IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jsched/v19y2016i6d10.1007_s10951-015-0437-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing memory allocation for multistage scheduling including setup times

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Benoit

    (LIP, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS & INRIA)

  • Mathias Coqblin

    (FEMTO-ST Institute, UFC/CNRS/ENSMM/UTBM)

  • Jean-Marc Nicod

    (FEMTO-ST Institute, UFC/CNRS/ENSMM/UTBM)

  • Veronika Rehn-Sonigo

    (FEMTO-ST Institute, UFC/CNRS/ENSMM/UTBM)

Abstract

Mapping linear workflow applications onto a set of homogeneous processors can be optimally solved in polynomial time for the throughput objective with fewer processors than stages. This result holds true even when setup times occur in the execution and homogeneous buffers are available for the storage of intermediate results. In this kind of application, several computation stages are interconnected as a linear application graph, and each stage holds a buffer of limited size where intermediate results are stored and a processor setup time occurs when passing from one stage to another. In this paper, we tackle the problem in which the buffer sizes are not given beforehand and must be fixed before the execution to maximize the throughput within each processor. The goal of this work is to minimize the cost induced by the setup times by allocating buffers that are proportinal in size to each other. We present a closed formula to compute the optimal buffer allocation in the case of nondecreasing setup costs in the linear application. For the case of unsorted setup times, we provide competitive heuristics that are validated via extensive simulation. Three nonscalable brute force algorithms are also provided to compare heuristic approaches to optimal ones for small applications and to evaluate the relevance of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Benoit & Mathias Coqblin & Jean-Marc Nicod & Veronika Rehn-Sonigo, 2016. "Optimizing memory allocation for multistage scheduling including setup times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 641-658, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:19:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-015-0437-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10951-015-0437-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10951-015-0437-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10951-015-0437-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Luh & Ling Gou & Yuanhui Zhang & Takaaki Nagahora & Makoto Tsuji & Kiyoshi Yoneda & Tetsuo Hasegawa & Yuji Kyoya & Toshiyuki Kano, 1998. "Job shop scheduling with group-dependent setups, finite buffers, and long time horizon," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 76(0), pages 233-259, January.
    2. Allahverdi, Ali & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2008. "A survey of scheduling problems with setup times or costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 985-1032, June.
    3. Allahverdi, Ali & Soroush, H.M., 2008. "The significance of reducing setup times/setup costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 978-984, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V. Anjana & R. Sridharan & P. N. Ram Kumar, 2020. "Metaheuristics for solving a multi-objective flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 49-69, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Xu & Natarajan Gautam, 2020. "On competitive analysis for polling systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(6), pages 404-419, September.
    2. Sheikh, Shaya & Komaki, G.M. & Kayvanfar, Vahid & Teymourian, Ehsan, 2019. "Multi-Stage assembly flow shop with setup time and release time," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    3. Sioud, A. & Gagné, C., 2018. "Enhanced migrating birds optimization algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with sequence dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 66-73.
    4. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    5. Allahverdi, Ali, 2015. "The third comprehensive survey on scheduling problems with setup times/costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 345-378.
    6. Allahverdi, Ali & Aydilek, Harun, 2014. "Total completion time with makespan constraint in no-wait flowshops with setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 724-734.
    7. Sunantha Teyarachakul & Suresh Chand & Michal Tzur, 2016. "Lot sizing with learning and forgetting in setups: Analytical results and insights," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(2), pages 93-108, March.
    8. Ruiz, Rubén & Vázquez-Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2010. "The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Allahverdi, Ali, 2016. "A survey of scheduling problems with no-wait in process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 665-686.
    10. Gharbi, Anis & Ladhari, Talel & Msakni, Mohamed Kais & Serairi, Mehdi, 2013. "The two-machine flowshop scheduling problem with sequence-independent setup times: New lower bounding strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 69-78.
    11. Stefansdottir, Bryndis & Grunow, Martin & Akkerman, Renzo, 2017. "Classifying and modeling setups and cleanings in lot sizing and scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 849-865.
    12. Kangbok Lee & Lei Lei & Michael Pinedo, 2012. "Production scheduling with history‐dependent setup times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 58-68, February.
    13. Dominik Kress & David Müller & Jenny Nossack, 2019. "A worker constrained flexible job shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 179-217, March.
    14. Javad Rezaeian & Reza Alizadeh Foroutan & Toraj Mojibi & Yacob Khojasteh, 2023. "Sensitivity Analysis of the Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling Problem with Rework Processes and Machine Eligibility Restrictions," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1-24, September.
    15. Marko Ɖurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2019. "Creating dispatching rules by simple ensemble combination," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 959-1013, December.
    16. Dongni Li & Xianwen Meng & Miao Li & Yunna Tian, 2016. "An ACO-based intercell scheduling approach for job shop cells with multiple single processing machines and one batch processing machine," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 283-296, April.
    17. Bozorgirad, Mir Abbas & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2013. "Bi-criteria group scheduling in hybrid flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 599-612.
    18. Omid Shahvari & Rasaratnam Logendran & Madjid Tavana, 2022. "An efficient model-based branch-and-price algorithm for unrelated-parallel machine batching and scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 589-621, October.
    19. A. Dolgui & M. Kovalyov & K. Shchamialiova, 2011. "Multi-product lot-sizing and sequencing on a single imperfect machine," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 465-482, December.
    20. Shahvari, Omid & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2016. "Hybrid flow shop batching and scheduling with a bi-criteria objective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 239-258.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jsched:v:19:y:2016:i:6:d:10.1007_s10951-015-0437-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.