 142-153.
    15. Azimi, Yousuf & Osanloo, Morteza & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2013. "An uncertainty based multi-criteria ranking system for open pit mining cut-off grade strategy selection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 212-223.
    16. Mohammad Rahman Ardhiansyah & Tsuyoshi Adachi & Junichiro Oda, 2023. "Stratified state aggregation (SSA) approach in real option valuation: combining price and grade uncertainties in tin mining projects," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 371-381, September.
    17. Helga Meier & Nicos Christofides & Gerry Salkin, 2001. "Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty---An Integrated Approach Using Contingent Claims Analysis and Integer Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 196-206, April.
    18. Miao, Jianjun & Wang, Neng, 2007. "Investment, consumption, and hedging under incomplete markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 608-642, December.
    19. Santos, Lúcia & Soares, Isabel & Mendes, Carla & Ferreira, Paula, 2014. "Real Options versus Traditional Methods to assess Renewable Energy Projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 588-594.
    20. Seiji Harikae & James S. Dyer & Tianyang Wang, 2021. "Valuing Real Options in the Volatile Real World," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 171-189, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:minecn:v:35:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13563-021-00253-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.