IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v85y2017i1d10.1007_s00186-016-0560-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FEMOEA: a fast and efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • J. L. Redondo

    (University of Almería, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence, ceiA3)

  • J. Fernández

    (University of Murcia)

  • P. M. Ortigosa

    (University of Almería, Agrifood Campus of International Excellence, ceiA3)

Abstract

A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm which can be applied to many nonlinear multi-objective optimization problems is proposed. Its aim is to quickly obtain a fixed size Pareto-front approximation. It adapts ideas from different multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, but also incorporates new devices. In particular, the search in the feasible region is carried out on promising areas (hyperspheres) determined by a radius value, which decreases as the optimization procedure evolves. This mechanism helps to maintain a balance between exploration and exploitation of the search space. Additionally, a new local search method which accelerates the convergence of the population towards the Pareto-front, has been incorporated. It is an extension of the local optimizer SASS and improves a given solution along a search direction (no gradient information is used). Finally, a termination criterion has also been proposed, which stops the algorithm if the distances between the Pareto-front approximations provided by the algorithm in three consecutive iterations are smaller than a given tolerance. To know how far two of those sets are from each other, a modification of the well-known Hausdorff distance is proposed. In order to analyze the algorithm performance, it has been compared to the reference algorithms NSGA-II and SPEA2 and the state-of-the-art algorithms MOEA/D and SMS-EMOA. Several quality indicators have been considered, namely, hypervolume, average distance, additive epsilon indicator, spread and spacing. According to the computational tests performed, the new algorithm, named FEMOEA, outperforms the other algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • J. L. Redondo & J. Fernández & P. M. Ortigosa, 2017. "FEMOEA: a fast and efficient multi-objective evolutionary algorithm," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(1), pages 113-135, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:85:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s00186-016-0560-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00186-016-0560-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00186-016-0560-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00186-016-0560-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ehrgott, Matthias & Klamroth, Kathrin & Schwehm, Christian, 2004. "An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 752-770, June.
    2. Francisco J. Solis & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1981. "Minimization by Random Search Techniques," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 19-30, February.
    3. Eligius M.T. Hendrix & Boglárka G.-Tóth, 2010. "Introduction to Nonlinear and Global Optimization," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-0-387-88670-1, September.
    4. JosÉ Figueira & Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrogott, 2005. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-23081-8, September.
    5. Beume, Nicola & Naujoks, Boris & Emmerich, Michael, 2007. "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1653-1669, September.
    6. Kulturel-Konak, Sadan & Smith, Alice E. & Norman, Bryan A., 2006. "Multi-objective tabu search using a multinomial probability mass function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(3), pages 918-931, March.
    7. Tan, K.C. & Goh, C.K. & Yang, Y.J. & Lee, T.H., 2006. "Evolving better population distribution and exploration in evolutionary multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 463-495, June.
    8. Schniederjans, Marc J. & Hollcroft, Ellen, 2005. "A multi-criteria modeling approach to jury selection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 81-102, March.
    9. Silverman, Joe & Steuer, Ralph E. & Whisman, Alan W., 1988. "A multi-period, multiple criteria optimization system for manpower planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 160-170, March.
    10. A Corberán & E Fernández & M Laguna & R Martí, 2002. "Heuristic solutions to the problem of routing school buses with multiple objectives," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(4), pages 427-435, April.
    11. Arrondo, Aránzazu Gila & Redondo, Juana L. & Fernández, José & Ortigosa, Pilar M., 2015. "Parallelization of a non-linear multi-objective optimization algorithm: Application to a location problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 114-124.
    12. Karl Doerner & Walter Gutjahr & Richard Hartl & Christine Strauss & Christian Stummer, 2004. "Pareto Ant Colony Optimization: A Metaheuristic Approach to Multiobjective Portfolio Selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 79-99, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Fernández & Boglárka Tóth, 2009. "Obtaining the efficient set of nonlinear biobjective optimization problems via interval branch-and-bound methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 393-419, April.
    2. Engau, Alexander, 2009. "Tradeoff-based decomposition and decision-making in multiobjective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 883-891, December.
    3. Constantin Zopounidis & Michael Doumpos, 2013. "Multicriteria decision systems for financial problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 241-261, July.
    4. Mir Seyed Mohammad Mohsen Emamat & Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota & Mohammad Reza Mehregan & Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Moghadam & Philippe Nemery, 2022. "Using ELECTRE-TRI and FlowSort methods in a stock portfolio selection context," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    5. Michael Brusco & Patrick Doreian & Douglas Steinley & Cinthia Satornino, 2013. "Multiobjective Blockmodeling for Social Network Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 498-525, July.
    6. Paolo Giudici & Gloria Polinesi & Alessandro Spelta, 2022. "Network models to improve robot advisory portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 965-989, June.
    7. Alexander Engau & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2008. "Interactive Coordination of Objective Decompositions in Multiobjective Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1350-1363, July.
    8. Panagiotis Xidonas & George Mavrotas & John Psarras, 2010. "Equity portfolio construction and selection using multiobjective mathematical programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 185-209, June.
    9. Fancello, Giovanna & Tsoukiàs, Alexis, 2021. "Learning urban capabilities from behaviours. A focus on visitors values for urban planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.
    11. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Oliveira, Carlos S. & Vieira, Victor, 2008. "Prioritization of bridges and tunnels in earthquake risk mitigation using multicriteria decision analysis: Application to Lisbon," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 442-450, June.
    12. Rastegar, Narges & Khorram, Esmaile, 2014. "A combined scalarizing method for multiobjective programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 229-237.
    13. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    14. Corrente, Salvatore & Figueira, José Rui & Greco, Salvatore, 2014. "The SMAA-PROMETHEE method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 514-522.
    15. Comino, E. & Ferretti, V., 2016. "Indicators-based spatial SWOT analysis: supporting the strategic planning and management of complex territorial systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64142, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Kaveh Madani & Laura Read & Laleh Shalikarian, 2014. "Voting Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Framework for Analyzing Group Decision Making Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1839-1856, May.
    17. Kadziński, MiŁosz & Greco, Salvatore & SŁowiński, Roman, 2012. "Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 488-501.
    18. C. P. Stephens & W. Baritompa, 1998. "Global Optimization Requires Global Information," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 575-588, March.
    19. Liagkouras, Konstantinos & Metaxiotis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Improving multi-objective algorithms performance by emulating behaviors from the human social analogue in candidate solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1019-1036.
    20. Haurant, P. & Oberti, P. & Muselli, M., 2011. "Multicriteria selection aiding related to photovoltaic plants on farming fields on Corsica island: A real case study using the ELECTRE outranking framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 676-688, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:85:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s00186-016-0560-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.