IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v18y2008i3p255-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bestimmungsfaktoren der Improvisation im Unternehmen

Author

Listed:
  • David Müller

Abstract

Despite all planning efforts improvisation is a necessary, planning supplementing form of decision making, which finds nearly none attention in the literature. In the paper nature and influence factors of improvisations in companies are examined based on literature investigations of musical and organizational improvisation. Improvisation is defined as a future-oriented problem solution behaviour in which realization of the problem solution starts without a complete anticipative reflection of alternatives and their consequences and results are integrated within the further solution process. The paper clarifies the difficulties of observation, description and use as well as limitations of improvisations. Planning is the primary, problem solution form which is necessary for the improvisation, thus this gets a content and time frame, a structure and a goal and thus the necessarily knowledge for the improvisation can be acquired. Actor-problem-relation, meta-plan and decision maker’s constant orientation are identified for the first time as influencing factors of improvisation in firms. Based on these results a holistic perspective of influencing factors is derived. The discussion is limited to single-actor decision making. Group decisions are suitable for a further discussion. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2008

Suggested Citation

  • David Müller, 2008. "Bestimmungsfaktoren der Improvisation im Unternehmen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 255-277, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:18:y:2008:i:3:p:255-277
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-007-0029-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-007-0029-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-007-0029-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dusya Vera & Mary Crossan, 2005. "Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 203-224, June.
    2. Mary Crossan & Joao Vieira da Cunha & Miguel Pina e Cunha & Dusya Vera, 2002. "Time and organizational improvisation," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp410, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    3. Sally Maitlis & Hakan Ozcelik, 2004. "Toxic Decision Processes: A Study of Emotion and Organizational Decision Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 375-393, August.
    4. Michael H. Zack, 2000. "Jazz Improvisation and Organizing: Once More from the Top," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 227-234, April.
    5. Chelariu, Cristian & Johnston, Wesley J. & Young, Louise, 2002. "Learning to improvise, improvising to learn: a process of responding to complex environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 141-147, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2010. "The “Third Hand”: IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 443-471, September.
    2. Li Xiong, 2022. "Improvise to win: the relationship between entrepreneurial improvisation and start-up competitive advantage," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 184-204, April.
    3. Verena Komander & Andreas König, 2024. "Organizations on stage: organizational research and the performing arts," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 303-352, February.
    4. Dusya Vera & Mary Crossan, 2005. "Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 203-224, June.
    5. Siyuan Yu & Yang Zhang & Jin Yu & Xuanzhi Yang & Abbas Mardani, 2021. "The Moderating Impact of Organizational Identity Strength between Strategic Improvisation and Organizational Memory and Their Effects on Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Maksim Belitski & Monika Herzig, 2018. "The Jam Session Model for Group Creativity and Innovative Technology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 506-521, April.
    7. Xiaozhi Huang & Xiaojie Zhang & Heng Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Mixed Emotions on Consumer Improvisation Behavior in the Environment of COVID-19: The Moderating Effect of Tightness-Looseness Culture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Hodgkinson, Ian R. & Hughes, Paul & Arshad, Darwina, 2016. "Strategy development: Driving improvisation in Malaysia," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 379-390.
    9. Abrantes, António Cunha Meneses & Passos, Ana Margarida & Cunha, Miguel Pina e & Santos, Catarina Marques, 2018. "Bringing team improvisation to team adaptation: The combined role of shared temporal cognitions and team learning behaviors fostering team performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 59-71.
    10. Liu, Yang & Lv, Diwei & Ying, Ying & Arndt, Felix & Wei, Jiang, 2018. "Improvisation for innovation: The contingent role of resource and structural factors in explaining innovation capability," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 32-41.
    11. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    12. Fischer, Denise & Greven, Andrea & Tornow, Mark & Brettel, Malte, 2021. "On the value of effectuation processes for R&D alliances and the moderating role of R&D alliance experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 606-619.
    13. Anthony K.P. Wensley & Juan Gabriel Cegarra‐Navarro & Gabriel Cepeda‐Carrión & Antonio Genaro Leal Millán, 2011. "How entrepreneurial actions transform customer capital through time," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(1), pages 132-150, March.
    14. Cristina B. Gibson & Rebekah Dibble, 2013. "Excess May Do Harm: Investigating the Effect of Team External Environment on External Activities in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 697-715, June.
    15. Conti, Claudio Ramos & Goldszmidt, Rafael & Vasconcelos, Flávio Carvalho de, 2020. "Firm characteristics and capabilities that enable superior performance in recessions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 553-561.
    16. Adomako, Samuel & Opoku, Robert A. & Frimpong, Kwabena, 2018. "Entrepreneurs' improvisational behavior and new venture performance: Firm-level and institutional contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 10-18.
    17. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Rigtering, J.P. Coen & Hughes, Mathew & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2020. "Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: Scale development and configurations for success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-12.
    18. Wu, Daoyou & Guo, Kun & He, Qiuyan & Zhang, Ju, 2023. "The impact of live streamers' improvisational responses to unexpected events on their entrepreneurial performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Joao Vieira da Cunha & Stewart R. Clegg & Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2008. "Structuring for glocalization: the minimal network," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp536, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    20. Ting Yu & Xueling Li, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The relationship between organizational improvisation and economic performance by moderating effects of regional economic level, market environment and cultural background: a meta-a," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 965-982, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:18:y:2008:i:3:p:255-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.